Skip to content
    • — about/contact —
    • — hello —
    • — latest —
    • screaming into the void
    • baking shows
    • little stories

MiTHology (4.0)

  • Is it ok to separate the artist from the art?

    August 4th, 2025

    (Caution: spoilers for Sandman season two!)

    I ask this today because, currently, my husband and I are watching, and really enjoying, season two of The Sandman. But this is not the first time I’ve had the occasion to worry about this particular question.

    As you may know, I’m a huge fan of David Foster Wallace, whom some people out there claim ought to be “canceled” because of certain shitty things that he did to people during his life. I’m also a fan of certain songs by Chris Brown, as well as makeup products and tutorials by Jeffree Star, both of whom have also done shitty things in the past. I’m sure that plenty more of my favorite writers/celebrities have done problematic, cancel-worthy things, but these are just the few that come to mind at the moment.

    Am I a bad person for continuing to allow myself to enjoy The Sandman? (The show specifically, not the books; I did read the first book or two, back in like 2015, because my boyfriend at the time (who’s now my husband) was a huge fan of the series; I thought they were pretty cool, but they didn’t captivate me enough to want to read the rest; plus, the bf admitted to me that he’d long had a crush on the character Death, which obviously pissed me off and turned me off from the whole series, lol.) Am I a bad person for continuing to enjoy DFW, Chris Brown, and Jeffree Star, even though I know they’ve done inexcusable things? Can we separate the artist from the art? Or, more importantly, should we?

    .

    I have a lot of things I could say about The Sandman from a Catholic POV – how sometimes it completely misses (it presents an inaccurate picture of God and religion in general, and also, it unfortunately gets pretty woke), but other times gets it beautifully right (like with the character of Fiddler’s Green, who’s inspired by the brilliant Catholic writer G.K. Chesterton; or like with some of the ideas about heaven and hell and who goes to hell and why; or like that scene in season two where the Pope “approves female priests” (I was starting to throw up a little in my mouth) and then we see that the “Pope” is actually Loki in disguise and the real Pope is locked up in a faerie-dust-induced coma somewhere, lol; that was actually not too far from accurate, I mean obviously Loki is fictional, but it is true that evil, the smoke of satan, has corrupted the heart of the Church!). But, I won’t go into all of that here, because the question at hand is not whether the show is good, but whether it’s okay to like this show at all, knowing that its author is probably guilty of sexually assaulting multiple women. (I say “probably” because I don’t know if it was ever definitively “proven” that he did, and I like to always give people the benefit of the doubt; but I did read that the evidence against him is really strong, and that he apparently even paid large sums of money to multiple people to get them to keep quiet about him, which really doesn’t look good for him, unfortunately.)

    Can we separate the artist from the art? Well, whether one can or not is subjective, isn’t it?

    For me, in the case of The Sandman, I both can and cannot. I’m still able to enjoy the show. I’m enjoying it very much! But, at the same time, I can’t really forget, even while watching the show, about the allegations. Like, the whole plot thread about the Lady Nuala being “gifted” to Morpheus to do with whatever he liked… knowing that that was written by a dude who SAs women, kinda gave me the ick. Pretty much all of the sexual scenes gave me an extra bit of ick, honestly. I already dislike sex scenes, but they’re even more repulsive when you know that they originated in the mind of a rapist.

    So, my enjoyment of the art is definitely colored by what I know about the artist. But, for me personally, it’s not to the point where I can’t enjoy the art. Because it’s also a really compelling story, and I have to know what happens! I guess if the story were less good, it wouldn’t be worth sitting through the moments where I remember and get the ick; but for me, in this case, it balances out.

    However, I imagine if I were a family member of one of his victims, I’m sure I wouldn’t be able to tolerate it at all. If I were the mother of one of those victims, there’s no way I could stand to watch even a single second of this show, or to read a single word of anything NG ever wrote! Or if I were myself a survivor of SA, I might have a stronger reaction.

    But, shouldn’t I – as a Christian especially! – be so empathetic as to be unable to tolerate anything NG ever wrote? Isn’t it a moral failing that I’m not disgusted enough to boycott The Sandman? I ought to love my fellow humans so much that their suffering is personal to me, even if they’re not my daughter or myself. Right?

    .

    Another example people like to bring up w/r/t the whole artist/art separation issue is Hitler’s paintings. We all know that Hitler painted pictures, and that he applied to art school and was rejected. If you’ve ever seen his pictures, you know that they’re really not bad. They’re technically very good. They’re kind of soulless, lacking a certain vitality or warmth or emotion or something, but as architectural drawings, they’re very nice!

    Is it okay to look at, for example, Hitler’s painting of Neuschwanstein Castle, and enjoy it? It’s a pretty picture. I wouldn’t hang it on my wall or anything, but, what if someone else wanted to? What if someone else just really likes a nice technically-proficient but heartless painting of a building? Would it be a moral failing for that person, knowing who the artist was and what he did, to purchase a print of that painting, frame it, and hang it on the wall in their house? There was an episode about this in season one of Justified, actually!: there was a character who was an avid collector of Hitler paintings, and yes, the guy was a scumbag! But, in theory, could you enjoy Hitler’s artwork without being a scumbag yourself? I’m not sure; I kind of think not. His crimes were so horrific that I really can’t see how anyone with an iota of knowledge of history could possibly separate the artist from the art, in that case.

    But shouldn’t I feel the same way about NG as I do about Hitler? – Is the former as bad as the latter? I think not. Hitler is like the go-to example when talking about moral problems, but perhaps it’s not fair to always compare people to him. Even if so, does that make it okay to enjoy The Sandman, just because raping several people isn’t as objectively bad as murdering zillions of them?

    Should we permit ourselves to separate artist from art, even if we can? Shouldn’t we boycott content from bad people on principle, even if we’re tempted to enjoy it because it’s fun?

    On this same note, let’s think about Chris Brown. Super talented artist! I’m pretty obsessed with some of his songs. I still listen to them, even knowing what he did to Rihanna. Is that a moral failing on my part? Shouldn’t I be so horrified by his actions that I just can’t stomach the sound of his voice? I imagine, if I were Rihanna’s mom, I’d feel that way; but shouldn’t I, as a mom of girls – as a Christian – as a human being!! – have that reaction anyway?! I probably should.

    But, even if I’m not repulsed by the sound of his voice, shouldn’t I boycott his music on principle, because I know it’s the right thing to do?

    This one, I’m not so sure about. Chris Brown, DFW, and Jeffree Star: these are all people who, as I personally see it, made mistakes in their past which they regretted. They have dark pasts, they were deeply troubled – which is not an excuse for hurting others, not at all, because you can be a troubled person without hurting others; but it does explain why they behaved the way they did, because people who are hurt do tend to hurt others. It’s not right, but it’s a common symptom. But, such people can grow and change and see where they messed up and work on themselves and be better. Which I know Jeffree and Chris both did. (DFW, I’m not sure about the details, but I know that he was in a committed monogamous relationship at the time of his death, which I’ve read was healthy and unproblematic; and from what I’ve read about him, he didn’t exactly feel great about the way he’d handled his earlier relationships.) People like this, repentant sinners, I find it easier to empathize with and forgive than someone like Hitler. So, I’m not sure if I agree that these people deserve to be canceled. NG doesn’t seem like a repentant sinner, though. To the best of my knowledge, he’s basically admitted to being an asshole, but not to committing any crimes. He probably does deserve to be canceled.

    So why am I not participating in the canceling? Why am I still loving this show so much?

    .

    What are my motivations here, anyway?

    There are certain celebrities that I cannot stomach because of their nasty behavior. Mr. Maroon 5, for example, and Marilyn Manson. However, this may be more of a personal distaste issue than a moral issue.

    Yes, it was gross that Mr. Maroon 5 cheated on his pregnant wife; but, I still like to listen to Gavin Rossdale, who also cheated on his wife, which makes me think maybe it’s not that I’m so repulsed by cheaters, but rather that Mr. Maroon 5 as a performer has this weaselish and squirmy persona, and sounds like a goose when he sings, while Gavin Rossdale has literally the best singing voice of any male out there, and seems like a cool person otherwise. Similarly, Marilyn Manson: he’s done some disgusting stuff, yes, but that only augments my pre-existing dislike of his music. It’s just not my cup of tea.

    And meanwhile, I’m a big fan of Ronnie Radke, who obviously has done some bad shit in the past, for which everyone still wants to cancel him. I will defend him to the death though! He seems like a really smart and good-hearted person who keeps things real (yes, his roast reels are kind of unhinged, but come on, as a rock star it’s his job to be unhinged and entertaining; plus, people shouldn’t start shit online if they don’t want to get roasted, lol, Ronnie never comes for people without being provoked). I’d put him in the “repentant sinners” category mentioned above, because he did his time for the mistakes of his youth, and nowadays he does a lot of good for people and for the music industry at large.

    However: this makes me wonder: am I biased here because Gavin Rossdale and Ronnie Radke are both very beautiful people, while Marilyn Manson and Adam Levine are not? I wonder if I’m letting aesthetics color my perception. I know it’s been proven that people tend to perceive attractive people as smarter, better, and more capable, and to perceive ugly people as dumber and worse all-around. I’m pretty sure I’m being fair here, but I have to wonder. It’s like how, if you kill an earthworm, it’s fine, no one cares, but if you kill a butterfly you’re a sick and nasty person and why would you do that. But is the worm really any worse than the butterfly?

    .

    Anyway.

    Long story short, I do not know if it’s a moral failing that I’m watching, and really enjoying, The Sandman season two.

    Maybe some might argue that it’s actually a good thing, to be able to appreciate the good products of someone who’s otherwise bad. Isn’t that how God sees us, after all? God sees both the bad and the good in us, and loves us regardless of our behavior. And a good, virtuous action always glorifies God, even if the person who did it has also done a lot of bad actions. And producing a beautiful work of art is a good action. Good inspirations don’t come from our corrupt humanity; they come from God, and they teach us about God. So, maybe it’s not bad to be able to enjoy a work of good art created by a bad person.

    There are things Good and True and Beautiful in The Sandman, as also in Infinite Jest and other stories by DFW. It would be sad and misguided to just chuck all of these stories in the trash because they came from sources that are corrupted – which we all are, to a certain extent, after all.

    So if I had to attempt to make a conclusion here, which I’m not sure I can, I’d say that, well, maybe it’s a matter of balance?: if it’s a really good piece of art, and the artist who made it has any redeeming qualities or humanity left in them – then, perhaps, there’s nothing necessarily morally wrong with being able to enjoy their work (although it’s certainly understandable that some people would prefer not to). But in the case of someone like Hitler, where the artwork is just okay and the evil he committed is so incomprehensibly staggering and cold-blooded and large-scale, then you’d probably have to be a pretty messed-up person to really enjoy his art.

    I don’t think you can really call someone a bad person for enjoying the works of Neil Gaiman or Chris Brown – as long as the fan in question isn’t making excuses for the bad behavior of those artists. We can recognize that they did something evil and that the art they made is good. Such is life. Sinful people can still do good things and create good things.

  • a birth story.

    July 28th, 2025

    As you may have noticed, I haven’t posted on this blog in over a month – not because I’m done with blogging, but because I was busy having a baby. My fourth kid was born earlier this month. Now, I don’t typically like to share a lot about physical stuff. But I thought I’d share my birth story on here, because for the first time I feel like I got it right, and am actually proud of how it went, and feel like it could potentially be useful to someone.

    In the third trimester I spent a lot of time reading birth stories as I tried to mentally prepare myself; so, I figure I’ll pay it forward or whatever and go ahead and share mine for any mom out there who might happen to be reading this as she prepares for her own birth.

    .

    Four days before my son was born, I went to confession, which I try to do every two-to-three weeks regularly. This time, the priest was one that I’d never been to confession with before. And for penance, he assigned me a prayer I’d never been assigned before, in my ten years of being Catholic: the Anima Christi prayer.

    Of course I was familiar with the prayer, but it wasn’t one that I had memorized or anything. So as soon as Mass was over, I looked it up and prayed it and studied it. I was 39 weeks pregnant, and really nervous about labor for some reason, even though this was my fourth baby. I thought to myself: maybe this prayer will be a good tool to bring into labor. I repeated the first three lines over and over in my mind on the drive home, and over the coming days.

    Why was I so nervous about birth? If you’ve read my post on epidurals, you already know a little about my previous three birth experiences. I’d never had a purely unmedicated, all-natural birth. My first was an induction, and even though I didn’t get an epidural, I did get IV pain meds to help me cope (fentanyl, and it didn’t even help much anyway, lol). My second was surgical. My third, my VBAC1, I had intended to go all-natural, but got discouraged and gave up, and ended up getting an epidural right at transition. So I was haunted by feelings of failure and inferiority, like I was not a real mom somehow.

    Was I going to be able to do it this time? Doubt. Maybe I shouldn’t even bother trying. I’d been reading “Made For This” by Mary Haseltine, as well as re-reading Ina May’s guide, and feeling called out and accused by every word on the pages, feeling like a failure as a woman and a Catholic; I was sure that I would end up tapping out again. I couldn’t do it; I already knew that. But, Mary Haseltine suggests embracing that: accepting and admitting that we can’t do it on our own, and totally surrendering to God. I didn’t know if I could do that or not.

    The same author also suggested offering up your labor for a specific intention. I figured I could do that, in any case. I read a lot of advice and tried to internalize it all. Basically, I lost a lot of sleep, and said a lot of prayers. I tried to focus on preparing myself mentally. Because I knew that having an all-natural birth would be more of a psychological than physical feat.

    I had certain expectations. I expected that I would go into labor on or around my due date, which was the coming Saturday. I expected that it would be very similar to my labor with my third, which began slowly, with very mild contractions that gradually intensified. I expected that it would be slow and grueling. For personal reasons, I did not want to have a baby on Wednesday; that was incredibly important to me, and I’d lost sleep over this too. Any day but Wednesday! (Don’t ask me why.) I’d do anything to avoid having a baby on Wednesday!

    Then, Tuesday night, out of nowhere, my water broke.

    Well, I say “out of nowhere,” but it wasn’t really. I guess I hadn’t recognized the signs. I’ll describe some of those signs just in case you’re curious.

    I had gestational diabetes in this pregnancy, which was easily diet-controlled, and I’d noticed for the past week that my glucose numbers had suddenly dropped a lot. Things that typically spiked my blood sugar no longer did. It was like I could suddenly throw caution to the winds, with food, if I wanted to; I was actually afraid my monitor was broken or something. Apparently, this is a sign that labor is about to start. But I didn’t want to believe it.

    Also, I’d been queasy for days, with a very low appetite, experiencing waves of nausea that got a little worse on Tuesday. I thought nothing of this, because I’d had a stomach bug at 38 weeks, which had me incapacitated for two or three days, and after it passed, I simply didn’t fully recover. The nausea stuck around. It was like I was back in the first trimester. I assumed I was just having a hard time shaking the stomach bug.

    And I was in an absolutely shitty mood, that Tuesday. I had no patience, snapped at the slightest provocation, was irritable with my kids, and generally a crappy mom. It was like PMS. But, I assumed that it was just fatigue, and the damned stomach bug getting to me.

    Despite feeling like crap, I also had this mad wave of productivity on Tuesday afternoon. I had to clean the upstairs. There was going to be a baby sleeping there soon, I needed to clean it! So I went into a cleaning frenzy for a few hours, and got the whole upstairs relatively sparkling (for a house with two toddlers and a kindergartener, that is). I assumed this was just normal third trimester nesting.

    So those were the warning signs that I was ignoring. I assumed I had more time. I hadn’t even finished packing my hospital bag! Like I said, I was expecting to have plenty of warning before time to head to the hospital; with my third, I was in early labor for about a day and a half before I even felt uncomfortable. I was waiting to pack stuff until the actual signs of labor showed up.

    Well, but then, like I said, at about a quarter to nine, my water broke.

    What the hell? What the helly?! This had never happened to me before. With my first, my water didn’t break until I was already having painful contractions, and then it was only a cautious trickle; my third, the OB manually broke my water at seven centimeters, to move things along. I had never before experienced this Hollywood-esque moment of being surprised by a sudden gush of water out of nowhere. And on Tuesday night, of all nights?!

    There went my plans! So much for not having a baby on Wednesday. I was GBS positive2, so I knew that I had to get to the hospital ASAP, and that there was no way this baby would be arriving any later than a day from now, but also no way they’d be arriving before midnight tonight.

    I’d also been hoping that labor might, for once, not happen overnight; I was really hoping it’d start during the day this time, when I was awake and alert, so that I wouldn’t be going into it with zero energy; but alas, here we were again.

    It did not bode well. Furthermore, I wasn’t even having painful contractions yet. I knew from reading zillions of birth stories that it was almost never good when water broke without contractions. That generally meant that Pitocin3 would be needed to move things along; providers don’t like to wait too long to deliver a baby once water has broken, because of the risk of infection. I’d never had Pitocin in labor before (my previous induction was with Cytotec 4), and I wanted to keep it that way. We’ve all heard the horror stories about how painful Pitocin contractions are. I knew that, if I had to suffer through those, I’d probably end up getting an epidural, which would probably slow things down, and the cascade of interventions would begin, and I could very well end up in the OR. (I hated my c-section, and did not want to go through that again.)

    So I chucked a few things in my hospital bag (not enough, lol I forgot quite a few things) and we were off, in a mild panic. But my anxiety and dread were balanced out by an even greater excitement. For better or for worse, it was happening; I’d get to meet this baby soon.

    But at the hospital, it was kind of a cluster. The nurses couldn’t find their equipment. They accidentally clicked “discharge” on their computer and checked me out of the hospital and had to re-check me in. Then they couldn’t find my vein to start the IV (that’s always fun). Nothing seemed to be going right. It was almost ten, and I still wasn’t having painful contractions. I really had no idea how this was going to go.

    So I said a little prayer of surrender, trying to let go of all my personal wants and desires for how the birth would proceed. Then, between interruptions, I prayed the sorrowful mysteries of the Rosary.

    Here’s a cool thing. The midwife didn’t check for dilation at this point, and I’m so grateful she did not. What’s the point of all these cervical exams that women are always given during pregnancy? They don’t tell you anything about when baby will come. I wasn’t having painful contractions, so the midwife said she didn’t expect to see dilation yet, and she’d just wait to check me later. Cool! Fine with me! I didn’t need that kind of stress in my life! I was so happy to be working with midwives this time instead of OBs. Nothing against the OBs who’d helped me with my other babies, but I will always recommend midwives over OBs to any low-risk pregnant mom. It’s a world of difference, a whole different philosophy. I only had to endure two cervical exams this entire pregnancy, both of them in active labor (more on that later).

    Well, they got me sorted out with the IV block, then moved me from triage to a delivery room. There, they hooked me up to a fetal monitor (this was, after all, a 2VBAC1), gave me my first dose of penicillin, and then let me be. Still no pain. I remembered the advice of the doula who’d helped me with my third birth: sometimes relaxing actually gets things moving along. So, I took a shower, got in my fuzzy bathrobe and sleep hat, grabbed my teddy bear, and laid down for a rest. The braxton-hicks5 were starting to feel a little bit more intense, but nothing serious or uncomfortable. I figured I’d rest while I still could. There was a long night ahead of me.

    It worked. I probably only rested for thirty, forty minutes or so, before the contractions picked up. This was around midnight. So I got up and started walking around, moving through them. I wanted to to make progress, and plus, in the early part of active labor, walking or rocking or swaying through the contractions seriously helps.

    But I could feel things were moving quickly. At one point my teeth started chattering uncontrollably, which meant the hormones were doing crazy things. Each contraction was a bit more intense than the last. I was feeling lots of nausea, so was pretty much just hanging out in the bathroom, at this point, and I started having to really focus to get through the pain. This was the point at which time becomes weird and you go into this strange primal otherworldly place, mentally. If you’ve ever been in labor you know what I mean.

    I will share some things that helped me cope with the pain, in case you’re a pregnant mom reading this and mentally preparing for your own labor like I was.

    I kept on praying. I brought out from my little toolbox the Anima Christi prayer, which I’d been dwelling on over the past few days. With each contraction I’d think about one of the first three lines:

    “Soul of Christ, sanctify me.

    Body of Christ, save me.

    Blood of Christ, embolden me.“

    It wasn’t even an intentional thing, where I set out to meditate on one of these lines. It just kind of happened. I’d be praying and as the pain picked up my brain would slow to a stop and just kind of linger over one of these lines while I thought about the Passion or remembered my last Holy Communion just four days prior.

    And – this bit sounds super uncharacteristic of me, because I’m a very negative and pessimistic person, lol – I guess the other thing that helped was staying positive about it. This was a mind game, I knew. I had to make myself like the pain. I had to be really intentional. Yes, I’d say to myself, yes, this is good. I’m coping with this so well. At one point, I could sense myself starting to get frustrated and mad at the pain, wanting to say to it, “fucking hell!, just leave me alone, stop doing this to my body!” Which created a sensation of fear. So I caught myself, and changed the narrative real quick, because that was the very path that led me to the epidural with my last baby: feeling like a victim of the pain, like the pain was something bad happening to me. This time, I intentionally took ownership of it. It wasn’t happening to me, as they say; it was me. And that actually helped. It’s seriously psychological warfare, in labor.

    (A few other little sensory tricks that really help, if you’re curious: movement, vocalization, and squeezing the shit out of wide-toothed wooden combs in each hand. Randomly, I also took a weird comfort in running my hands under the faucet in the bathroom sink.)

    Well, by now I was in the zone, and it was about two AM. The midwife came in to check me. She’d said she was going to wait to check me until it was time for the second dose of antibiotics, which wasn’t supposed to be for another hour; but I guess she could see that I had progressed pretty far, and she was probably afraid I’d have the baby on the bathroom floor, lol. I was pretty uncomfortable by now, so I was really hoping that she’d tell me I was at like a six, at least a five.

    Imagine my relief when she told me I was at a nine! Thank God! That far already? So I was coping with this pretty well, after all?! That gave me a fresh burst of motivation: it would be over soon. She stayed with me, and directed me into this-that-and-the-other position through the contractions (which, btw, an OB would not have done), and when she checked me again at about 2:30 (all of these time estimates are very approximate, because like I said I was in that zone where everything is spacey and time doesn’t really exist), I was at a ten.

    I’ll spare you the details of the next half-hour, not because anything went wrong, but just because this phase is particularly bodily. Suffice it to say that baby was born about thirty minutes later, just before 3 AM, with no interventions or pain meds of any kind.

    But then came the biggest surprise of all. We were team green, in this pregnancy, waiting to find out the baby’s gender until birth. I was completely certain, the entire nine months, that it was a girl. I called the baby “she” the whole time, thinking of her as my daughter and calling her by our chosen girl name. I barely ever even considered that it might be a boy; that felt so unlikely as to not even be a real possibility. My intuition had been correct for my other three kids, so I knew, I simply knew, that this was going to be a girl.

    But: he was a boy!

    A boy, born all natural, only six hours from the time my water broke, only three hours from the onset of actual discomfort. What the helly!

    Later that day, recovering in our room in the mother-baby ward, I was lying there watching EWTN on my TV. Daily Mass was on. It was the Novus Ordo Mass, which I generally avoid, but it was a solemn and reverent one – EWTN is great; Mother Angelica, ora pro nobis! – so I watched it anyway. If you’ve ever watched Mass on TV, you know that, when it comes time for Communion, they cut to an Act of Spiritual Communion for the viewers at home who can’t receive physically. On EWTN, they don’t always use the same prayer every single time; it changes day by day, as there are many prayers one can say for this intention.

    Guess which prayer they broadcast that day, my son’s birthday, for the Spiritual Communion?

    It felt like a small reassurance that Wednesday was the right day for him to be born, after all.

    .

    .

    Footnotes for those who might not be familiar with pregnancy terminology:

    1. VBAC: vaginal birth after cesarean. Whenever you give birth the normal way after a prior c-section, there’s a risk (extremely minute) of uterine rupture at the incision site, which is terrifying and life-threatening if it happens. So when you’re in labor after a prior C, they make you wear a fetal monitor the whole time to make sure baby is doing okay. It’s not too bad, because you can still walk around and even get in the water if you want to; you just have a device strapped around your belly. 2VBAC: second VBAC, still treated the same way during labor, even if you’ve already done it once successfully before.

    2. Group B strep is a bacteria that we sometimes carry and sometimes don’t. It comes and goes, and isn’t at all harmful to mom (or her husband; it’s not an STI); you can actually test positive for it one week and negative the next. But, if it gets passed to a baby during birth, it can sometimes cause them to get sick, and if that happens it’s deathly serious. So, if you test positive in late pregnancy, they just give you antibiotics during labor: two doses, four hours apart. Normally if your water breaks you don’t necessarily need to rush to the hospital unless you’re having 5-1-1 contractionsA , but, if you are GBS+, they tell you to come to the hospital immediately if your water breaks, because risk of infection goes up.

    A. that is, contractions five minutes apart, lasting one minute, for one straight hour.

    3. Pitocin is synthetic oxytocin, given through an IV, to induce labor or help it progress when contractions aren’t happening or aren’t strong enough.

    4. Cytotec is a different kind of medication, not an IV med, but a tablet that they actually insert into your body to soften the cervix to encourage labor. When I had Cytotec I was already 40 and a half weeks along and only needed one dose, so it barely even felt like an induction, honestly.

    5. Braxton-hicks contractions are these random, painless but weird contractions that most moms experience a few times a day in later pregnancy; they’re called “practice contractions,” because they’re how your uterus practices to get ready for labor. Your whole stomach gets really tight and sometimes you can feel a bit breathless, almost like you’re doing a crunch, but they don’t hurt.

  • Why do people celebrate summer?

    June 7th, 2025

    As I write this, it’s early June, and I just returned from a late morning, outdoor summer festival for kids at a local park, which I attended with my three children (five, three, and two). And the event left me wondering: why do people celebrate summer? And why do people think of this as a great time to get outside? When it comes to being comfortable in the outdoors, summer is the worst season by far.

    Granted: I live in the southeastern US, where summers are infamously hot (it was 85F before noon today) and brutally humid (“it’s not the heat that gets you, it’s the humidity!”). Also, as I write this, I am 35 weeks pregnant, which definitely doesn’t help with the whole heat tolerance thing.

    But in general: seriously: unless you live in a far northern area like Alaska or remote Canada or Scandinavia or Siberia, where the dead of summer probably peaks at about the temperature of an early spring morning here in the American South, I really don’t understand why summer got this reputation for being the time to get outdoors and have “fun in the sun.”

    Does anyone actually like being hot? Does anyone actually like being sweaty? Being sweaty is one of my least favorite sensations. It’s gross. And sweat stinks. It makes you stink. It makes your clothes all wet, ruins your hair and makeup. And dressing modestly in summer is a challenge. I make it work with lightweight maxi skirts and high-necked tees, but there are certainly times when I’m tempted to just wear some short shorts and a tank top.

    And does anyone actually like being in the bright sunlight? Squinting to see anything? Squinting gives you wrinkles on your face. And you have to use a bucket of sunscreen, which is greasy and smells and makes you look and smell like a dork. (Yes, btw, I am very white.) The sun ages you and gives you skin cancer. “Fun in the sun,” my rear end! I need a freaking parasol.

    And also, bugs. Are there people out there who aren’t bothered by the bugs? Where I live, there are abundant wasps (what is their purpose? I truly believe that they, along with student loan agencies, are the very minions of Satan), mosquitoes (which carry diseases), ticks (which also carry diseases), fruit flies (which don’t carry diseases but are annoying as heck and cloud in your face when you’re sweaty, getting in your eyes and mouth), and all kinds of nasty crawling things that try to hitch a ride on your body and sneak into your home and crawl on your bed at night. It’s disgusting. If you have a pet (which I don’t, but I used to be a dog groomer), this is also the time of year they’re most likely to get fleas. Which, why do those even exist? It’s just truly a vile time of year. It feels like we’re living in a freaking rainforest, or the Australian bush.

    If there’s any season that should be the “great outdoors,” “fun in the sun” time, it’s early spring, or perhaps late fall/early winter. Here in the South, the heat and bugs persist well into October nowadays, but November and December are usually pretty nice because the bugs have died by then. Early spring is nice, too, like late February/early March, before the bugs come back, and before the humidity, when temperatures tend to hover in the 60s F. I mean, these are the temperatures at which the human body is most comfortable. We are not reptiles; we do not thrive in 90-degree weather.

    I get it: some people love to swim. Or surf, or whatever. For those kinds of activities, in an outdoor pool or in the ocean, temps in the 80s and 90s are probably ideal. I don’t swim, myself, and I don’t like the ocean – it’s too dangerous, too scary – but I know some people like it. That’s fair. But I don’t think summer should be so glorified just because it’s conducive to a hobby of one portion of the population.

    And I guess the fact that school’s out is another reason why people love summer. That is nice. And yes, as a kid, of course I liked summer break. But it makes sense that we have a break in summer because that’s when it’s too freaking hot to leave the house at all. It’s too hot to get in the car. It’s too hot to walk around. It’s simply too hot for humans.

    I guess some people like to garden, and summer is garden season. So that’s cool. I’m glad some people enjoy gardening, because I sure don’t! I wonder if these people actually enjoy being out in the heat and bugs, or if they simply put up with it because they enjoy growing plants, and this is the time when plants grow.

    Maybe I should move to one of those far northern places I mentioned earlier. Move, or stop complaining, you’re probably thinking. And perhaps that’s fair! But, this is my stupid little blog, and I can complain here if I want to, lol. (And, anyway, I am a Southerner at heart; I will always love the South, and love to complain about it, and, despite everything, will probably always love it here more than anywhere else.) And besides: the point here is, I’m genuinely curious about why summer has come to be celebrated as the funnest of all seasons, why people think it’s the best time to be outdoors. “Yay, summer!” What? Why?? What are the pros? Here in my neck of the woods, this is the time to hide from nature, to stay the heck indoors.

  • Spring Baking Championship s. 11 Finale Part Two: Mith Reacts

    May 21st, 2025

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for season 11 of Spring Baking Championship.

    That’s a wrap for this season! What did we think of the finale? I’m eager to hear your thoughts. Here are mine:

    Well; one of my predictions ended up being right, but the other did not. It was hard to see Mary-Frances go, but Raveena’s bake-off cake did seem a bit more special. So that wasn’t so surprising. It would have been great to see Mary-Frances win. But, she certainly did seem to gain some needed self-confidence, during the show. Everyone always talks about how much they’ve “grown” during the competition, but Mary-Frances really became noticeably more lighthearted, cheerful, expressive, and bold as the season went on!

    So onto the final Main Heat. I feel conflicted about how this one went.

    The challenge was Marie Antoinette hairstyle cakes. Lisa’s and Raveena’s both looked very Marie Antoinette, with the towering cakes covered in piped whitish gray frosting decorated with bows and adornments. Priya’s did not look Marie Antoinette at all. It was cool, but no one is going to look at that and think of the Queen of France. It was all chocolate! I know Priya’s a chocolatier, and was playing to her strengths really well. I feel like she should have at least done white chocolate. Her topiary concept was cool, but it was very contemporary and dark. When I saw it, I really didn’t think the judges were going to be happy with her interpretation. But – they loved it? I guess the whole “Marie Antoinette” theme was just a suggestion?

    To be fair, though, it did sound like Priya’s tasted the best. Hers was the only cake that elicited genuinely amazed, delighted reactions. Raveena’s earl gray tea dried her cake out a bit, and her ganache was a bit too thick. And Lisa’s was, apparently, a little tough in texture and a little “too safe” in flavor. The judges disagreed about her fresh raspberries.

    I was actually kind of annoyed by their judgment of Lisa. They told her that her piping didn’t look like hair. Which was simply not true! It looked at least as hair-like as Raveena’s piping, which they complimented! And Priya’s didn’t look like hair at all – didn’t even try to – so, what the heck?

    But, I’m also glad it ended up being Priya. The fact that she started off as a hairstylist, then made the decision to switch up her career after that wildfire evacuation upended her life? It definitely made for good TV. Kardea is always the most sensitive and warm as a judge, which I love about her; hearing the little speech she gave Priya about destiny and all, was really touching.

    I guess I’m slightly bummed that my prediction ended up being wrong, lol. I would have loved to be right about Lisa. But, on the other hand, Lisa did mention in this episode that, when she was first dating her husband, they took a vacation to the Dominican Republic together (!!), which tells me that she probably does not have a pressing need for 25k in her life, hahaha, she’s got money, she’ll be fine.

    Honestly, I thought Raveena’s was the prettiest, and the most interesting, flavor-wise, so I kind of felt like she should have won. But, when I saw the judge’s reactions, I knew it was going to be Priya. The enjoyability of the cake as food is, after all, the most important thing, isn’t it? And Priya is, I believe, the oldest contestant (although she doesn’t look it; married twenty years? I was like, what, did you get married at ten?!), and a mom of three, and her family seems positively lovely. So, I’m genuinely happy for her. She was very humble about her victory – commenting the whole episode long on how beautiful her competitors’ cakes were, and, at the end, turning the focus back to them as she mentioned that she was “among the best” – and she did really deserve it. Congratulations, Priya!

    My high point: Raveena’s husband, during the “video clips from the family back home” section. The other two family videos were all emotional and tearful and sentimental, as they typically are, but Raveena’s husband was hilarious and so chill. They seem like such a cool couple.

    My low point: Not within the episode, but, after the episode: I looked up when Summer Baking Championship starts this year, and apparently it has not been renewed for this year?! What the actual F?!! You’re telling me I have to wait until winter (because I do not watch the Halloween championship)???! UGH! No summer baking 2025! I’m honestly crushed. I hope they don’t discontinue it permanently.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Obviously Priya’s chocolate-orange blossom cake. Chocolate orange is an unbeatable flavor combo! It sounded phenomenal. Duff complained that there was “a bit too much filling,” hello, that’s the best part! I’ll take it.

    .

  • In Case Of Fire

    May 20th, 2025
    Daily writing prompt
    What personal belongings do you hold most dear?
    View all responses

    Core memory time!: growing up, I was often told the tale of how, when my mother was pregnant with me, the family house caught fire in the night (an outdoor tiki lantern not properly extinguished, I think it was) and was completely destroyed. No one was hurt, but the house, and a lot of belongings inside of it, were lost forever.

    I thought about that story a lot, as a kid; my anxiety really latched onto it. The way I saw it, already, by the time I was born, I’d nearly died in a fire. Mortal danger was imminent. A ruinous house fire, I presumed, could truly strike at any time, any one of these nights, and I needed to be prepared. And thus, I have always, my whole life, kept a mental list of which objects I would grab on my way out in the event of a house fire.

    The items on the list have changed over the years (at one point, my copy of JTHM: The Director’s Cut was #1 on the list, lol), but two things on it have been the same for most of my life; and currently, these two items are really the only things I think I’d grab, realistically. If there were more time, I might try and save some of the sacred art and icons on the walls, the crucifixes, my children’s certificates of baptism, the handmade quilts my mother and MIL have gifted us, or some of my framed counted cross stitch projects, or maybe my laptop. But, probably, there wouldn’t be enough time, after ensuring that all of my kids were safe. Luckily, my top two must-save items are small and close at hand, kept in my bedroom at all times. And they are:

    1) My teddy bear. Yep, as a mom in my mid-thirties, I still sleep with my childhood teddy bear. My mother gave him to me when I was two or three years old – just a basic cream-colored teddy bear with black eyes and a brown nose and a serious little mouth; nothing fancy – and the moment that I received him and gave him his name is one of my earliest memories. Since then, he has slept in my bed every night, almost without fail (there was one particular trip for which I forgot to pack him, which made sleeping in that motel bed even more uncomfortable, and to this day I superstitiously believe that my forgetting the bear probably should have been a red flag that I should not have taken that ill-fated trip in the first place). I cannot sleep comfortably without him under my arm – nothing else will do – and if, in the night, he escapes and rolls out of the bed, I inevitably wake up and need to find him. This bear has been just about everywhere with me, and has, as they say, seen some shit. At times, my husband will look at him, sitting there on our bed with all his wear and tear and floppy limbs and patchy fur, and be like: “we should probably consider retiring that bear soon, putting him somewhere safe, to preserve him,” to which I always respond absolutely not, over my dead body. In the event of a house fire, this bear is escaping with me, no question.

    And:

    2) The USB drive that contains all of my writing. I’ve been storing all of my major writing projects on a flash drive since I was old enough to know what a flash drive was and how to use one. Even the projects that I wish I could get rid of. Some of the earlier ones are… ugh, you don’t want to know. I shudder to even think. I never look at them, never, and never ever plan to; it’s too embarrassing, even though no one but myself has ever laid eyes on any of this junk.

    Why can’t I get rid of them? The thought that, one day, after I die, my children or grandchildren will discover these files and look at them, makes me positively sick with dread. I cannot let that happen. I’ve seriously considered having the USB somehow implanted in my body so that it’s destroyed with me when I die, almost like Himself in Infinite Jest (although, that didn’t work out according to plan for him, did it).

    Why can’t I get rid of these stupid old files from like 2003-2006, which I wrote when I had no idea what anything was, and didn’t even realize that I didn’t know? (One of them is a “novel” of literally about 300k words, the longest thing I’ve ever written – all of it, just pure vomit!) They’re so mortifying to even think about! But, I can’t bring myself to delete it!

    Is anyone else like this, with their old creations??

    What’s weird is, I was pretty okay with destroying my old drawings. I used to keep sketch pads, during my teens and early twenties, in which I drew billions of little pictures that were just as cringe as some of my writing (if not more so); at some point, though, I threw all of these out, and it was not even that painful or difficult. But the writing! I can’t delete it! – Is it because I poured so much of my little heart and soul into the writing, whereas the doodles were just little snapshots, representing tiny fragments of what was contained in the writing in its horrible fullness? There was a time when I really loved to draw, but writing has always absorbed me and fulfilled me in a way that drawing does not. Writing was, for me, like the consummation of what drawing suggested.

    Looking back on my life, I can organize it into sections according to what I was writing at the time, because my writing life has always been just as vivid and real and important as my real life. I guess, to sound super cliché and drippy, throwing away these old artifacts would feel like throwing out pieces of myself. Which, perhaps I ought to be okay with. Those horrible stories are pieces of my self, of what makes me Mith. But, I shouldn’t love that! Why should I be so attached to my little individual self? “He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world, keepeth it unto life eternal.”

    Maybe one day, when I am closer to holiness, I will be free, and finally be able to purge this USB drive of all its cursed contents. But, until then, it stays with me, and will definitely be escaping with me in the event of a house fire.

  • Spring Baking Championship s. 11 Finale Part One: Mith Reacts

    May 14th, 2025

    SPOILERS AHEAD for season 11 of Spring Baking Championship!

    Was anyone else thrown for a loop? I was expecting the whole finale – but we only got the first half! I was not prepared for that cliffhanger after the sudden death bake-off.

    Obviously, I knew there’d be some kind of sudden death elimination after the first challenge, since they were going into the finale with four contestants instead of three. But still, I thought it’d be one big episode. Guess we have to wait another week!

    One thing I always love about these later episodes leading up to the finale: there are so few contestants that we really get to spend time with each one of them. As exciting as the early episodes are, they feel so rushed! Trying to cram twenty-four bakes into forty-three minutes is just way too fast! Now that there are only four, we really get to experience the baking along with each contestant. Really savor the flavors, if you will.

    There were only six bakes this whole episode! And Fraisier cakes was such a good decision, for this last Preheat. Such a classic, nothing too wild and wonky, but at the same time, so intricate and fussy and technical. I wish Paul had been here for it, though. He would have nailed this!

    And the contestants were asked to “make a statement” with their Fraisier cake. I thought Mary-Frances met that brief the best. She decided to make a strawberry-forward Fraisier cake, replacing the vanilla crème mousseline with a strawberry one, and then decorated it with green marzipan and buttercream in that very ornate, almost vintage style that she’s so good at. It was very her, and very much a “statement.”

    Priya’s idea for a Persian love cake inspired Fraisier was on point, and those sugar-coated strawberries on top were gorgeous! But, apparently Duff couldn’t taste the cardamom or rose, although Kardea tasted them loud and clear. Was it just me, or was Duff being super harsh this episode?! I guess he feels like he needs to be, in the finale!

    And the other two Fraisiers: Raveena’s unfortunately fell a bit flat and was overcooked (she had some struggles and had to re-bake her cakes, I felt so bad for her), and Lisa’s, while perfect and gorgeous as usual (well, Duff complained that the pastry cream was slightly overcooked), was not too much of a “statement” because it was basically a normal, classic Fraisier but with a cute dog on top. Loved that story, though! Lisa told us that she owned that dog from the time she was twenty up until she was thirty-six. Which made my jaw drop! Because I was like, wait, you’re telling me this girl is older than thirty-six?! She literally looks about twenty-two! (My husband, seeing the photo of the adorably gnarly-looking sixteen-year-old Yorkie, remarked that “the dog must be her Dorian Gray portrait,” lol.) Seriously, this whole time I’ve thought she was a lot younger than me. I kinda hope she gets famous so she can blow up on social media and drop her skincare routine. But, I digress.

    In the end, we saw Mary-Frances and Raveena going into the sudden death bake-off (I guess Mary-Frances’s crème was slightly too thick; bummer). “The One Dessert That Will Magically Fix Everything” was a great challenge. This was so intense, because, first of all, they only had sixty minutes (!), and second, it was such an emotional and personal theme, and three, they each chose to bake such a different dessert! It’s apples and oranges! How are you supposed to compare a warm Indian spice cake with a cool yuzu pavlova?! And they both got excellent feedback with only a couple of minor complaints.

    I had no idea whom the judges were going to choose. Mary-Frances’s meringue was slightly too soft, but Raveena’s pistachios should have been more finely chopped. Mary-France’s yuzu curd had a better texture, but Raveena’s orange-ginger curd had a better flavor. But they were both so good! From the feedback, it was impossible to tell whose was better. Going to bed last night after watching the show, I decided that they were probably going to send Raveena home, but this morning, having slept on it, I think it’s actually going to be the opposite. Raveena’s cake was, I think, more of a “baking championship” type dessert, and maybe a little more ambitious. Not that a pavlova isn’t ambitious — I’ve seen enough of these shows to know how hard it is to bake a meringue! But, the fresh fruit wasn’t glazed or anything… and Raveena’s was so extra, so heartfelt, with all the spices and those cardamom cheesecake dollops on top. I don’t know. This is just my guess. What do you guys think?!

    My high point: The camaraderie! Even though I wish Corey and Paul were still here, it was actually kind of really cool to have an all-women finale. They all seem genuinely friendly with and supportive of each other. Like, during the bake-off, everyone was talking with each other and just being so positive and kind. My favorite moment was when Lisa and Priya were watching Mary-Frances prepping her fresh fruit: “She’s peeling a kiwi – with a spoon! She didn’t even break the skin. She’s a monster!”

    My low point: Duff’s harsh judging! Not one single dessert made it past him without some little complaint! I was like, come on, lol. But, at the same time, I get it, and I’d definitely rather watch strict judging than judging that’s too lax and gentle. He’s still such a likeable judge.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Mary-Frances’s strawberry and marzipan Fraisier. I wouldn’t even mind that that crème was “too thick,” it sounded delicious.

    My official prediction for the finale: 4) Mary-Frances; 3) Priya; 2) Raveena; 1) Lisa.

    .

  • Is it ok to enjoy love stories?

    May 13th, 2025

    This post is related to my post on music, and also inspired in part by an article I read a couple months ago in Benedictus – actually, it was an excerpt from an old book called “The Ecclesiastical Year,” and it was about the Feast of the Annunciation, a.k.a. Lady Day. If you read Benedictus you might remember the piece I’m talking about.

    “Love reciprocally for and from a mother is one of the safest kinds: it contrasts with the dangers of love for a lady sought in marriage passionately, the perils of which are well illustrated by those romantic stories which so pleased readers in the days of chivalry, and in which St. Francis of Assisi, St. Ignatius of Loyola, and St. Theresa found some delight which they afterward repudiated.” Basically, the point of this little excerpt seems to be that the love for and of Our Lady is purer and more perfect than any fleshly love; superior, obviously, to the sort of love told about in love stories. Thus her “knights” on earth are better examples of real chivalry than any of those fictional characters which we enjoy so much.

    The author doesn’t completely disparage the whole genre of chivalry/romance, though. “[T]he well-instructed Catholic does not need to be told that he must not starve out all love for family in kindred in his zeal for loving Jesus and Mary.” It’s only the misinformed and ignorant, Fr. Rickaby asserts, who react dramatically and violently to the Church’s advice to be cautious regarding fleshly affections: basically, getting all up in arms, claiming that the Church ‘hates love’ or some such, and veering hard to the opposite extreme: idealizing passionate love, claiming that it’s the greatest thing on earth, “an inspiration to high deeds and noble living, as well as a source of ennobling power.”

    Which, this seems to be still extremely true of society today, don’t you think? Those who hate Catholicism love to accuse us of hating love – as if we’re all stuffy and prudish and afraid of pleasure. Which is very false. And it’s definitely true that our culture idealizes romance. I’ve talked in other posts about how weird and unfortunate it is that, as a society, we’re so obsessed with romantic love – it seems like every song on the radio, every popular TV show and movie, glorifies romance as if it’s the one thing to be desired above all else. Which attitude is, I think, pretty unhealthy for young folks to absorb.

    I don’t want to be one of the ignorant and misinformed people that Fr. Rickaby is talking about in this excerpt. Obviously, I’m aware that there’s nothing wrong with enjoying a romantic story, as long as that romantic story is healthy, orderly, clean, and appropriately contextualized: always secondary to, and always leading towards, love of God.

    But, I guess my question is: is it ever okay to enjoy a secular love story per se? It’s similar to my question about enjoying pop music. Basically, the question underlying both of these seems to be: is it ever okay to deliberately arouse the passions/excite the emotions over something secular?

    Of course it’s true that we can safely enjoy some secular things, as long as we don’t get carried away. But what does it mean to get “carried away?” How do we know if we’re getting carried away? And, does reading/watching romance stories, or listening to love songs, fall under the category of safe secular things that we can enjoy in moderation? Or is it always an occasion of sin?

    Getting carried away: I imagine “getting carried away” would mean that you’re enjoying a thing so much that you neglect your religious duties, or find yourself tempted to sin. So is it only bad to arouse the passions if it leads you to sin or temptation?

    Or, is arousing the passions always bad all the time, simply because you’re getting yourself into a state in which your emotions have taken over and the will/intellect is no longer in charge?

    – But then: just because you are arousing the passions for a while, does that always mean that the intellect has been subordinated? Isn’t it possible to enjoy a bit of (clean) titillation for a little while, as long as you are able to put it down and walk away and go about your business when the time for it is done? If you’re addicted to pleasure, that’s a problem, obviously. But if you’re able to decide when and how much to indulge, and stop when you’re done… is that still a problem, I wonder?

    And obviously, I’m not talking about pleasure/stimulation that’s sinful. I think (emphasis think, don’t know for sure) that it’s possible to enjoy a love story without lust getting involved.

    Let’s take an example. One of my favorite guilty pleasure shows: Outer Banks. (CAUTION: SEASON 3 SPOILERS AHEAD, stop reading here if you haven’t yet watched season three.) Take the scene where JJ rescues Kiara from that detention camp place her parents stuck her in. It’s so romantic. Completely non-sexual, but, still tugs on the heartstrings and makes you feel all mushy inside (at least, if you’re a dork like me, I guess). Similarly, let’s consider another embarrassing guilty pleasure of mine: the song “As Long As You Love Me” by Justin Bieber ft. Big Sean. It’s a totally clean song, nothing sexual in it, not even any innuendos or allusions. And (for me, at least) it gives you the feels in your heart, but is not what I’d call erotic or sexual or anything like that. (I know some would say that the rhythms alone make this song base and sexual, even though the lyrics are pretty innocent.) Works like these ones light up pleasure centers in the heart/chest region, but not so much the loins. So: are this scene and this song safe territory? Or is such romance always lustful because of what it leads to/evokes/suggests? Is it okay to enjoy things like these, in moderation?

    I really don’t know, which is why I am writing this post. I’m not trying to make excuses for myself. In the past, back when I had MiTHology 2.0, I used to write all of these awful posts attempting to dissect the teachings of the Catholic Church that bothered me, and to “disprove” them — to prove, for example, why things like non-traditional marriage and female priests should actually be okay. Lol. I am no longer doing that, here. I hope I’m not that arrogant anymore. My priest told me that listening to impure pop/hip-hop music is a sin, so, that’s that; I accept that as the truth. I’m just thinking out loud here, and wrestling with a teaching that I find difficult, and looking for outside opinions if anyone is actually reading this and has an opinion that they care to share. Probably I should work up the nerve to ask an actual priest about all of this, but I have AvPD, and asking people for things is really hard.

    No longer making excuses; trying not to, anyway. But it’s awfully tempting. Because sometimes, sinful things look awfully pretty and well-done, like fine art. There are some rap music videos that a part of me thinks are absolute works of art, and certain performers in that genre are undeniably talented at what they do, like, their skills are impressive to listen to! It’s really amazing to me what Nicki Minaj can do with her voice. I’m like, surely it must be okay to just appreciate the talent at work, here? – But, on that note, you could, in theory, have “really well done” porn featuring talented actors and beautiful scenery, I guess, and it would still be porn and therefore despicable. There do exist, I guess, really skilled and agile pole dancers, but pole dancing is still a sinful thing to perform in public. A beautifully-designed dress can be a fine work of art and still really immodest. So, just because something is well done, doesn’t give me an excuse to enjoy it.

    Something like porn is obviously always bad. But that’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m just wondering how okay it is to enjoy a nice clean love story – specifically, one that’s not necessarily Catholic. I’m aware that there are good Catholic works of literature out there that deal with the sacrament of marriage and with healthy Catholic relationships. Those are surely fine and good to enjoy in moderation. But, something like Outer Banks, while not smutty or graphic like some other shows, is decidedly not Catholic. Pop songs like the Justin Bieber one have nothing to do with God – but are they necessarily evil?

    Like I was saying about these two examples: they are certainly sensual, in a way, in that they are pleasing to the senses; but the pleasure centers that they light up are more emotional than sexual. Does that make them better, safer?

    Obviously, not all fleshly love is bad. The love that an atheist mom has for her children is still a wonderful and powerful thing. The love between two friends, regardless of whether they are Christian or not, is a good and beautiful thing. The sentiment of love is good and beautiful. As Fr. Rickaby said in this excerpt, it’s not like all Catholics are required to give up their love for their earthly family! That would be ridiculous! Even romance is good and healthy and all, if it’s engaged in without sin.

    But enjoying romantic stories? Or even just emotional stories/songs at all, in which the whole gist of the story is a relationship between mortal characters? As someone who loves these, I guess I’m just wondering whether it is ethically permissible to love these.

    What do we think, fellow Catholics? Is it safe to cherish ~feelings~ about non-religious things? Is it okay to enjoy a clean romance novel here and there? Are non-sexual romantic pop songs okay? Is it ever okay to intentionally arouse the passions about something secular?

  • Am I a bad mom if my two-year-old is still in diapers?

    May 10th, 2025

    (Please note that, in this post, I am not talking about special needs or neurodivergent children. I’m aware that they are in a different situation entirely.)

    A few years ago, on Writer Twitter, I met a fellow aspiring author, a really cool lady, and we agreed to try being critique partners, and traded the first few chapters of our novels for each other to mark up (which was an absolutely sickeningly terrifying experience, for me, but I was really trying, at that point, to become a Serious Writer, lol). She was a generation or two my senior, but we wrote in the same genre, and I liked and trusted her. She left me a lot of thoughtful feedback — but the comment that jumped out to me the most was on a part where I mentioned a two-year-old child that was wearing a diaper to bed. My critique partner wrote in red: “A two-year-old in diapers?? Really??!”

    At the time, I had a two-year-old and an almost-one-year-old, both still decidedly in diapers. So, I just laughed in confusion, reading that. I figured my critique partner must not have much experience with kids. I seriously had no idea, at that point, that anyone on earth could consider it at all weird for a two-year-old to be wearing diapers!

    But then, some time later, I read somewhere that it’s only in recent decades, since the advent of disposable diapers, that parents have delayed potty training until age two/three. According to this source I read, back in the ‘50s and earlier, kids would be potty training around their first birthday – pretty much as soon as they could walk. So, some parents look down on us modern moms, for whom disposable diapers make it easier to be “lazy.”

    A confession: I’m a mom of three, soon to be four, and I do not do cloth diapers. Womp womp. I know that that would be the morally superior, crunchy thing to do. And I did do some research about it and seriously considered it – but honestly, I’m overwhelmed with laundry as it is, and just don’t want to.

    I’ve potty trained two girls so far, and am working on it with my son, who’s currently two. I’ve found, thus far, that each kid is extremely different. My eldest was unconventional: she was pooping in the potty every single time by the time she was two years old, but despite all my efforts, refused to pee in the potty until after she was three (and we had a real battle about it). But once it clicked, she never looked back, and has had almost zero accidents since. My second was a bit more normal about it. She was agreeable and a good learner, and fully trained by around two-and-a-half, well before three years old — but is more prone to accidents, even now, at almost four. My third (my only boy) currently hates the potty, doesn’t want anything to do with it, and at this point I’m resorting to rewarding him just for sitting on the thing at all. And my methods and process have been pretty much the same with each of them. I’m not super rigid about it; I start introducing the potty before they’re two, but the training process is more gradual than rigorous. It’s just what works for us.

    Is this a moral failing? Do I deserve the harsh judgment of these old-school, early-potty-training moms online? I don’t know.

    Maybe if I did cloth diapers, it would compel me to potty train my kids earlier. I know a mom from church who cloth diapers, and is currently potty training her fourteen-month-old because she simply can’t stand the laundry anymore – which, I imagine I’d feel the same way! But I also can’t help feeling like maybe she is the superior mom and human for this.

    My family’s pediatrician (who is a “normal” pediatrician, not a crunchy/holistic one) doesn’t start talking about potty training until two years old. When I told her my son was still pretty averse to the potty, at his two-year well check, she was totally unconcerned, and said that was still normal, that it was still early. So I guess this is the norm, in 2025. But just because something is the norm in modern times, certainly doesn’t mean it’s the best! If anything, maybe we should be wary of what’s considered normal in these modern times!

    So why don’t I just train my kids earlier, if I’m that concerned about it?: well, basically, because it’s easier.

    For one, less cleanup. I hate cleaning up pee. The earlier you train, the more accidents you have. Training my eldest when she was three years old was a pain in its own way, but there were relatively few pee spills to mop up.

    For two, it’s easier to instruct a slightly older child. With my two-to-three year old, I was able to have a slightly more rational conversation with her about the potty; and, although we butted heads, I found this approach far more intuitive than trying to teach a one-year-old about it. Maybe this is just because of my personality type. Being ILI in socionics/INTJ in MBTI/LVEF in psychosophy, I have a “logical” way of thinking, and so it makes the most sense for me to solve problems and approach obstacles that way.

    So yeah. It’s easier, for me, to potty train at a slightly older age, around two and a half. Parenting is hard, as we all know. I do try to make it easier where I can. Don’t we all?

    I do worry that I’m a bad or lazy mom or human for trying to make my life easier this way. Am I doing my kids a disservice somehow? Would they be more confident, and get off to a more self-assured start in life, if I had them out of diapers by age two? I don’t know. Some might say yes. But on the other hand, I worry that the struggle of going through potty training at a very early age might disrupt the peace in our house and end up affecting them negatively. Keeping stress low and moods positive as much as possible is not a luxury, but a necessity, I’ve found, when parenting.

    There’s also the argument that all those disposable diapers are wasteful and terrible for the environment. Although, the older I get, the less certain I am that the environment is as big of a concern as we’re made to believe it is (I don’t know, though; I’m on the fence, still) – and if it is, I know for absolute certain that there’s nothing a little person like me can do about it, that no matter how many reusable grocery bags and cloth diapers I use, no matter how much I inconvenience myself, it won’t matter a whit as long as all these big corporations, the air travel industry and meat production industry – the ones who actually have it in their power to change things – continue to not change. So, I’m honestly not super swayed by the whole “waste” argument.

    And I haven’t read up a lot on the psychology of potty training earlier vs. later, but, I’m not aware of any compelling evidence that a child is happier or healthier if they potty train earlier. Am I wrong?

    I guess in the ’50s and earlier, they were just more used to doing more cleanup. Nowadays, we don’t have to worry that much about that. Certain things are just easier now, because of advancements like disposable diapers. We also have things like washers, dryers, refrigerators, microwaves, all of which make life easier now than it used to be. Is it a moral failing to utilize such things? I can’t imagine that it is.

    Like I said, I’m just trying to make our lives easier, because when life is going smoothly, I’m a more patient, happier, and successful mom. Maybe if I were a tougher and stronger type of individual, I’d do cloth diapers instead of disposables. Maybe if I were more resilient and patient in general, I’d potty train at one instead of two.

    Maybe these are moral failings. I like to think it’s more like they are imperfections, or even maybe just morally neutral characteristics, of mine that I’m aware of and doing my best to work with, to make sure my family is as happy and mentally healthy as possible. Being flexible and low-stress about the potty is what’s been working for us.

    But if you have a really strong argument against potty training at two-three, or in favor of doing it earlier, my inbox is open.

  • Are homesteaders morally superior to the rest of us?

    May 8th, 2025

    ETA: this is part one of two. For the follow-up, in which I more or less find the answer to this question, please see part two.

    .

    There’s a big movement these days, especially among Catholics, to get away from the city/suburbs, buy some land in the countryside, buy some animals, plant some seeds, and become self-sufficient. I get it. Self-sufficiency is cool. In the event of a societal collapse, you’ll be prepared. You’re safe from all the weird toxic ingredients and contamination incidents that affect grocery store products. Additionally, living off the land is a very spiritual thing. You’re living in accord with the rhythms of nature; the seasons, the weather, sunrise and sunset. You’re connected to your food source in a way that grocery shoppers are not. City life is comparatively removed from God’s creation; God designed us to live off the land, didn’t He? For homesteaders, life is probably, in a lot of ways, more “real.”

    But does that make them better than the rest of us, who live in the city and buy all our food at the grocery store?

    I think in some cases, maybe?

    Let’s consider two individuals, we’ll call them Fran and Marge:

    Fran is a devout Catholic and a faithful wife. She tithes on her whole income, never misses Mass on Sundays or holy days, says her rosary daily, goes to confession weekly, and reads the lives of the saints. Fran and her family live in a nice suburban housing development with HOA fees. They don’t have room for animals or a garden (except a few potted flowers and ornamental shrubs), plus Fran doesn’t like getting her hands dirty. She’s an elegant lady. So they do all their shopping at their local grocery store, or sometimes the farmer’s market if it’s convenient, which it’s not, because Fran has ten kids, whom she homeschools, and also volunteers for Meals on Wheels and the local free pregnancy center, and in her free time enjoys committee work and Well Read Mom book club meetings with her church friends. She also works out daily at the local YMCA, where she takes aerobics classes.

    Next let’s look at Marge. Marge is a devout Catholic and a faithful wife. She tithes on her whole income, never misses Mass on Sundays or holy days, says her rosary daily, goes to confession weekly, and reads the lives of the saints. Marge and her family live on fifty acres, off a dirt road an hour outside of town. They have chickens, a dairy cow, a couple of goats, and a pig that they’re planning on slaughtering a few months from now to stock up their freezer. Marge makes her own yogurt and cheese from their own cow’s milk. They also have a huge garden, and Marge makes everything from scratch, canning and preserving all her own produce. It’s a full time job, between that and homeschooling her ten kids, but for Marge it’s very spiritually fulfilling. She doesn’t have time for volunteering outside the home, but for Marge, her home is her ministry.

    Who is the “better” Catholic? If all other factors are the same, and they’re both very prayerful and striving to remain always in the state of grace, then is Marge better because she homesteads? But what about all of Fran’s hard work? I don’t know if we can say that Marge is doing better – can we? As a wife and mother, shouldn’t her home be her foremost ministry, before any committees or volunteer work?

    Let’s consider a third individual though. We’ll call her Lois. Lois is a devout Catholic and a faithful wife. She tithes on her whole income, never misses Mass on Sundays or holy days, says her rosary daily, goes to confession weekly, and reads the lives of the saints. But in her free time, Lois is kind of a nerd. She enjoys watching TV and movies (but avoids anything racy or sinful), playing computer games (only clean ones), reading novels, writing stories, drawing, and knitting or crocheting. Committee work is not for her. She is an introvert and enjoys sitting quietly and looking out the window. She errs on the lazy side, but is doing her best; she’s a little chubby, but not obese or anything. Her suburban home has a decent-sized yard, but Lois has no interest in gardening or livestock. It’s just not how she cares to spend her time. For her, serving God means doing her very best at keeping her little house and homeschooling her ten kids, creating beautiful things, and just trying to be a good Christian witness to everyone whom she meets along her way as she goes about her little life. Including at the grocery store where she shops.

    Is Marge a better Catholic than Lois? What about Fran, where does she fall in there? Is Marge the most Catholicest of all of them? How would we “rank” these three?

    I guess we can’t really rank them. Only God can do that. But we can at least make an educated guess as to what kind of lifestyle we think is the holiest, can’t we?

    But then, who are we to know how God speaks to Lois, or to Fran, or to Marge? God built each of these women and knows their interior life and workings and struggles in ways that no human ever can. Only He can really judge them.

    But we still have moral compasses to steer us towards the best ways to live. What do we think? Should Lois and Fran abandon all their other works and hobbies, sell their homes, and buy some land and some livestock? Should Fran make herself miserable by getting her pretty fingernails dirty even though she hates it? Should Lois give up her crochet and computer games and instead raise chickens?

    If I had to guess, I’d say there’s no moral obligation for them to do that. I think homesteading is one of those things, like exercise, or reading old books, that’s very good for you indeed, but not a crime not to do.

    Or is it? I’m genuinely not sure.

    I know one thing for sure: not all of us have the luxury of being able to move out to the country. Land and livestock are expensive. There’s a stereotype that farming is such a humble and simple way to live; but it takes a lot of money to be able to live that humbly and simply! Maybe back in the day, farmers were poor folks, but these days, it’s kind of the opposite: poor folks live in cities and surrounding areas, now, and rich folks are the ones privileged enough to live off their own land. And yeah, sure, I bet it does save money, living that way, long-term (canning your own goods, slaughtering your own meat, harvesting your own produce…), but, in order to save that money, you have to have a lot of money upfront to buy the animals, the supplies, and the property! Someone living paycheck to paycheck simply cannot do that.

    But, a morally perfect person would make good financial decisions, wouldn’t they? A morally perfect person probably wouldn’t become poor enough to need to live paycheck-to-paycheck, because they would work hard, be careful to avoid unpayable debt, and their upstanding moral qualities would pay off in their lives, and surely anyone who’s not a complete screw-up, morally (because financial management is a moral matter) can afford a half acre or so, somewhere, can’t they? (I’m not talking about situations where people become poor through no fault of their own, such as medical debt from an illness or injury. Clearly such a person is not at fault for not being able to afford their own farm.)

    But those of us who could have done better in the past, and are now dealing with the after-effects of our previous less-than-perfect financial decisions (as a millennial, I’m thinking specifically about student debt); is our inability to homestead a moral failing? Is our grocery shopping a symptom of our sinfulness? Should we be ashamed of it?

    What about those of us who could, in theory, start a little garden or farm, but just don’t want to? What if, like Fran, we just hate getting sweaty and getting our hands dirty, and don’t particularly like farm animals? Or, like Lois, we’d rather do other hobbies? Should we just forget about our personal preferences/desires for comfort and pleasure, and get out there and do it anyway? – Is this what a very holy person, someone completely detached from all desires for comfort and pleasure, would do? I’m not such a person, so I honestly do not know.

    I feel like Marge and Fran are “better” Catholics than Lois. But that’s just a feeling, and I’m not sure if it’s in any way correct. Personally, I have the most in common with Lois, except I’m not as content or confident as she is; I’m always wondering, fretfully, if I should be more of a Marge, or at least a Fran. Although I’ve tried being more Fran-like in the past, and I suck at it. My attempts to be more Marge-like never stick, either. I just can’t wait to get inside and take a damn shower. Should I just accept that I’m a Lois, or should I push back against my natural inclinations and try to be more like Marge, or even Fran?

    So, I don’t really have a way to conclude this little post, because I honestly do not know. All I know for sure is, when I’m talking to folks from my parish who tell me they homestead and make their own everything, I feel like a shitty Catholic compared to them.

    Is it okay to be different? Is it okay to live in the city, or to want to? At this point, I can’t help feeling like Marge is the “best” and most Catholicest Catholic, followed by Fran, and then Lois; but that might just be my emotional perception, influenced by my poor self-image. I feel like perhaps if Lois and Fran become more spiritually advanced, they will develop a true desire to homestead, because it will seem more in keeping with the way God designed humans to live, and they will begin to love God’s will above all other things – right?

    Or, maybe that’s now how it happens. Maybe you can be a saint and live happily in the city and shop for groceries. I truly don’t know, at this point. I’d love to hear some other people’s opinions on this.

  • People Should Drive The Speed Limit

    May 8th, 2025

    Here is an unpopular opinion that a lot of people are going to hate me for: people should drive the speed limit.

    First of all for the pretty obvious reason that it’s the law, and we shouldn’t break the law.

    But also: when I was learning to drive, one of my best instructors was my older sister; and one of the best pieces of advice that she gave me was: “So many accidents could be avoided if people would just slow the f*** down.”

    And it’s absolutely true. So I really try to live by that. Sure, like most people, I’ve gotten a couple of speeding tickets in my day. I tend to drive faster if I’m comfortably familiar with the location, have a lot on my mind, and/or am listening to music, all of which sometimes make me forget that I’m driving a car. But the vast majority of the time, I’m that driver that you hate to get stuck behind because I drive the freaking speed limit; five over or under, depending.

    I mean come on. Why are you in such a hurry? Didn’t you leave on time? Maybe you should try waking up on time and leaving your house in a timely manner. Or what else is it? Is it just that you’re so important and cool that you just gotta drive fast because that’s what cool important people do?

    One of my biggest pet peeves is tailgaters. If I’m driving the speed limit, or even five or ten over, for goodness’ sake, and you are tailgating me – or even if I’m driving under the speed limit, for that matter: I have two questions for you.

    One: what are you trying to accomplish? Do you think that, by sitting there half an inch from my rear bumper, you are going to make me go faster? When has that ever worked for you? Tell me, has there ever been a time when you thought “gee, I wish this person in front of me would drive faster, maybe if I ride their butt they’ll get the message and speed up,” and they proceeded to actually speed up enough to appease you? Does that really work?

    And two: did you pause to consider that, when you are half an inch from my rear bumper, you have no reaction time whatsoever if I should brake? At such a short distance, even me lightly and gradually pressing the brakes is going to put us both in a dangerous situation, because frankly you can’t even see my tail lights you’re so close.

    Reaction time is something that I stress about a lot, in a car. In driver’s ed it was taught that there should always be at least one car length between you and the car in front of you, and that’s another thing that I live by. When passing, I always wait until the entirety of the vehicle that I’m passing is visible in my rearview – that I can see its tires touching the road – before I move back into the right lane. People sliding back and forth between cars with inches to spare, always give me a heart attack. What are you doing? Do you think this is freaking Tokyo Drift? Calm down.

    “Calm down” – I suppose you’re probably thinking that I should take that advice myself. And yes, it’s true that I have some driving anxiety. In my driving test in high school, I got dinged for waiting too long to turn left out of a parking lot, because I got nervous every time I saw a car coming. That was literally half my life ago, and I still do this. Sometimes I will turn right and add twenty minutes to my drive to avoid turning left! (I’m like Zoolander, allergic to left turns.) And yes, I hate merging, and yes, I drive the speed limit. I am nervous.

    But why the heck would anyone in their right mind not be nervous about driving? The average car weighs, according to Google, about 4100 pounds. And on average there are 114 fatal car crashes in the US daily. It’s a terrifying means of travel. I hate cars. Can more people start to take seriously how dangerous driving is, and how just a mere blink of a moment of inattention or the slightest lapse in judgment can kill people?

    Especially if you’re going too fast!!!

    This has annoyed me more, and made me angrier, ever since becoming a parent. I now drive with three little kids in the car. And when you are speeding around me, or tailgating, or pretending it’s Tokyo Drift like you’re some important hotshot, you are putting my kids in danger. The Christian charity to which I am obligated admittedly runs out, at this point. I have no patience with you.

    So many accidents could be avoided if people would just slow the f*** down. Don’t even get me started on screen use in cars. I can’t tell you how many dinkuses I see driving around with their smartphones in front of their faces. It’s enough to make me seriously consider moving to a city like NYC or some European metropolis where there are trains and subways and I’ll never have to drive again, or worry about teaching my children to drive. Cars are an abomination; even more so when you put self-important, arrogant idiots behind their wheels.

    In conclusion: slow the f*** down. Stop riding my bumper. You think I’m annoying by driving the speed limit? Cry about it. At least I’m not putting lives at stake.

  • Spring Baking Championship s. 11 Semifinal: Mith Reacts

    May 7th, 2025

    Caution: SPOILERS ahead for this episode of SBC!

    Damn. This was a thrilling episode to watch, overall, but my feelings about it are so clouded by my disappointment at who went home, that I’m having a hard time finding something nice to say. So let’s just get right to it:

    What happened! In the Preheat, my husband and I were excitedly talking about how talented Corey is and how, if not Lisa, he was sure to be the winner. His artistry and the way he thought about flavor combinations were quite unlike anyone else remaining in the competition. I love hearing, too, about how he made his own way in this field, making his childhood dream a reality through hard work and perseverance, and how he hopes to inspire other little boys like himself – he’s just such a cool guy! He really deserved the win.

    I really got the impression that Corey was pissed AF when he walked off! Normally, the eliminated contestant will give a tearful little smile and “thank you” speech and/or hug all his fellow contestants, but Corey just kind of abruptly walked off! And the clip that they played of him afterwards, talking about how proud he was of what he’d accomplished thus far? That definitely seemed like it was filmed before his elimination, based on the way he said “I don’t want to go home.” Which makes me think he perhaps stormed off the set without giving an actual exit interview? So the creators had to splice in something from earlier? Could it be, or am I imagining it? I wouldn’t blame him, for being so disappointed, if this is the case.

    But, I mean, to be fair: that cake did look rock-hard, unfortunately. And Duff said it wasn’t even cold, it was room temperature. It had become not a cake, but a “biscuit.” Yeah, Raveena’s had issues, too, like disappearing filling, but Corey’s had those same issues plus the rock hard biscuit cake. Devastating! As I keep saying, even the best of them have slip-ups, and I guess this one happened at a really inopportune moment. He was really a star of this season.

    Corey won the Preheat. His floating meringue island (mandarin orange, coconut crème anglaise, vanilla pavlova, strawberry and kiwi!) was a masterpiece, it blew all the others out of the water! But, there was no advantage in the Preheat this episode. My husband raised the question: what does the Preheat even really matter, in this situation? It makes the show more fun to watch, sure, but someone could literally fail the Preheat miserably and then go on to win the Main Heat and become the winner. What do you all think? Is the Preheat just for show? I feel like maybe it ought to have more “stakes” attached to it…

    And speaking of the Preheat: I knew Lisa was going to overcook that meringue. Whenever they show an interview clip of a contestant explaining their choices (“I really didn’t want to undercook the meringue and serve the judges raw eggs,” Lisa said), you just know that choice is going to come back and bite them in the butt. What a bummer!

    But so let’s try to talk about some nice things that happened this episode.

    Mary-Frances! She killed it in the Main Heat. Seriously, it’s like something happened to her about halfway through the show and she just came out of the woodwork and started winning. Talk about a dark horse. And now she’s in the final! Her cake bombe was gorgeous, truly one of the most beautiful desserts I’ve seen, with those white roses (tinged with glow-in-the-dark neon along the edges) sitting atop the white chocolate mirror glaze. I wouldn’t be too surprised if she ended up winning next week, at this point.

    Lisa and Raveena also brought it back, in the Main Heat. It looked like they were both in bad shape, for a minute there, with the melting ice creams! But Lisa found a creative solution, installing that border for her filling, and I’m not sure what Raveena did but her finished cake bombe looked stunning, with that elegant bright orange décor.

    And one other nice thing: thank God there was no stupid flavor “twist” in this Main Heat. There was enough going on with that challenge already, holy cow! A flambéed cocktail cake bombe with ice cream filling, that also glows in the dark, in two hours?! These challenges really are getting wild. I’m almost nervous to see what they’re going to have to do next week.

    My high point: Lisa’s creative solution in the Main Heat! Crisis averted! I was worried, for a minute there, that she was going home, but her bananas foster cake bombe ended up being basically flawless.

    My low point: Obviously, Corey leaving. What a classy guy. The way he hugged Raveena when she was so overwhelmed after the Main Heat bake… he deserves the world.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: It would have been Priya’s cherries jubilee cake bombe, but, I don’t do anything with liquor in it, so all the Main Heat desserts were a hard no from me. So, definitely Raveena’s white chocolate guava île flottante with coconut-macadamia streusel! Sounded dreamy! Duff complained that there was “not enough guava,” that the white chocolate overpowered, and that it was basically a “bowl of ganache.” Hell yeah, sounds perfect! I’ll take it!

    My official prediction for the final: 4: Priya, 3: Mary-Frances, 2: Raveena, 1: Lisa.

    .

  • The Most ~Inspiring~ Fruits

    May 6th, 2025
    Daily writing prompt
    List your top 5 favorite fruits.
    View all responses

    Seriously, what a silly prompt! Right? Does anyone actually care what anyone’s five favorite fruits are? Like, how is that supposed to make you want to read my blog (which is, after all, the purpose of this whole “daily prompts” thing, isn’t it?)? I would bet a substantial amount of money that no one, not one single soul out there in the world, will see a link to “Mith’s Top 5 Favorite Fruits” and go “oh wow, hot damn! I gotta know immediately! What are Mith’s top five favorite fruits?! I don’t even know who Mith is, but what fruit does she like?!” Literally, unless it’s someone you’re madly in love with, or your own child, or maybe your BFF or your mom or something, I cannot imagine anyone really caring about what some someone’s top five favorite fruits are.

    “So what.” That is one of the big ideas that got drilled into my head, back when I was a Writing major in college. “So what? Why are you telling me this?” is always in the back of my mind when I’m writing anything, or saying anything, to anyone. Which, combined with my AvPD, makes communicating with a person pretty stressful. When speaking, I often find myself trying to abbreviate my thoughts and phrases to get to the point already. Make it relevant. No one cares about my personal thoughts and feelings! “If you want to just write about your little thoughts and feelings, get a diary and tuck it under your pillow,” my favorite writing professor said, condescendingly.

    So, I keep most things to myself; sometimes to a fault.

    But, hell! Right? This is my personal blog! I can post what I want! No one reads it anyway! I may as well! – but still; I cannot stand to just post “here’s my favorite xyz” without trying to make it meaningful or significant in some way, or like something that I think/hope might potentially be mildly interesting to someone who doesn’t know me. So, instead of just “the top five yummy fruits that I like to eat” (because that’s so third grade), I’m going to list the “top five most meaningful and inspiring fruits for me as a wannabe writer.” Which is still pretty silly and personal and probably no one gives a single iota of shit, but hey!, at least it makes for a slightly more in-depth and engaging discussion than just “mm I liek banana cuz it taste good.”

    And I know a lot of us on here on wordpress are writers or wannabe writers, so maybe this little concept will resonate with some of you. Does anyone else find inspiration in little things, like fruit, sometimes, or is it just me? If anyone cares to join me in this game, let me know!

    ETA: One fruit has been removed from this list for personal reasons.

    So without further ado:

    5. Peach. Obvious generic choice, for someone from the American South: but, it gets more personal. In my childhood hometown, which btw is a very scenic and beautiful place (and which has, unfortunately, in the last couple of decades, become very self-aware about what a scenic and beautiful little small town it is, and is becoming increasingly bougie, overpopulated, and overdeveloped, thereby sacrificing its authenticity, but that’s a whole ‘nother story), there is this peach orchard. This peach orchard is probably one of the most beautiful places in the whole world, IMO, if not the single most beautiful. Especially in early spring when the peach trees bloom: a delicious shade of bright pinkish violet. You drive around a curve in this wooded, windy, rural road, and the forest clears and then the orchard opens up before you, sprawled out over the rolling hills: just fields and fields of these pinkish-violet trees, surrounded by farmland, and off in the distance, the Blue Ridge Mountains. It’s the kind of place that makes you homesick for the place while you’re already there. The kind of landscape that you just want to kind of lay down on and melt into, to really be a part of it. It’s my favorite. This is a location that I’ve fictionalized and worked into numerous stories and books. It’s kind of central to my little fictional world. And over the years, I’ve always gone there, often solo but sometimes with family, to celebrate personally-significant days. It’s something of a tradition. And but so peaches, in general, always remind me of this place and give me a little mood boost.

    4 and a half. Cranberry. The quintessential Christmas and Thanksgiving fruit, i.e. the official fruit of my the most wonderful time of the year. I couldn’t not throw it in here, because, as you know if you read this blog (which no one does, lol), I’m an absolute simp for Christmas. It always makes me want to write new stuff, and is one of my most productive times of the year, writing-wise. And especially holiday baking. I’m not much of a baker myself, I prefer watching it on TV and reading about it to actually doing it; but one thing I make just about every year is a cranberry-pumpkin-nut quick bread with orange zest. So the mere mention of cranberries gives me a little shot of inspiration any time of the year.

    4. Apple. Again, this one’s a bit of a personal nostalgia thing. When I was a little child (like four onwards), my family made an annual fall pilgrimage to this apple orchard in the city near our home. I say “city” because it was technically in that city’s postal code, but this was a rural area, up on a mountain. Typical fall family stuff: we’d go for a hay ride, pick apples, eat donuts and drink hot cider (this was back in the day when fall days were cold), and buy a pumpkin. And so apple orchards also have a special place in my little heart. My dream house has always been an old white farmhouse adjoining an apple orchard. Also because apples are basically the perfect fruit. I know I said I wasn’t going to ramble about my little personal flavor preferences, here, because that’s stupid and uninteresting, but, if I could only eat one fruit for the rest of my life, it would 100% be apples. Like eggs, hummus, and peanut butter, they’re just one of those naturally perfect foods.

    3. Blackberry. Are you tired of me rambling about my childhood yet? (“So what! What’s the point,” my professor is screaming at me in my head right now! Aah!) Anyway, real quick: I grew up in a literal log cabin on a little dirt road in the woods, and said cabin was surrounded by wild blackberry bushes. I’d pick and eat them all the time, sometimes so many that I’d make myself sick! And in late summer my Mom would pick all of these blackberries and make jars and jars of homemade jelly. The really cool thing was, instead of using the store-bought pectin, she’d use underripe green apples from the little baby apple tree in our backyard (which tree is, in itself, a whole ‘nother story, but anyway); did you know that tiny unripe apples are rich in pectin? So the smell of blackberries and sour green apples and sugar is like the smell of my childhood summers. Also, another anecdote: blackberries were like the signature fruit at one of the little casual-dining restaurants off the Parkway where my family would stop sometimes on our little family outings. They did a really cool blackberry ice cream. Thus, blackberries are one of the fruits that sing to my heart the most.

    2. Blackcurrant. What an underrated fruit! What a thing of beauty! I didn’t discover blackcurrant until traveling to Europe for the first time, a trip to Ireland in ‘07. They like to flavor things with blackcurrant over there. It’s such a different flavor from any of our typical American fruity flavors. So dark and alluring and mystical. I got rather hooked on it, especially in drinks and beverages, but also in spreads (my favorite Irish food?: brown soda bread with blackcurrant jam in the morning, what a happy memory). In Germany, you see a lot of “forest fruits”-flavored desserts and spreads, which usually feature blackcurrant, and being obsessed with the Black Forest region and all its fairytale associations, this is another flavor that brings me inspiration. Cassis (what a fun word, too) is also one of the fragrance elements is my all-time favorite perfume, which has sadly been discontinued; and it’s the signature scent of one of my favorite fictional characters I’ve created.

    And finally:

    1. Fig. Another underrated gem of the produce world. Did you know they’re not actually a fruit, but a syconium, i.e. an inside-out bouquet of flowers? And that, in the wild, figs actually ingest wasps? They’re one of the most interesting “fruits” out there, for sure. I first got into figs when, in 2010-11, dried figs mysteriously became one of my daily “safe” foods during a restrictive phase of my ED. For a long time, figs were my go-to thing. Then later, around the time of my conversion, I learned about the legend associated with Saint Rita, to whom I developed my first devotion. My obsession with them might also be related to the word “figment,” as in “a figment of your imagination,” which word/phrase has always been pretty personally meaningful to me. Anyway, I’ve featured figs in at least one or two of my major fiction projects, because they’re just so freaking cool. Maybe I’m a dork for thinking figs are “freaking cool,” but, so be it.

    I hope this has been at least mildly interesting for you, lol.

←Previous Page
1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 14
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • MiTHology (4.0)
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • MiTHology (4.0)
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar