Skip to content
    • — about/contact —
    • — hello —
    • latest
    • screaming into the void
    • baking shows
    • little stories

MiTHology (4.0)

  • TOP 10: Cartoon Characters I Have Loved

    September 8th, 2026
    Daily writing prompt
    Who is your favorite cartoon character?
    View all responses

    … I bet you can’t guess who my all-time favorite cartoon character is. It’s not like I make it painfully obvious on my WordPress profile or anything.

    So, the real ones, those who know their early-90s animated films, already know who #1 on this list is going to be.

    But there are at least nine others also worth mentioning:

    .

    Cartoon characters and I, we have a long history. Going all the way back to early childhood, I’ve had these phases of intense obsession with certain cartoon characters.

    I think this fictophilia is connected to the AVPD in some way: fictional figures are easier, less dangerous, to love; in the safety of your imagination, they can’t hurt you, and you can’t fumble it with them. Imaginary worlds are the only places where it’s safe to experience strong emotions. I’m sure many of us socially anxious nerds out there can relate.

    But the catch is, made-up characters can still hurt you — when they’re not your own.

    Because you have no control over someone else’s intellectual property. You might daydream about it, you might wish you did, but you don’t. Thus, when you love a fictional character, there’s still a risk. You don’t get to decide what happens to them in their story. You have to wait, with bated breath, for the creator to release new content. You’re reliant on an outside source for canon information. (Unless you’re into fanfiction, I guess, which I, being a fierce individualist, have never been; with exactly two notable exceptions, I’ve always looked all the way down my nose at fanfic; be original, if you’re going to create something; don’t steal someone else’s characters, ffs!) You can’t just access their world at any time — you can’t have any actual agency in the character’s “life.” And besides, all the other fans have just as much right to them as you do. You have to share them. You never get to own them.

    I didn’t like that. It made things too stressful, for me, too roller-coastery, too unpredictable. Made me feel helpless and weak and needy and pathetic. I hate being dependent. Also hate sharing what is deeply important to me — no, you can’t love this character too, they are mine! I hate being a trend-follower.

    So, I came up with the best solution: OCs.

    My own fictional people to obsess over. And now I make the rules, and am not a slave to any creator but myself.

    And it worked! Beautifully! Since the inception of my fictional world in early 2003, I haven’t had any more intense obsessions with other people’s characters. Only mine. I am free. I am alone — the sole member of this little fandom, with no one to geek out about characters or new content with — but, I am free. And I get to decide what is canon now!

    There are still characters that I’ve greatly enjoyed, though. Not all of the characters on this list are ones with which I had one of my signature pre-2003 intense obsessions. Some of these, I just think are super cool. Even though I’m no longer subject to such obsessions, I still have a lot of love for animation/illustration and fictional people in general. Anyway — I’ll explain more as we go along. Without further ado:

    10. Buzz Lightyear. I’m no Pixar fan, not anymore, and it honestly pisses me off that they are still making Toy Story sequels — shamelessly milking every last penny out of that dried-up franchise that they possibly can, instead of coming up with original ideas — disgusting. But, Buzz couldn’t not make this list, because he was my first love — my first real crush. My first cartoon obsession. I was in first grade, and the original Toy Story had just come out, and I was as in love with Buzz Lightyear as a seven-year-old could be. I had all the merch, the action figures, the sweatsuit — it was my Whole Thing. Even then, it had an unhealthy element of intense shame. I was afraid for people to know how deep were my feelings about Buzz, but also longed to talk about nothing but him every minute of the day, which was a very isolating sort of feeling. It felt like a proto-addiction. I don’t know why I was already like this at seven years old.

    9. Clopin (the puppet guy from Hunchback of Notre Dame). He became my next obsession after Buzz. For years, I thought something was very wrong with me, psychologically, for finding Clopin so strangely attractive — but in recent years, I’ve learned that I’m far from alone! There are lots of girls out there who salivate over him! He has quite a fandom! What is it about him? In real life, I’m not into skinny twiggy guys. But Clopin has a certain weird charisma for sure. Second-grade Mith was not the only one who noticed, after all.

    8. Rei Kashino from the manga series MARS. This was 2004, so the post-OC era; thus I never developed an intense obsession, but this series came pretty close, and got under my skin way more than media usually does (and, tbh, had quite an influence on my fictional world, which I’m ashamed to admit can still be noticed in my writing to this day). I’ve said it before and will say it again: this is the best manga of all time, and Rei and Kira are two of the most beautiful characters ever drawn in the genre; they’re everything that the stars of a high school romance should be. Plus, it has that ’90s aesthetic that I’m such a simp for.

    7. Trent from Daria. Again: not a serious obsession, but I always loved this show, and Trent was my favorite male character. How I longed, back in those days, for a lazy stoner band guy of my very own. I was as infatuated with him as Daria herself was. (Interestingly, she and I both actually ended up with well-adjusted, wholesome, intelligent, literature-loving Good Guys.) My favorite female character on this show?: undoubtedly Sandi. “GEE, QUINN 🤨” is something I still repeat semi-regularly to myself, when the situation merits it, because her accent was just so hilarious.

    6. Johnny, the Homicidal Maniac. This is such a gross, terrible comic book series, and I no longer have any love for it at all, but when I was in seventh grade I thought it was just sooo extremely ~Edgy~ and ~Dark~ and ~Punk Rock~. 🙄 Nny was, in fact, my last major cartoon character obsession; it was the unbearable emotional turmoil of that particular phase that made me realize I couldn’t do this anymore, I had to get some OCs of my own. The secrecy, the irresistibility, the maddening weight of it. I won’t even go into detail about the great lengths that I went to to obtain a copy of the Director’s Cut — my parents, obviously, didn’t want me to have it — and to keep it a secret. It’s truly embarrassing to admit, now, but there was a time when I thought Johnny C. was dreamy as heck and fantasized daily about being the only person in his life that he wouldn’t want to kill.

    5. Miguel and

    4. Tulio, from The Road to El Dorado. Obviously, I mean, come on. These guys were my 4th-5th grade obsession. DreamWorks knew exactly what they were doing here; this movie had no business being so sexy.

    3. Izaya from DRRR!. I discovered this one in 2018, so well beyond the era of my youthful obsessions… but, this came pretty close to mirroring that, and if I’d found the show/manga prior to 2003, I just know it would have become a Whole Thing. Izaya specifically is the magic ingredient that makes the series so much fun; he is the best anime villain of all time, and he and Shizuo are my favorite anime couple (I know the creator has said that they’re not in love, and I know I said above that fans don’t get to decide what’s canon, buuuut, yeah, in this case, sorry, Shizaya is canon.)

    2. Invader ZIM. My second-to-last major cartoon obsession. And before you accuse me of being some kind of trend-following HotTopic scene kid, know that I was there when it began. I watched the ZIM pilot not the Friday night it aired, but two nights later when they re-aired it on Sunday night (April 1, 2001). Immediately it became a Whole Thing. I was 11, and positively indignant that no one (in the show or irl) took Zim seriously, no one else understood him, but I saw him for what he really was, I respected him, he and I were made for each other, we would take over this miserable planet together! I was extremely secretive about this obsession, to the point where I’d literally build a privacy tent by draping a big blanket over my head + the family PC (or my head and the TV, while standing like 1 foot away from the screen) to watch ZIM or look at pictures of him on AOL. So that the family wouldn’t see what I was doing. It was all I cared about, and I lived in constant, sickening fear of being found out. Again, I don’t know why I was already like this at such a young age.

    And finally, my favorite cartoon character of all time:

    1. Batty, of course. Batty was never a Major Obsession of mine, never a crush or anything (even I’m not that weird, haha!) but actually, that makes my associations with him even more positive, because, as mentioned, these obsessions were always riddled with so much fear and angst and shame. No, Batty has been a constant; he’s always just made me happy when I see him, happy when I think about him, and as a vegetarian/vegan/supporter of animal rights and a generally tense, anxious, mistrustful, creepy, and weird person in general, I’ve always strongly identified with him as a character. I’m never getting any more tattoos, but if I had to get one, it’d be of Batty for sure. Plus, as you guys know, I’ve loved rap music from an early age, and Batty Rap was one of the first rap songs I loved — it is to this day probably the hardest song in any kids’ movie ever. I mean come on:

    … So yes, there’s that; now you all know how weird I really am. Whatever. I’m in the back half of my 30s now and happily married to a real life flesh-and-blood human person, and wouldn’t have it any other way, so, go ahead and call me whatever you want. If I cared anymore, I wouldn’t be posting this on my blog. If somehow you are still reading this and can actually relate to any of it — hi! we should be friends.

  • The Worst Book I’ve Ever Read

    September 5th, 2026
    Daily writing prompt
    Have you ever regretted reading a book — which one and why?
    View all responses

    Why yes, WordPress Daily Prompts! There is a book that I regret reading! I read it six years ago, and still think almost daily about how much I regret reading it. An absolutely despicable trash heap of an excuse for literature. Seriously — may as well bind up a bunch of used bathroom tissue between two covers and call it a book. Buckle up folks!

    (– oh, wow. Now I actually feel kind of bad writing this. I just Googled the author to see if he was still alive, because if so I wanted to begin my post with a quick little aside directed at him personally, to say that I mean him no offense; my revulsion and horror at his book is a clear sign that he accomplished his goal to a T, and he’s actually a very gifted writer; he set out to write something despicable, gross, and nightmare-inducing, and did so perfectly, more memorably than anyone else I’ve ever read. I was going to write him this little note, here, and then saw, upon Googling, that he apparently died earlier this year. I had no idea. May his soul rest in peace.)

    The author in question is one Dan Simmons (1948-2026), and the horrible book of his that I regret reading is Song of Kali.

    Have any of you ever read this? If so, then you know what I’m talking about. If not, then don’t read it — especially if you’re a parent.

    Why did I even read this book? I don’t usually go for dark horror. (I do enjoy some fun paranormal horror sometimes, like a bit of Stephen King, but not the heavy/grisly stuff.) The reason is, my husband and I were looking for a book to read together, as we often like to do, and a coworker of his, knowing that my husband likes horror, recommended this Dan Simmons book. We didn’t know what to expect, but decided to give it a shot.

    I am going to spoil this book for you (TW), because I don’t believe it merits not spoiling, so, stop reading here if for some reason you actually plan on reading this piece of garbage.

    The baby dies. An eight-month-old baby girl dies brutally. Why, I still wonder, did my husband’s coworker recommend this book to him, knowing that he had an eight-month-old daughter at home at the time? FFS.

    Sometimes a tragedy in a book is good, is meaningful. Sometimes it’s earned. This one… was not. Everything leading up to the death was horrible and miserable, and the death just felt like: “oh wow, okay, we’re really gonna stoop this low now.” It wasn’t even the thrilling, exciting kind of horror. It was just dreary and miserable from start to finish; not a single moment that made you feel like any of it was worthwhile. Horror should at least be fun, imo.

    “Well, that doesn’t mean dark horror is bad, Mith, it just means you don’t like it.” Wrong! If Song of Kali is a good example of “good” dark horror, then the entire genre is objectively shit and anyone who believes otherwise needs to see a psychiatrist.

    If you’re going to make your audience straight up miserable from beginning to end, you’d better have a very good reason for it (exhibit A: the movie Calvary). “Look at how horrible I can make you feel” is not a good reason.

    The other thing that pissed me off about Song of Kali was, it left a really bad taste in my mouth for anything relating to the beautiful nation of India. I’ve always appreciated India (some of the best vegetarian cuisine in the world!), which was one reason why this book appealed to me at first. The novel focuses on an American family’s trip to India, and is very much about India, and dwells a lot on the sensory details of its scenery, cityscapes, customs, and culture — always casting it in an extremely unappetizing light. Making the whole country look like one big nightmarish circus sideshow. I think if I were of Indian descent, I’d be downright offended! It’s a truly unflattering portrait of a perfectly decent country. From the time I read this book, for a long time, any mention of anything Indian gave me the major ick. (Until I discovered this absolute gem of a song, that is; thank you to this artist for singlehandedly healing my India trauma.)

    Well, that’s enough. I’ve already wasted too much time on this book. In conclusion: Song of Kali is trash. No offense to Mr. Simmons, who clearly was a sick genius of some kind. I wish him all the best, but, dear reader, if you value your time and/or your inner peace, do not read this book. I’m still mad about the hours of my life that I wasted allowing myself to be tortured by this book for no reason.

  • TOP 10: Reasons I’m Not Converting to Islam (plus, the long story of how I almost began to kind of halfway think about considering converting)

    September 3rd, 2026

    Confession time! I’m about to get real honest here.

    You may have noticed — or, probably not, who am I kidding — that MiTHology (4.0) has been down, or available only in a very abbreviated version, for a little while now. But it’s back! Why? What happened?

    Well, a number of things. There’s been a lot of things happening in my irl life. One of which has been that I’ve been hitting a point of utter exhaustion — burnout, even — with regards to the whole identity crisis that has basically been the subject of this blog since its inception.

    In recent times, I’ve found that it feels more tiring, more depressing than anything, trying to be a Traditional Catholic. Don’t get me wrong!, I’m fully aware that being Christian is not meant to be a cake walk; look to the examples of the martyrs and see that suffering is love, we must expect unhappiness in this world, and etc. etc. And I’ve never been big on feelings, anyway. Religion is an intellectual thing, for me, and always has been, so whether a religion is fun/pleasant or not isn’t really a deciding factor, for me, when it comes to whether it’s true.

    However, I also don’t think the experience of being Catholic is supposed to look like “constant feelings of crippling social anxiety, self-doubt, and heart-pounding stress about not measuring up to some strict lifestyle standard.” I’m not even talking about religious scrupulosity. It’s more like a pathological case of “keeping up with the Joneses.” It’s not a noble struggle against sin and the world, or anything like that. It’s just a fucking drag.

    For a long time, I was really feeling like: “the Traditional Church is no place for me, I simply cannot belong here, the social pressure is too much” – but at the same time, going back to the modern Church was no longer an option, now that I could see what a sad joke it is (I mean, “excommunicating” the SSPX, but meanwhile doing fuck-all about the “Proud Catholic” American politician who signed into effect a bill allowing abortion up until birth, for any reason? Give me a break!). I never stopped believing in Catholicism, but the whole system started to feel broken and uninhabitable, for me.

    So, around this time, the time that I finally hit a burnout point with my Catholic life (and also at a low point, hormonally), I happened to stumble upon the topic of Islam.

    As you may have seen in my other recent Top 10 post, a lot of things about it really appealed to me. A lot of things.

    I said in that post that there was no part of me that was even remotely considering the possibility of converting. That was, actually, not entirely true.

    Islam has a lot of things going for it. To someone who’s burnt out, and feels like living as a Catholic has become borderline impossible… it’s incredibly seductive.

    I fear sounding “ecumenical” by praising the virtues of Islam here, but, you know what, I’m just going to be honest.

    The really alluring thing, for me, was the simplicity. For someone whose faith is purely an intellectual endeavor, this is huge — Occam’s razor and all.

    In Islam, it’s like this: there is one God, the Creator. Muhammad is his prophet, so do what the Quran says. End of story.

    In Catholicism, it’s like: there is one God, the Creator. But also, God is a Trinity, Who begot the Son and they brought forth the Holy Ghost and don’t even bother trying to understand this because trying to express it in a way that makes sense is actually literally heresy. Also, Mary is conceived without original sin (which btw is a thing, which means that everyone, even newborns, are automatically guilty of something they never did and are born deserving of eternal hellfire; take a look at your newborn child and tell me this isn’t a counterintuitive teaching!) and is the Mother of God, i.e. of Jesus, Who is both God and man and was resurrected from the dead (!) and then ascended into Heaven in a cloud and also assumed His Mother up to Him soon thereafter, which is dogma although not in the Bible. Which btw is a collection of hard-to-interpret stories by many different authors from across the centuries and sometimes should be interpreted literally, other times poetically, so it’s authoritative but also you need an authority figure to interpret it for you. And if you don’t believe any of that you cannot call yourself Catholic.

    What I’m saying is, Catholicism is complex and beautiful and has a lot going on, philosophically. It requires a lot more intellectual assent than Islam. A lot more prep work and formation. For me, who wasn’t raised Christian so struggled to get on board with Jesus and Mary, but never really struggled to believe in God, the basics of Islam line up much more effortlessly with what I know, at my core, without any kind of “intellectual assent” or “acceptance,” to be true.

    What I mean is, I know that God exists like I know that 2+2=4. All the other Catholic doctrines, I accept because I’m told it’s so and I believe the Church is trustworthy, that its teachings are beautifully, perfectly logical. But, it’s hard to believe, on a gut level. It’s hard to believe that the Resurrection, the Ascension, or the Assumption really happened, or that babies are born guilty, or that a human woman could be the Mother of God. Those things are mind-boggling and require a lot of humility to accept. But I do choose to accept them, as an act of faith, because it seems to add up and I want to believe it.

    But that feels a lot different from knowing, the way I know there is one God, the Creator.

    There are lots of other things about Islam that I liked, too. The clarity. In Catholicism, there’s a lot of gray area, with regards to whether certain things are permissible at certain times and for certain people. For example: the issues of music, family planning, enjoying art, and exactly how much to give when it comes to charitable giving. In Islam, there are very clear answers to all of these questions! There’s no “better ask your parish priest.” It’s just a yes or a no.

    And even in issues where there’s more wiggle room/gray area, like family planning, the answers are much more clear: a simple “it’s permissible but not good, and never required” – such a concise reply to a question that had been plaguing me for years, and no Christian ever seemed to have such a short and sweet answer to!

    And how much should I give charitably?? Another question that’s stressed me out since my conversion twelve years ago! Christians play it by ear, it’s a very case-by-case type of situation, but Muslims literally HAVE A CALCULATOR where you punch in your income, assets, bills, and debts, and it spits out the exact number you need to give. I freaking love that idea!

    It just seemed to make so much sense! Everything felt so clean and bright! Certain things about it just clicked with me, such as alcohol, music, and dog drool all being haram/unclean. So clear, so simple, so right.

    Not only that, but everything about Islam looked, to me, much more consistently aligned with the Old Testament. The apparent disparity between the religion/spirituality of the Old Testament and that of modern Christianity has always been a bit hard for me to understand (and yes, I know there is a Catholic explanation, which I do understand and agree with; but the Islamic answer is much easier to understand, and requires much less in the way of mental acuity and flexibility and reading comprehension).

    The simple, uncomplicated core tenet of Islam – “there is one God, the Creator” – felt so right, so familiar to me. It felt like what I had naturally believed all along, like something already built into me. – And guess what! It’s not just me. Muslims actually have a word for this feeling (“Fitrah”)! They believe that everyone is essentially born Muslim at their heart, inclined to believe in and serve the one true God. That’s why all converts to Islam are called “reverts,” even if they were never technically Muslim before. When I learned that, about Fitrah and reversion, it honestly give me chills.

    And plus! To me, it seemed rather telling that Muslims view Christians with respect, thinking they’re on the right track but sadly misguided, while Christians talk about Muslims as if they are absolutely the devil incarnate. The same reason (among the many reasons, that is) that I went with Catholicism over Orthodoxy. We Catholics think of the Orthodox as our sadly-separated brothers in Christ, while the Orthodox (or, at least the online Orthobros) view us as EVIL !! and HERETICS !! and GOING TO HELL. Typically, my instinct tells me that the more generous, level-headed, polemic-free side of any argument is probably onto something. Because the truth doesn’t need a bunch of heated polemicists raging to defend it, right?

    So yes. I was a bit seduced. I began to wonder if if was true.

    But at the same time… I didn’t trust. I didn’t trust my own feelings or thought process here. And the fact that I felt so strongly, made me trust myself even less. How could I be feeling so strongly about another religion when like five minutes ago I was claiming to be all about Catholicism? What is happening? Am I that big of a flake? Am I really just one of those loony, unstable religious maniacs who’s always converting? “Oh look, this week she’s a Hijabi, what’ll it be next week? And she expects everyone to take her seriously!” What will I be in ten years, then – a Hindu?! And am I going to drag my children along on this roller coaster with me?! That’s not fair to them, to have an unstable mom who keeps changing up the truth on them, whipping the rug out from under their tender feet!

    (Luckily, I wasn’t gullible enough to actually introduce my children to Islam. No, this only went on for a few weeks, and remained a private experiment, because I knew I needed time to figure it out before speaking about it to anyone; there was never a question of making it a family affair anytime soon. At least I’m not that much of a maniac, I guess.)

    But is there really no substance to me whatsoever? Am I really just completely empty inside after all? (Truly, this is the first time in my 36 years that I can say I know what it’s like to feel “empty inside.”)

    Islam and Catholicism: clearly, one of these religions is right and the other is wrong. The fact that I felt drawn to both, inevitably implies that somewhere along the way, I’d fallen for Satan’s wiles. It was all just massively discouraging.

    Luckily, this whole time, I had a quiet intuition that I would never actually convert away from Catholicism. I think I somehow knew I couldn’t. This fascination with Islam, it was like developing a crush on someone new while you’re in a committed relationship. They say that when you first fall in love with someone, all their little quirks are so charming and endearing, and you’ll happily make excuses for anything they do – but after you’ve been together a while, those same quirks start to annoy you. (Husband, if you’re reading this, I’m not talking about you; it’s just an oft-repeated trope about long-term relationships; you do not annoy me.) If hypothetically I had chosen to think about converting… at this point, I had to admit, with a deep sigh, I could already foresee myself wanting to convert again in a matter of months or years. (And in Islam you’re liable to be killed if you do that, lol. No joke, that’s in the Quran.)

    And besides my own utter emptiness and flakiness, which led me to believe that I can’t really be trusted to choose my own religion at all, there were several other things that turned me off from the whole Islam thing, and made me content to stay where I am.

    And these aren’t your typical “Why I’m Not a Muslim” arguments. Believe me, I listened to and read a lot of those! And some of the most popular ones, I honestly didn’t find very compelling. I was even prepared to defend it in some of these regards:

    I wasn’t swayed by accusations of it being “the religion of violence.” Because the Old Testament is seriously comprised of like 40% stories about the Israelites slaughtering entire cities, including women and children, to win the land for God. And that was seen as a good thing, a victory. If we believe in that, then why are we appalled by the idea that God is violent sometimes, even today? I don’t like the idea any more than you do, but, what if? As Flannery O’Connor famously quoted, the Bible itself says “the Kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and the violent bear it away.” I think our modern society is so pacifistic, so estranged from death, that we have lost touch with that primitive, bloody religiosity that we see in the O.T. and in Islam. And we Christians say that our religion was spread peacefully, “by the blood of martyrs,” but it’s not like the Crusades and the European conquest of the Americas didn’t happen. And besides all that, the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful folks who mind their own business, anyway.

    Nor was I swayed by the accusations that the Quran is highly imperfect, that it was originally written with bad spelling and grammar, or that it’s not perfectly preserved as some claim. For one, Muhammad was illiterate, so it makes sense that if he (or his scribes) were writing down what God had spoken to him, there’d probably be grammatical/spelling errors. And even if there are slightly different versions of the Quran floating around in the world, I think it’s probably still more consistent, content-wise, than the Bible, which, we followers of Christ can’t even agree on how many books it has.

    Nor was I swayed by the “just because it’s beautiful doesn’t mean it’s from God” argument. I wasn’t sold on the argument from beauty yet, but didn’t think I could dismiss it entirely without having some familiarity with Arabic. Apparently, the beauty and poetry of the language of the Quran in the original Arabic is unrivaled, so sublime as to be impossible for a human to mimic. “Well so what,” some Christians say. “Shakespeare wrote beautiful poetry, does that mean he was God?” I don’t think we should be so quick to throw this argument out without knowing the language. There are degrees of beauty, some things are more beautiful than others, and you can’t really compare when they’re not even written in the same alphabet. Shakespeare may be good, but no one was ever inspired to say of his works that “there’s no way a human wrote this.” There must be something to the Quran, then, maybe, I thought.

    Nor even by the arguments from science, which normally go like this: a Muslim says “the Quran expresses scientific truths that someone in 600AD Arabia couldn’t possibly have known, things that humans wouldn’t discover to be scientifically true until centuries later!” To which a Christian replies, sarcastically: “you mean like that the moon was literally split in two, or that the sun descends into a pond when it sets, or that semen is produced between a man’s backbone and ribs?”

    To which Mith replies: eh, so what? Science is cool but it doesn’t really sway me either way, when it comes to this stuff, because it seems that “trusting the science” is just as much a matter of faith as any religion. We humans love to think we’ve got it all figured out because We Did the Science. But trusting our own perceptions, or, to remove it even a step further, the perceptions of the authorities in academia just because they’re in academia, is a bold move. This is why I don’t have an opinion on things like evolution, the reality of dinosaurs, the literal or non-literal nature of the Genesis creation story, whether the moon was split, or where semen actually comes from. I think there’s more to the natural world than meets the eye, and the best we humans can do is infer… but I don’t necessarily trust it, anymore than I trust my own wishy-washy religious sentiments.

    So no, the science argument didn’t sway me, nor did several other Christian counterarguments. But! There were some things I learned that did sway me back toward Catholicism. And here they are:

    10. Islam’s prohibition on music, art, and dance. This was the first thing I learned about Islam that made me go: hmm, wait a minute, that doesn’t seem right.

    However, as you know, I don’t trust my own feelings, so I didn’t let that sway me; after all, if I just follow whatever “feels right” to me, then my only religion is myself, right? I’m aware that the idea is to follow God not because He makes sense to us, but because He is God. So if He says “don’t make art or music,” then that’s that… right?

    And plus, to further support the notion of an art ban: in the King James Version of the Christian Bible, the Fourth Commandment actually is translated as saying “thou shalt not make any likeness of any living thing.” – Not saying that I put too much stock in a Protestant interpretation. The Catholic interpretation here is that we are not to make any idols out of objects that we make ourselves. Which makes more sense, considering that right there in the same book, God commands Moses and the Israelites to construct the serpent on Moses’s staff and the angels on the Ark of the Covenant. So I think we Catholics got it right, with this one.

    Drawing, dancing, and singing are such a natural part of being human. Kids start doing them when they’re still babies. It’s how they learn. If for adults these are sinful to do… at what age do they become sinful? How can something that’s good for little kids to do (because Islam even admits that kids should sing, draw, and play with dolls) become a sin after a certain age? It doesn’t add up, to me.

    It’d be like if we were told it was sinful to have friends or to play or to laugh; just essential parts of being human.

    Now, I get that something being natural doesn’t make that thing good. Plenty of things that humans do by nature are bad. But, those things are things that we teach our kids not to do. They aren’t things that are educational in the formative years and then become bad. That just doesn’t make sense. Bad is always bad.

    I think the reason for the ban against drawing likenesses of living things, is because humans shouldn’t presume to try to be like God.

    Which brings me to another interesting difference between Catholicism and Islam. As Christians, our goal is what the Orthodox call “theosis:” becoming God. Reducing the self until we are one with God, so that His will is our will, and we can be wholly united to Him in Heaven. Art – beautiful art, that is – aids in this process because, in creating, we are co-creators with God. Imitating Him and His goodness. Creativity is, after all, a gift that He has given us, made in His image as we are. And beautiful art can teach people about the goodness of God.

    In Islam there is no such thing as theosis. Humans cannot be like God and shouldn’t even presume to try. Only God can create life, and to try to imitate Him is haram.

    Personally, I think the Christian approach feels more right and more edifying. “It’s just that you’re an indoctrinated Westerner,” a Muslim might tell me, “and an art school alumna at that!” – but, creativity is universal, isn’t it? Is it really likely that something we encourage in our children, for their education, is actually satanic? I’m not buying it.

    9. Ideas about marriage. The Quran explicitly tells husbands to “beat” their wives as discipline when they act up. And this is the literal word of God?! I’m no feminist, and am all for traditional gender roles in marriage, but I firmly believe that wife-beating is never Godly behavior. A Godly man can lead his wife without hurting her. “Love your wives as Christ loves His Church” is, imo, a much holier instruction for marriage.

    And, the Quran tells men to take multiple wives – up to four, I think. And Muhammad himself had more than that.

    Now, I’m aware that we see this a lot in the Old Testament, and if consistency with the Old Testament matters so much, then why should polygamy bother me?

    Well, in the New Testament Christ specifically tells us that God allowed the Israelites to practice divorce because they were weak and God is merciful – but that does not mean that divorce is good. Makes sense that the same probably applies to polygamy. God made Eve for Adam; one man + one woman just makes sense; the nuclear family is written into the laws of nature, and it’s silly to argue that it’s not. It’s pretty evident to me that Christ clarified, sanctified, and perfected natural law marriage. Along with a lot of other things about the Old Testament.

    8. Still continuing with the topic of marriage: one of Muhammad’s wives was literally six years old when he married her! And he was in his fifties at the time! Oh but don’t worry!, he didn’t consummate the marriage until she was nine… nine…!, and this man is supposed to be the ultimate model of virtue, the paragon of goodness, the example of exactly how we should behave, as humans. Hard pass. I’m aware that societal norms were different in 600AD Arabia, but I just don’t think there was ever a time or place in which it was morally okay for a 50 year old man to sleep with a 9 year old.

    7. Allah literally calls himself “The Great Deceiver,” at one point in the Quran. Yikes! That freaked me out a bit. It directly contradicts what we Catholics say in the Act of Faith: “… I believe these and all the truths which the Holy Catholic Church teaches, because Thou hast revealed them, Who canst neither deceive nor be deceived.” The latter sounds more like the God that my heart believes in. The former sounds… kinda like the opposite.

    6. Which brings me to this one historical tidbit. Apparently, when Muhammad first received his divine vision, he was horrified, and thought it was satan, and immediately wanted to commit suicide because of it. Does that sound like something that came from God? How could anything from God make a person want to kill themselves? That doesn’t sound right to me; I couldn’t quite get past this one.

    5. The Islamic idea of heaven, or Jannah, doesn’t sound as heavenly to me as the Christian Heaven.

    This goes back to the theosis thing I discussed in item #10. In Catholicism (and Orthodoxy), for us to enter Heaven, we must become like God. Because Heaven is basically being one with God, engaged in eternal worship of God: the eternal glory of perfect love, of participation in the love of the Blessed Trinity, of singing the praises of God forever. That’s why, per a Catholic understanding, most people don’t actually want to go to Heaven, even though they might think they do. Most people just want satisfaction of their self-centered desires – a condition which is better suited to life in hell. Most people, if they could glimpse Heaven, would probably actually choose hell because it’s easier, and you’re more able to focus on yourself and your own desires. It’s more familiar, basically. This is why so few people go to Heaven – because so few people actually want to! If we truly want to, of course Christ will welcome us in. But to be a member of God we must actually let ourselves be made members of God via theosis.

    So that’s the Christian take on Heaven. It’s challenging, it’s edifying, it’s beautiful, and it makes sense.

    Muslims don’t do theosis. For them, Jannah is like an eternal dessert: a prize for being good on earth, a paradise of eternal pleasure. If I understand it correctly, it’s a place where Allah will let them enjoy whatever they want: beautiful spouses, delicious food, comfortable houses, just sheer pleasure and delight for all eternity.

    It sounds appealing, sure!, but, imo this take on Heaven also kind of… demeans the human person? “Material pleasure is the best thing you can hope to achieve” – but, we’re not animals. And frankly, wouldn’t all that pleasure get kind of boring after a few millennia? This idea of heaven doesn’t really require you to become perfect. Just following the letter of the law doesn’t make you good, as Christ very well taught us. So I have a hard time believing that this is God’s design for humanity. God as I understand Him wants real happiness for us, i.e. the destruction of selfish appetites and living entirely in union with Him.

    4. This one is more of a subjective reason than an argument, but, religion, after all, should be both subjective and objective, for us, so it makes sense that some of my reasons are subjective. Such a legalistic, black-and-white system can easily lead to despair, in my experience.

    Case in point: as I became interested in Islam, for a brief period I started trying to copy their prayer style, to like try it on for size, if you will, while still praying as a Catholic; thinking maybe I could borrow some of the elements of their faith that I liked, and apply them to a Catholic lifestyle. So I had alarms in my phone. When the alarm goes off, you have a set amount of time to drop whatever you’re currently doing and do your prayers. If you don’t do them in that set amount of time, or if you don’t wash properly beforehand, or if you don’t have your feet and hands in the correct positions, or if something distracts you and you have to pause and talk to someone, your prayers are worthless. Or if there’s a picture hanging on your wall, your prayers in that room are worthless. Whew! I realize that the idea is that God just wants you to do your best and that’s what counts… but also, this mindset of “it must be a certain way at a certain time or it doesn’t count”… in my experience, which was just a few days, it made me just want to give up. I couldn’t do it on time, I couldn’t not be interrupted, so why bother. I didn’t know what to say anymore. My prayer life suffered.

    3. Besides, upon further research, I found that Islamic moral philosophy is not always so black and white after all. Just like in Catholicism, you have your progressives and you have your Rad Trads. Opinions vary widely, from “the hijab is not required” to “women should cover even their fingernails, and must never speak in public because even their voice is ‘awrah.’” Likewise, some say “all music is haram because it intoxicates the mind, just listen to the Quran instead”; others contest this by saying “it’s really only music made on certain kinds of instruments that’s haram, so, it’s totally licit if you’re making music on a computer.” Or, “only certain lyrics and genres are haram, but classical is fine.” Same exact deal as us over here in the West! So, if you’re looking for a refuge of total clarity, I can report that this actually isn’t the way to go.

    2. Going back to number four and the despair thing: in trying to think about things in Islamic-ish terms, I quickly became overwhelmed by a feeling that I was hated by God and certainly hellbound.

    See, in theory, I like that Islam emphasizes God as sovereign creator instead of warm-and-fuzzy loving Father. I like that prayer focuses on “God is the Greatest” instead of “Hey Daddy God, here are all my wittle pwoblems, please make me feel better.” As a cerebral person who doesn’t feel love easily, the former feels more right to me.

    In Islam, people are not God’s children, but his slaves. I initially found that a refreshing approach, and much easier to believe (because, seriously, it really boggles the mind to think that the great Eternal God cares a whit about little old me and my dumb little problems!). But, given the logistical difficulty of following every single little rule, in Islam, it’s super easy to fall into thinking “I’m a bad slave.”

    Which is a terrible way to think. It’s one thing to realize that you are a beloved but disobedient child. That’s a challenge; it’s convicting and encouraging at the same time. You have to do better because God your Father cares about you. But, a bad slave – what’s even the point of your existence, now. Who cares about you? You’re not even wanted. You’re just trash, like, on like a cosmic level, you are literally trash. So, in trying to try on a semi-Islamic mindset, I very quickly felt hated by God (and am still kind of battling with this). In Catholicism, this is actually a sin – despairing of God’s mercy. So, this was a major red flag to me.

    Love, while difficult, is, imo, a pretty important aspect of God, which is evident from our lived experience as human beings (love is the greatest thing we can experience, the greatest thing we are capable of, and the thing we desire most of all; why would we be designed this way if God were not, Himself, love?).

    And finally:

    1. It just didn’t make sense for me, practically. I had a creeping sense that I was following a bread-crumb trail of some knowledge not meant for me; that God had already given me the right religion; that He didn’t require me to go down a million Internet rabbit holes to find the true Faith. (YouTube really shouldn’t be where we get our religious formation.) I have a Christian husband and four little Christian children, and a great church near me. And there’s actually a scene in the Quran where some Jews come up to Muhammad and ask him to judge some conflict for them, and he points at the Torah and basically says: “that’s your judge!, why’d you come to me?” So… even Muslims believe that the Bible is a set of instructions from God for the Christian people. It just led me to believe that I already had found the right religion.

    I don’t think it should be that difficult. I don’t think God requires us to jump through a million hoops to worship Him correctly. Catholicism is the universal religion, it’s literally everywhere, in every culture.

    Sometimes I really think the Internet is a curse. We know too much. The internet is undoing the fall of the Tower of Babel. There are no more language/culture barriers. We need those. Humans aren’t designed to have that much free access to knowledge. Some things, we shouldn’t know about. Some things are dangerous for us to learn about.

    .

    I’m not going to be like one of those Christian polemicists who goes on screaming about how Islam is satanic. I don’t know for sure if it is. It has a lot of things going for it, but also some major problems. All I know is, I intend to remain Catholic.

    So, that’s my take for now. This whole experience has caused me to completely lose any amount of confidence that I had in myself, as a religious person, tbh, so, I hope I will never wander even a single theoretical hypothetical inch from Catholicism again, and never intend to, but I’m such an idiot that who’s to say. Maybe I’ll get seduced by the Ba’hai Faith next. 🙄 Good grief. We really are such fickle and stupid creatures, humans. So anyway, I’m back now, still Catholic, still weird, still filling up your WordPress feed with my nonsense.

  • three things that i love

    September 2nd, 2026

    1. randomly out of the blue remembering a song that you used to love but haven’t even thought about in like 15 years and then finding it again and it slaps harder than ever

    2. art that makes you feel personally intimately familiar with a place you’ve never actually visited

    3. the fact that music is not haram for Christians

  • “Eat Healthy”

    August 31st, 2026
    Daily writing prompt
    What’s a conspiracy theory you actually find believable?
    View all responses

    The older I get, the less trusting I am in general. Like, all through my twenties and into my early thirties, I felt pretty sure that the government genuinely had our best interests at heart — why wouldn’t they want the best for all citizens?! They themselves are citizens, after all — and that their recommendations could be trusted.

    Ha! Things are a bit different now.

    There are a number of conspiracy theories that I find believable, now, which most of you would probably laugh at because “science,” but really, isn’t “believing the science” just as much a matter of faith as religion? I’ve never seen an atom or been to outer space. I wasn’t there at the dawn of life on earth. I’m just taking The Scientists’ word for it.

    But one of these theories in particular, I’ve been dwelling on a lot in recent months, and I have become increasingly convinced of its truth. The theory is: people, especially poor people, are being actively, deliberately poisoned via our food supply.

    .

    I remember some time ago hearing about someone who believed that popular, mainstram nutritional recommendations were BS. That all of the “eat fruits and vegetables!”, “fresh produce is the best thing for you!” advice, which is drilled into our heads from infancy, was propaganda and lies. That the “Food Pyramid” / “MyPlate” stuff, which encourages eating mostly vegetables and fruits, was an evil government scheme to make people unhealthy.

    Hearing about this person’s outlandish conspiracy theory, I laughed. “That’s ridiculous,” I thought. “That’s crazy! Everyone knows fruits and veg are the best foods for your health. The Science says so.”

    But a seed had been planted in my mind, and I couldn’t forget about it.

    As you guys know, for a while now I’ve been researching and reconsidering the whole vaccine issue, and have concluded that the antivax position is more compelling than I originally thought. That’s a different story though. I bring it up because, in researching vaccines, I learned about “Big Pharma” and the fact that they are the ones funding most of these “studies” that have pro-vaccine findings. How chronic health conditions from our food and drugs lead to people’s further dependence on Big Pharma for more drugs. It’s all for proft. I learned how the billionaires benefit from us being sickly.

    And at the same time, as new parents, my husband I began paying more attention to the national grocery recall alerts, in order to stay apprised of what was safe to buy for our kids. Every day, another recall, another contaminated item on the shelves.

    Most of it, fresh fruits and vegetables.

    Apparently regulating the cleanliness of the farms that grow our food supply is just not that important to the folks in charge… or, could it be that are they doing this on purpose?

    Because here’s the other thing about produce. Unless you shell out for organic, which is easily more than twice the price (and can you really trust that little “organic” label, anyway?), so prohibitively expensive for poor people… you’re inevitably ingesting all kinds of toxic pesticides. And you can’t just wash them off, no matter how long you scrub or soak, or with what cleaning materials. (“However much you’re doing,” a former farm employee told my husband, “it’s not enough.”)

    I’ve been reading a lot about these pesticides and their effects. Everything from cancer and thyroid disease to early onset of puberty in girls — which is in itself linked to myriad physical and mental health issues.

    Early puberty (which I addressed in this post) is a huge problem and it’s getting worse. I read that in the days of early humans, girls didn’t menstruate until like 18-19. More recently in history, it was 14-15. Nowadays, it’s like 11, creeping ever lower.

    And it’s because of our food.

    Which was so enlightening for me to learn, because as a religious person I always wondered why God would design girls so that they attained physical maturity years before psychological/emotional maturity. I know not to question God’s design, but that seems like a questionable choice.

    But then I leaned: He didn’t!! This screwed-up arrangement, which damages our health and our society in a number of ways, is a result of our gross toxic diet.

    And even those of us who eat obsessively healthy, shelling out for organic everything, can’t avoid these effects entirely, because these toxins are everywhere. They’re in our environment. They’re in our bodies. Flame retardants in breastmilk. Microplastics in the placenta. It’s true. We’re so cooked, y’all.

    And where do we find most of these harmful pesticides, but on fresh produce: the very food that Big Government keeps pushing us to consume more of.

    And here’s further evidence that this war is being waged against poor people specifically. WIC, the program that provides food for low-income pregnant women and little kids, provides mostly what kind of foods?: fruits and vegetables. Also, non-organic, low-fat and fat-free dairy — some of the absolute worst food for you, hormonally, full of bovine sex hormones. This is what the government wants you to eat. (The packet WIC gives you specifically reads “Do not buy organic.”) Also, they give you a metric ton of dry cereal, like a boatload of dry cereal, which we all know is highly processed and straight trash for your health, just one big blood sugar spike in a box. Oh, and don’t get me started on the jarred baby foods!

    Not saying the government is obligated to give us organic groceries or anything! That would be entitled and absurd, and is not what I believe at all! I’m just pointing out that this is what they are encouraging, in the nutrition counseling that they offer to these poor young families; these are the only kinds of foods that are available to low-income people; WIC is concrete evidence of that.

    It’s only rich folks who can afford organic. What are poor folks to do? Growing and raising your own food seems like the only option, if you want to feed your family safely — but who can afford all that land and livestock, not to mention organic feed for said livestock? Answer: only rich people. Poor folks can’t win. There’s no way around it. Literally, it’s be poisoned, or starve. This is probably why poor folks have lower life expectancy.

    .

    So yeah, I no longer think that one person’s claims were so crazy or ridiculous. I don’t think it’s true that “fruits and vegetables are unhealthy,” per se — as a vegetarian who loves vegetables and fruit, I know how good it feels to include a lot of them in one’s diet, and surely they provide a lot of micronutrients! — but in America, for most of us, they are toxic and a major health hazard, because of all the contaminants.

    The government knows this perfectly well, and probably has all along, yet they continue to let poorly-regulated, contaminated, toxin-laden produce onto the grocery store shelves — and to pressure us, especially the poorest among us, to buy them.

    I’m don’t even identify as a “crunchy mom.” I vaccinate, I take Tylenol, I wear Bath & Body Works, and all of my babies were born in a hospital. But imo it’s become painfully obvious that we, the lower classes, are being poisoned by the big food and drug corporations, and we’re pretty powerless to do anything about it.

  • TOP 10: Things I’ve learned about Islam that made me, a TradCath, go “Huh, That’s Interesting”

    August 9th, 2026

    Let me be clear: I am NOT converting away from Catholicism! Nor will I ever be! Why would I go anywhere else when John 6:53 and we literally have the Mass right here. This post is NOT meant to be ecumenical in any way, in fact I’m pretty sure ecumenism is heresy and I don’t want to touch that with a ten-foot pole.

    No, but recently my husband and I were watching Jeopardy!, and there was a clue about Islam, and, as someone who’s interested in religion and philosophy in general, I began to think: “ya know, I don’t really actually know much about Islam at all. What do they even believe?”

    Thus began an absolutely fascinating internet rabbit hole adventure that kept me up too late and made my husband wonder why I was “brushing my teeth” in the bathroom for 45 minutes.

    Keep in mind: I can’t attest to the veracity of many of these claims, as my knowledge of Islam is pretty much limited to what I absorbed in forty-five minutes on YouTube while brushing my teeth. I have never even touched a copy of the Quran, and don’t personally know any Muslims; for all I know, many of these statements could be completely made-up; you can’t believe everything you hear on the internet, after all.

    Regardless, the following concepts made me go “Huh!, that’s interesting”:

    10. They apparently have clear rules written down right there in their book that tell them precisely how to go about every moment of their daily lives, in black and white terms. Wow! As someone who lacks an innate sense of balance when it comes to living a religious life, I can see how this would be extremely helpful. Sometimes I wish we Christians had such clear instructions. In Christianity there’s more left up for personal interpretation, which is cool, because not everyone is living the same life nor has the same disposition, and God meets us where we are. However, I also think it must be nice to be told in very plain terms exactly what you may and may not do, and when.

    9. Gender relations. Three particular details in this category blew my mind:

    • (a) apparently, women and men who are friends are not allowed to deliberately touch each other at all — they can’t even shake hands when meeting. Wow! Is it just me, or does that actually feel… extremely natural and right?! Like, tbh I always feel a bit strange when I’m introduced to a (straight) man and am expected to shake his hand. Like, um, isn’t that hand for your wife?? Like, I know what you do with that hand, and I know what straight men’s brains are like, sir, so please refrain from touching me. Only my husband gets to do that. I’ve always felt a bit neurotic and prudish for feeling this way, but evidently it’s not just me, it’s a tenet of a major world religion. Huh! I wouldn’t mind if this became a social norm in the West.
    • (b) In their churches — ahem, mosques, I guess — men and women often assemble in separate areas of the space. Segregation. This is also something that some more traditional Christian churches do, and I think it’s a cool practice, reminding us that men & women are different and should be treated as such.
    • (c) According to one video I watched, Muslim women aren’t even technically required to attend Friday prayer service!, just strongly encouraged. Wow! To me this is so interesting; while I certainly don’t disagree with the universal Sunday obligation for all Catholics, I actually don’t think it’s such a bad idea either for the expectations to be different for men and women. I’ve talked on here before about how hard it is on Catholic women to discern when they are required to go to Mass vs when they have a legitimate reason not to (pregnancy nausea, parenting littles, etc.), and it causes a lot of anguish for us. I feel like attendance being “strongly recommended” instead of “required but with exceptions” might create less stress for women (also, apparently Muslim women aren’t supposed to formally pray while on their period?!, which, ya know what, I kinda can get on board with, as I, like most women, suffer a lot and can’t be expected to do much of anything, at least not very well, on certain days of the month).

    8. Modesty standards are on point. I already mentioned in my post on women’s fashion that I personally think Islamic modesty standards for women are awesome; but here’s a chance for me to rant about it again! The Islamic definition of modesty makes way more sense than the Western one. Like, I will never understand how fitted clothes can be considered “modest;” it’s so dumb to me to see these Christian girl influencers, all with their long, beautiful hair out, posing in tight little showy outfits that they claim are “modest” just because they cover a certain amount of skin. Something that hugs the shape of your body may be beautiful and all, but it really can’t be called modest. Likewise, a little sheer lace mantilla that decorates your hair rather than covering it — I wear one because it’s normal here, but I don’t think it exactly qualifies as “modest,” technically. Showing off your figure and/or your hair isn’t modest. People be like “modesty can be sexy!”, but I’m of the opinion that “modest” and “sexy” are mutually exclusive. However, you can be both modest and pretty, which much Islamic fashion is. (And please don’t @ me telling me I “don’t get it” about modesty — I understand just fine how for some people, “modesty” means dressing in a way that honors your natural, God-given beauty without flaunting anything or drawing undue attention to yourself. I just think it’s also clear that a woman dressing this way is still subjecting herself to the male gaze, which is her decision and I’m not saying she shouldn’t be able to choose that; within reason, people can dress however they want; it just seems like this can’t properly be called “modesty.”)

    I’m not done yet! Catholic women like to talk about “Marian dress” as a modesty standard, but seem not to notice that in images of Mother Mary, she’s always got her hair covered and is draped in long, forgiving, loose-fitting garments that conceal her body, like a Muslim woman. And I take issue with the accusation that shapeless, loose-fitting clothes for women are “lazy and frumpy.” I 100% would wear a niqab, or at least a hijab (because let’s be real, we all know hair is one of the most, if not the most, eye-catching and distinguishing features of a person (what’s the first way most amateur authors describe a character’s physical appearance?), and can often make or break a person’s sexiness; no point pretending hair is a sexually neutral feature like an elbow or a nose), if it were socially acceptable for a white Catholic woman in America. The less I can be perceived and visually assessed — the freer I can be from the prison of the male gaze — the happier I am!

    7. Cleanliness standards also on point. Apparently, Muslims are required to wash themselves before praying — it’s called “wudu,” or ablutions. Even their feet! Wow. I think it’s kind of cool — of course we want to come before God as free of the stains and stink of the world as possible. “Cleanliness is next to Godliness,” as the saying goes. We Western Whites, who (according to r/Hygiene, at least) have a reputation for being the stinkiest people, could perhaps do well to consider this concept of cleanliness/hygiene as not just practical but spiritual. Fascinating.

    6. Very clear rules about music. Oh my goodness, how much easier my little life would be if we Catholics had our own version of “haram” and “halal” labels, which apparently apply to music and media as well as food. If I didn’t have to bother agonizing over what’s okay to listen to, didn’t have to bother with the hard work of discerning and reflecting and examining my conscience — if there were a clear, black-and-white “this music is forbidden” — how much easier that would be! Obviously I get why we here in the West don’t feel the need for such labels, and I love the beauty in that — important things are rarely easy, after all — but also, there are times when I feel like some strict black-and-white rules would be really helpful and make life easier. Would help those of us who suck at discerning. You know: a system that caters to the lowest common denominator, and all (it’s me, I’m the lowest common denominator).

    5. Similarly, the rules about food. I’m vegetarian anyway, and I’m all for a system of dietary laws. There absolutely should be restrictions on the manner in which animals can be slaughtered for meat, and, if we absolutely must slaughter animals, there should be a spiritual element to their slaughtering. Otherwise it’s just selfish and brutal. Muslims and Jewish folks are way ahead of us on this one!

    4. And, continuing in that same vein, the Islamic rules for fasting are way more clear and easy to follow, imo, than the Catholic ones. The whole “if necessary you may have two mini meals that together don’t add up to one meal” — what even is that?! I’m so weird about food and “meals” that I honestly don’t even know how to apply this one in my own life. Simply not ingesting anything until sundown makes so much more sense and is so much easier to follow, as well as feeling more like true fasting. I don’t suppose there’s anything wrong with me stealing this method to use during penitential seasons.

    3. Prayer positions. I saw one video where an imam was explaining why Muslims bow and prostrate themselves in prayer. It elevates the heart above the brain, demonstrating complete submission of the will and intellect. Isn’t that interesting?! I know Orthodox Christians do bowing and prostration too. We Catholics prefer kneeling upright, which I personally prefer because sticking your butt in the air is embarrassing imo. The only time I see a prostrate position during Catholic ritual is at ordinations to the Priesthood, and then they lay flat on their faces, so it’s a bit different. I kind of like this physical gesture, in theory, though. Humans are both soul and body after all, the two irrevocably intertwined (as much as I hate to admit it, given my issues with my body, lol!), and it makes sense to pray with our body too. “As we believe, so we pray,” said one of the Sisters who taught my kids’ Catechism class; I feel like elevating the heart above the head for prayer is kind of a cool example of that.

    2. Specific, mandated prayer times! Again, for an undisciplined, forgetful, lazy, unstable, and irrational-minded person like myself, having mandatory prayer times sounds extremely helpful! “Figure it out for yourself”/ “do it whenever works for you” is pretty unhelpful, for me, who didn’t grow up religious and has struggled to figure out how to be so. Better Catholics with more discipline probably can’t relate, but, I kinda love the idea of pre-scheduled prayer times being non-negotiable.

    1. Emphasis on our enslavement to God (“Allah”) rather than God as our loving Heavenly Father. Interesting! Obviously, I believe God is our loving Heavenly Father — Jesus Himself said so. I also think that many Christians in the modern West would do well to remember that He isn’t just our friendly “Daddy God” (🤮) but infinitely greater than we are, and has no need of us, and that He has no obligation to make sense to us or to make us happy. Like I said, I haven’t read the Quran, so I can’t really say much on how Muslims feel about Allah in comparison to how we feel about God, but, I just heard this difference briefly explained in a video, and I can appreciate this POV; it’s a helpful reminder for anyone of any religion, I should think.

    .

    So yeah, like I said, I’m not interested in converting or anything — why would I be — I just think these elements of their belief system are super interesting, and there are some elements that I think I’d even like to borrow and apply to a Catholic lifestyle. Which, as far as I can tell, is not an ecumenical/heretical thing to say, and I hope I haven’t accidentally sinned anywhere in this post. This was just a fun little learning adventure for little old me, is all, and rather enlightening to see some of the similarities and differences between this other religion/culture and my own, that might actually help me be a better Catholic.

  • I don’t care anymore.

    August 8th, 2026

    As I prepare to turn 37 next month, I feel like this blog is shifting gears slightly.

    For the last couple years, during my transition from normie Catholic to TradCath, I’ve had a sort of identity crisis, trying to figure out how I fit into this new world, and what of myself I was allowed to keep – hence this blog, with all the Questions That Keep Me Up At Night. I’m not discontinuing that column or anything – rest assured, there have always been, and will always be, questions that keep me up at night! – but, it may look a little different, going forward.

    For one, because I guess I’m kind of over the identity crisis and the panic of “is it okay for me to be xyz??”.

    It’s almost like I have at last figured out how to look at the world – like I’ve had my lenses adjusted or something.

    I don’t know what caused me to finally get over all that. No amount of blog posts nor exposure therapy nor pep talks that I gave myself ever had any reassuring effect, when it comes to my Catholic identity. Nothing calmed the turmoil. It’s like my brain just suddenly … got tired of it.

    And it’s not like I don’t care what others think of me, in general. I very much still do, thanks to the ol’ AVPD and all, and have accepted that this is something I will always deal with.

    Social interactions will always be stressful. But maybe some of the philosophical underpinnings are falling away. By that I mean, instead of freaking out because “I don’t belong here because I am a bad person because of xyz,” now I’m freaking out simply because socializing is stressful.

    It’s interesting. For a while now I’ve been like “why have I not felt compelled to post a million QTKMUANs and Rants lately?”. And only weeks later have realized that perhaps that’s a good sign.

    Whether I’m allowed to be this way or that way or not, just hasn’t been on my mind much. It feels like the quiet after a storm, up in there, now. Almost like whatever was tormenting me, trying to get me to give up and go back to the NO, just got tired of trying and abruptly packed up and left.

    Plus, I’m not on Instagram anymore, and have drastically reduced my social media use, which means I’m not as exposed to all the shit that used to piss me off and make me want to write all those posts.

    Although they’re far from resolved in my life, I’ve reached a point of relative peace and acceptance about issues such as vaccines, music, entertainment, lifestyle, femininity/the tradwife vocation, family planning, and other such things that have been “hot topics” on this blog for the last couple years. I’ve pretty much figured out how I feel about these things now, and have adopted what I believe is the correct way to think about them. So they just aren’t taking up as much mental real estate, anymore.

    And anyway, I begin to think that maybe being conflicted, being a misfit, in one’s religious community, is neither abnormal nor even that big of a problem.

    (all memes on this site are from Pinterest)

    So I just don’t feel as much need to come on here and bluster and argue with the inner voices. Because the inner voices have moved on. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure there will be more blustering and arguing to come!, just probably less of it, and dealing with more random and scattered topics less relevant to Catholic identity and How I Ought To Be.

    I’ve considered just getting rid of this whole dumb blog, tbh. Or at least deleting a ton of old posts. But I don’t quite want to – not yet, anyway.

    The things that keep me up at night now are things I probably should have started worrying about years and years ago – namely, the kids’ education and formation.

    As I’ve mentioned lately, this summer as I’ve been planning our school year and delving into pedagogy, I’ve overhauled our life a bit, removing the TV and a lot of clutter, and also just adjusted the way I think about parenting.

    It’s like now that I have the correct lenses, now that I’ve figured out how to see things, it’s on to the practical matter of doing those things.

    Be not mistaken!, I am neither enlightened nor any less of a trash person than I ever was – nor do I plan to post any less than I’ve been doing. It’s just like I’ve kinda come full circle from “wow, the folks at church are great people, I love it here!!” to “holy shit, they are doing it right and I am doing it wrong, I will never fit in with them because I’m a terrible person for all of these reasons, how the hell can I possibly go here,” all the way back around to “the folks at church sure are great people, I love it here!”.

    Frankly, it’s almost boring, not having so much turmoil. But fear not!, I always come up with something to worry about. There aren’t many things I’m great at, but coming up with shit to worry about is one of ‘em! Stay tuned!

  • friend crush

    August 2nd, 2026

    To the 30something trad baddie at church today with the dark hair, wrist tattoos, chunky black boots, and the passel of unruly 5-and-unders: heyyy! clearly you and I have some things in common, like for one, we both believe in the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, but, umm, do you also believe in Platonic love at first sight? Is it just me, or is the feeling mutual? I was eyeing you during Mass in my peripheral, distracted by your incredible vibe, fantasizing about us talking for hours, swapping our secrets and recipes, giggling like preteens, yapping about the tradwife life, commiserating sometimes, maybe shopping for modest church dresses and homeschool curricula together, babysitting for each other, just helping each other get through it… maybe one day we’ll even be godmothers to each others’ kids?!? Idk, maybe it could be me & you against this world and we’ll live happily ever after? So like, do you already have a bff, orrrr….? Check yes or no. Or not. It’s cool. Nvm.

  • The Presentation: a sestina (plus, a lengthy preamble about poetry)

    August 1st, 2026

    Click here to skip the preamble and jump straight to the sestina.

    Ah, poetry. How do you guys feel about it? Let’s discuss.

    Typically, I do not write poetry. For several reasons. The first being that fiction is simply more fun for me, both to read and to write. Probably I should try to get more into poetry, because as a busy mom it’s hard to find time to write whole novels anymore, and it’d be easier to focus on one single poem at a time. (Long ago, on day one of poetry 101 at my liberal arts college, the professor told our class that she used to be a novelist until she had kids – then she became a poet.) But fiction is just so much more fun, isn’t it?

    The second reason being that poetry is so much easier to fail at – and the failure, vastly much more embarrassing. Mediocre prose is embarrassing, but easier to get away with if you have moments where it’s good. You can still salvage it. In poetry, one weak moment makes the whole thing shit.

    And poetry as a medium is so much more honest and raw, like, there’s nowhere to hide, in poetry, so if you do it poorly, it’s just mortifying. Sharing a bad poem is like if you tried to sing a beautiful ballad but ended up just forcing everyone to watch you ugly-cry alone in the spotlight. If you were trying to act flirty and alluring for someone, and then farted. Just horrifying.

    When I do read poetry, I prefer, with few exceptions, older poems – the kind with distinct rhyme, meter, and/or form. My all-time favorites are “Heaven-Haven” by Gerard Manley Hopkins and, of course, “The Lake Isle of Innisfree” by William Butler Yeats. Also a big fan of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.

    Generally, I have found that I really struggle to connect with the contemporary style of free verse – it just doesn’t make sense to me, unless it’s rhythmic enough to get stuck in your head like a catchy tune. (See: “Blue Poles” by Inger Christensen, “O Cheese” by Donald Hall.)

    I dunno. Most poetry these days reads to me like prose with a bunch of arbitrary line breaks and a flippant disregard of basic grammar:

    I went 
    to the grocery
    Store
    I needed to buy
    oranges, but
    they were
    Out
    of oranges, and so I
    bought
    Clementines

    … this is how it sounds to me, lol. No offense to any free verse poets reading this! You guys clearly have a poetic sensibility that I’m lacking, is what I’m trying to say. 

    I guess I’m a very primitive and basic type of person. A cavewoman. I don’t care for all this artsy, highfalutin stuff. I like things that feel good in my body, and/or that make me go “oooh! neat!”

    (And the truth is, I used to write free verse myself, back in my teens and early twenties – just pages of emotional vomit punctuated by a bunch of arbitrary line breaks that I thought made it sound “cool” and “artistic.” Then I realized how bad it was, and stopped writing it. Maybe that’s why I’m so allergic to this style of poetry – even the good stuff gives me secondhand embarrassment for the poet, because it reminds me of the embarrassing trash that I wrote when I was an angsty teen.)

    Structure feels safer. Poetic form forgives a multitude of sins, imo, and it’s harder to be cringey if you’re following a set of preexisting rules. For the last thirteen-plus years, the only poems that I have written have been sestinas, and the occasional sonnet. I especially love sestinas. Was introduced to them in the aforementioned poetry class in college, and fell in love, and never looked back.

    I don’t think I’m that great at them or anything, but they sure are fun, kind of like a little word puzzle — very addictive. I used to write one a week, back in the days of MiTHology 2.0, as you may remember. I just love them! It’s so cool to see how all the pieces fit together. It makes my idiot brain go “oooh, neat!”.

    I don’t write them much anymore, but below you will find my most recent one. Full disclosure, I actually wrote this one in hopes of submitting it to a certain beautiful, esteemable journal of Catholic poetry. “It’s a journal for Catholic poems,” I thought – “how could this not be a good fit!” However, upon further digging, I learned that this journal does not want “devotional/inspirational” poems.

    Huh. Okay. Well, I honestly don’t even think mine counts as “devotional” or “inspirational” … but, it does express awe and wonder at the Divine, in an overtly Catholic way, so, hmm… just to be sure, I went and looked at the kind of stuff they publish, to see if mine would fit well there.

    And guess what. It was all, without exception, free verse. None of it made sense to me at all. Just, whoosh!, right over my head. Waves of secondhand embarrassment, and flashbacks to eighth grade. Plus none of it was actually explicitly Catholic. Too much subtlety for me!

    All of which led me to believe that this little thing I made would not be a good fit for that particular publication. As usual, my stuff doesn’t quite fit anywhere. Womp womp.

    So I’m putting it here, because frankly I spent a good amount of mental energy on it, and don’t want that to go to waste. I suppose I could have gone ahead and submitted it just in case, but to be honest with you, I recently received a form rejection on a novel manuscript from a different Catholic publisher, and I’m just not feeling resilient enough for another rejection right now. So, whatever. At risk of looking like I’m ugly-crying in the spotlight, or farting while flirting, I’m putting this thing here, on my little personal blog, for you to see. Hey, at least here no editor can reject me! Without further ado.


    The Presentation: a mom prays the fourth joyful mystery

    Nothing that was yours was really yours.
    Some basic clothes, perhaps – really, nothing.
    The consecrated virgin knows no “mine”
    except whatever modest food she’s given
    and space to live, though you never did belong –
    a misfit among sinners, too like the Father,

    to Whom so young by your mother and father
    you were presented: your parents, no longer yours
    now. In the temple, heaven's shadow, you belonged
    from infancy, gentle hands holding nothing
    but other hands, and prayers, all freely given
    to God Who looked with love and called you Mine.

    But didn't you ever desire something “mine”?
    Was your pure heart ever tempted to ask the Father
    because if you had asked He'd surely give
    His favorite daughter one thing to be yours?
    Or was the gift the clarity of nothing?
    And was the home the nowhere-to-belong?

    And then there's me. For years I longed and longed
    and then, at last, she came, and she was mine
    my very own, my treasure, as no thing
    could be, even more mine than her father's.
    How gravity and the flesh resist the “Yours”,
    resent returning to Him what He has given.

    Thy will be done, but still, please let me give
    them everything on earth, for they belong
    to me. Are me. The soul admits they're Yours
    but all the while the flesh screams mine, mine, mine,
    surrenders, then pulls them back – not yet, Father.
    The last truth is that I will yield nothing.

    But, a poor and simple girl possessed nothing
    until the perfect Son Who was given
    to her only, not even an earthly father
    to share him with. At last: something belonged
    to you. You could have said, This precious one is Mine
    the Alpha and the Omega, entirely yours.

    But from your Heavenly Father you withheld nothing.
    “Here He is,” all yours, to Him freely given
    to Whom He belonged, and Whom you could have called “mine.”
  • The mystery of the curve

    July 27th, 2026
    Daily writing prompt
    What’s a song lyric that has stuck with you forever?
    View all responses

    All the time, on this stupid little blog, I’m yapping about my terrible taste in music. And it’s true, I like a lot of really bad songs. But guess what! I like some good ones too. One of them is this:

    It’s called “Five Colors” by Sam Phillips, in case the above embedded video isn’t working for you.

    I know absolutely nothing about Sam Phillips, so if you’re looking to learn about her, sorry, move along. This is actually the only song of hers that I know. According to Google, this album was released in 2001, which makes sense because that’s approximately when I became aware of it, or soon thereafter. I was in middle school (’01-’04), and my parents owned the CD, so I’d hear it sometimes in my mom’s car.

    Middle school was around the time my social anxiety/AVPD began to amp up to adult levels. In a way it was even worse, back then, than it is now, because at that age you haven’t developed any defenses yet, and minor things still seem huge, in that childlike way. Yeah, middle school sucked. I don’t remember the first time I heard this song. It was just there, in my house; it seemed like it had been around for a long time. I always found it soothing. I have a distinct memory of listening to it and like intentionally memorizing the words and installing them into my brain prior to this big social event in seventh grade, because hearing it made me physically relax, made me feel like everything was going to be okay. Something about its peaceful sound — but also the lyrics, somehow, although I couldn’t really make much sense of them at that age.

    A twelve-year-old’s brain is an impressionable thing, and things inscribed upon it tend to stick there for life. This song has stuck with me for life. And I don’t even listen to it that often — almost never, tbh. It just kind of lives in my brain. (You may have seen me mention it on this blog before.) It pops back up at random times. Specifically, those lingering last two lines:

    “I tried, but can’t find refuge in the angle

    I’ll walk the mystery of the curve.”

    I dunno about you guys, but for me, those lines pretty much sum it up, this whole “life” situation. In my experience, it’s been thirty-six years of repeatedly seeking refuge in the angle, in one way or another, only to eventually have to resign myself to walking the mystery of the curve.

    Things are rarely as black-and-white as I’d like for them to be. The senseless, incomprehensible nature of being alive is, to put it lightly, frightening. Angles are comforting. We can explain them. Curves, though, are unknowable. Pi goes on forever. Like, what even is that. How is something as essential as a simple circle so mysterious?

    Life is, essentially, crazy. I keep having to accept that.

    But isn’t this incompatible with my TradCath POV? Au contraire. Some people like to accuse organized religion of trying to find refuge in the angle — of trying to put God in a nice angular little box. This is only true of those who are doing organized religion wrong.

    As I was recently talking about in my post on C.S. Lewis’s Till We Have Faces, we humans can’t have a healthy attitude towards God unless we accept how terrifyingly unfathomable are His ways. Our little minds aren’t capable of fathoming Him. Innocent people suffer, and for what? “A loving God would never allow this!” — it seems that way to us, but God is way too big for us to understand.

    It isn’t always nice. There isn’t always an upside. I don’t believe that “all things happen for a reason.” Some things are just purely bad, by our own standards. Yet God is good. How can that be?

    Things rarely make sense. Accepting our smallness, our powerlessness, the mind-bending horror and brutality of life, the unknowability of God, or of anything important, really — this is a necessary part of being religious. Of being human. This, imo, is what Sam Phillips was getting at.

    And so it keeps coming back to me. Still, twenty-five years after first hearing it, this song soothes me. Still, it pops back into my mind at odd times, like a friendly remimder, as life proves its lyrics true again and again and again. I’ll walk the mystery of the curve, it says, while the peaceful, simple melody suggests to me that that’s not necessarily such a bad thing.

  • Healing is possible you guys

    July 24th, 2026

    Having some trail mix (then): Okay. Deep breath. Here we are. The time has come. The long awaited moment. Time for the serving of trail mix that I’ve been planning since last week. I get to have some trail mix! Carefully measure out three tablespoons. Scoop carefully to make sure it’s an even distribution of the different items bc if it’s too heavy on the raisins the calorie/sugar content will be higher than the label says, too many nuts = fat content higher, etc., and we have to stay on track here. Level tablespoons, don’t be a piggy now, you fat fuck. Make that scant tablespoons, to be on the safe side. Scrape some off the top. There. Ok. Here’s one serving. Now, I will begin with the boring raisins and peanuts as like a penance before getting to the coveted cashews and chocolate chunks. This is a process. This is the moment. This is all we get, right here. Slowly, one peanut at a time, to really draw out this experience, because even the boring bits are a decadent treat, and it’s exactly this many hours before we may eat again. Ok, now we have arrived at the good part. Soon we will get to eat a cashew. Here is the cashew. Savor it. Ew, you’re so disgusting for savoring it. What the fuck is wrong with you. Piggy. The serving is gone now. You’re still hungry?! After trail mix??! Why are you so fucking fat. Kill yourself. Better get the last crumbs because this is all you get. Ew, what kind of fatty licks the crumbs?! If they could see you now! Despicable! Ok, same time tomorrow? Shall we make this a daily habit? Shall we make 11AM 3Tbsp of trail mix a rule which, if broken, makes your whole day ruined and you an irredeemable failure? We shall!, whether you like it or not!. Now, go walk it off, fatty.

    Having some trail mix (now): hungry. food time? food time. hmm. what’s this? ooh, trail mix. that’ll do. dump in bowl. looks like a lot. probably won’t finish. mm, cashews and chocolate chunks. take those first. yum. i wonder why they’re called ‘cashews’. funny. hm, looks like all the good bits are gone. now it’s just peanuts and raisins, boring. oh well, getting full anyway. Oh wait I had to go do that other thing i forgot about i’ll just leave this bowl here on the counter maybe i’ll

  • You know you’re getting old when

    July 23rd, 2026

    you’re sunk in the sofa beside your husband at night, bathrobes on, snacks out, fully vegetating, kids finally asleep, and you’re both transfixed, positively slack-jawed watching this whole stolen lego saga on youtube (fr though, are you guys seeing this?!), & it gets to the part where they’re out in friggen utah and the mormon mafia are on their tails, pulling them over repeatedly for literally no reason, just being bullies, going off about imaginary heroin & “not coming to a complete stop” & etc. etc., & sheesh, seeing all of this, your honest, immediate reaction that comes spouting up from your withered millennial heart and out your agèd mouth is “Why are they being so mean to them?! They’re just a bunch of 30-year-old kids!”

    (& I remember when i thought 25 was full blown adult)

1 2 3 … 19
Next Page→

Proudly powered by WordPress

Loading Comments...