• — about/contact —
    • — hello —
    • — latest —
    • mith reacts to stuff
      • baking shows
    • screaming into the void
    • stories

MiTHology (4.0)

  • Baking Championship Next Gen Season 1 Episode 3: Mith Reacts

    January 21st, 2026

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for this episode of BCNG!

    “Your marshmallows have become one with the universe.” – Duff, judging Abby and Cameron’s s’mores empanadas

    Week three: vacation desserts. The teams were assigned to bake desserts inspired by things they’ve eaten while traveling.

    This got me thinking. What would you make for this challenge?

    Like last week, I’m at a loss. I’ve traveled a fair bit (nowhere near as much as Harper and Holland though, damn! 15+ countries before they’re even twelve years old?! As I said to my husband: oh, they’re rich rich) – but as you know, I don’t really eat a lot of sweets usually. So, I don’t really have any “vacation dessert” associations in my memory banks.

    There was in fact only one trip that I took that happened to coincide with a rare, more permissive, sweet-eating phase of my life: a trip to Germany in ‘09. I was a complete fatass on that trip, and I’m actually not just making fun of myself this time; I was literally quite fat, at my highest weight ever. This was during what I now refer to as my “revenge fat” phase, which occurred in between two restrictive periods, like a very drastic pendulum swing, and was just a really horrible and depressing time in general, and is making me depressed to even think about. So, to get to the point, I consumed a lot of things in Germany… so many things.

    Nutella, for one. In ‘09, Nutella was still a rather uncommon thing in my part of the US, not yet mainstream; so seeing it everywhere in Germany was very exciting, and my fat ass inhaled a lot of it. It was in vending machines! It was on my host family’s breakfast table every morning! It was wherever I went! It was like my only friend, on that horrible Godforsaken trip! So, yeah, maybe I’d make something Nutella-themed. Some kind of Nutella-filled pie or tart. What about you?

    Anyway, back to the kids. Out of nine teams, three did Florida-inspired desserts. That tracks, considering the age range of these contestants; they’re in their peak Disney era. Then we had two France, one London, one Hawaii, one Arizona, and one Washington, D.C.

    The D.C. one came from Abigail and Kenneth. They were my favorite this episode (shh, don’t tell Food Network, I don’t want them getting sent home next week), not only because D.C. is the only one of these locations that I’ve actually been to, but also because I really sympathized when they said “we don’t travel much,” because they stay too busy on the farm. Humble, simple folk! Country mice in the big city! Love it. I kind of hope they win the whole thing now.

    Although, good luck beating Leia and Kiera. Everyone named them as their #1 fiercest competitor, and it’s plain to see why. Those passionfruit eclairs looked phenomenal! Those girls know what they’re doing, that’s for sure.

    Time to complain now! Maybe I’m being cynical here, but when Harper and Holland went up for judging, and little Holland kept talking about the “Unique” Jack – I kind of suspected that her sister and/or her parents or someone had told her to say it that way, because it would look so cute. Is it just me? Was that acting? These girls just seem too precious to be real, lol I almost get the impression that they’re acting. Well, whether it’s an act or not, they’re doing a fabulous job; they’re obviously very much in their element in front of the TV cameras.

    A bummer of an outcome this week. Both of my husband’s favorite teams were in the bottom two. I was surprised that Jovie and Lenore got such negative feedback; that galette des rois looked like it had turned out beautifully, didn’t it? I kinda feel like the judging was maybe a little too harsh on them because the judges expected more from last week’s winners?

    And then, poor little Taanvi and Kavya going home. It was fair enough – their chai-spiced macarons did basically disintegrate, unfortunately – and they handled it very gracefully, without any tears. I will miss them and their goofiness.

    Enough complaining, time for stats:

    Superlatives from the judges: 0 (running total: 2)

    Kid who most deserved a hug: Abigail: when Abby (of Abby and Cameron)’s caramel burned, and Abigail came up and was trying to be encouraging and friendly like “that happened on my mom’s brand-new stove one time!” and Abby was just like “… oh… great.” LOL I’m sure Abby was probably just really flustered in that moment, and probably trying to think of what to do next, but I felt bad for poor Abigail, getting brushed off like that.

    Kid who most deserved a high five: Genesis, just because I loved her positivity. The judges were disappointed that the jalapeño didn’t come through in their cupcake, but Genesis just seemed really steady and glowing and focused on the compliments they got on their mango sponge. Also, really bold choices: not only baking with jalapeño for the first time ever on a TV show, but also using that bright blue frosting! I just love her confidence, and she clearly knows cake.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: It was going to be Abigail and Kenneth’s cherry tart, but the judges said that it was kind of lackluster and needed another element; so, guess I’ll have to go with Leia and Kiera’s passionfruit eclairs with coconut ganache. Normally I’m not big on tropical flavors, but these just looked and sounded really special, with that flaked coconut on top. I’ll be very surprised if they don’t win the 25k. On to next week. What did you think? Leave me your comments!

  • “Run Away” (2026): a Defense, & a Complaint

    January 16th, 2026

    Caution: Spoilers for the limited series “Run Away” (2026) on Netflix, which is based on the book by Harlan Coben, so this probably contains spoilers for the book too.

    The Defense

    Wait, so I just Googled and saw that apparently people are hating on this show? What, why? FFS. Redditors really are the most insufferable people. They hate everything, including each other and everyone else. Every time I decide to casually check something on Reddit, I always leave feeling like I need a shower. All of the criticisms in this discussion – “this was stupid,” “that was stupid” – I must really be incredibly stupid indeed, then, because I loved this show.

    Okay, I will admit that it did overuse the “dramatic musical sting” effect, especially in that one scene. And I will also give them this, that it did seem totally out of the blue how Simon randomly remembered his wife’s old modelling photos at the end of the show like that; that seemed to come out of the blue. Maybe the circumstances leading to his decision were explained better in the book.

    As for the Reddit remarks about gun ownership in the UK and the availability of same-day DNA test results for significantly less than 10K, I can’t comment on that, other than to say that, for me as an ignorant American, it was convincing enough. I once had a writing professor tell me that fiction writers don’t necessarily have to get everything 100% realistic and accurate – they just have to be confident and sell it. And IMO, Harlan Coben really sold it.

    One other minor complaint that my husband and I had was: why is the wife in a medically-induced coma for weeks after a shot to the shoulder, when Simon suffered pretty much the same exact injury and was out and about just a few days later? We kept wondering why she was still comatose, lol. Maybe this, too, is explained better in the book.

    And now that they mention it, I guess it was pretty silly that Paige was just in rehab the whole time. Like really? While a missing persons report was active? And while her dad was running around getting in all kinds of trouble with drug dealers and such? The wife and her sister knew all along but were keeping it a secret, even through all of this high-stakes drama, simply because Paige has asked them to because she didn’t want Dad to be disappointed? That was the whole reason? 🤔 Imagine how Ingrid will feel when she finds out her husband blew 70k on this while she was asleep. 70k! In retrospect, the rehab thing just didn’t feel like an expensive enough secret.

    However: none of these issues took away from my enjoyment of the show while I was watching it. I guess that makes me an idiot. Oh well, that’s not news to any of us around here, is it?

    I agree that glaring plot holes do ruin the effect of a story… but I guess in the case of “Run Away,” the holes were, well, not exactly “small/minor” enough, but “sold” well enough that they just didn’t bother me. They blended in. It didn’t feel lazy. It’s like how some people pay good money for ripped jeans. Sure they have holes, but it works!, they look cool!

    Like a great pair of ripped jeans, this show, as entertainment, is a 10/10 from me. It’s everything I needed it to be. The storytelling, the pacing, the characters, the twists – no complaints there. Totally engrossing. Just peak escapism.

    I’ve never read any Harlan Coben books before, but now I think I probably will. As you know if you read this blog, I am very much in awe of mystery/suspense writers. They’re like sorcerers to me. The ability to captivate a reader/viewer like that, and hold their whole attention span and their emotions in the palm of your hand — to be so wildly entertaining that you can get away with a plot hole or two: it’s a superpower. I’d love to know how they do that.

    This was, in some ways, a pretty standard crime thriller – formulaic, some even said – but there were a few things it did that kind of flipped the stereotype on its head, which particularly delighted me:

    1, When Elena’s “tech person,” the computer whiz who can hack into anywhere and find out anything online, is her little 75 year old MIL, Lou.

    2, Isaac + Ruby’s relationship. I know all the Reddit critics called it “unnecessary,” and maybe it was, but if we always boil a story down to just what’s “necessary,” what are we left with? A single Tweet? A 20-second reel? Why even read (or watch), if you only want what’s “necessary”? Come on now. Imo the love story added something of value. And the thing I really liked about it was, for once we see a very fit, conventionally-attractive man completely enamored of a heavyset woman with a sharp wit and sense of humor. And she seems to wield the power in their relationship: he wants to go public with it, she wants to keep it a secret because of work. Not to mention the way she objectifies him for fun, lol. I’m very much here for this role reversal (and their happy ending).

    3, Professor VdB actually being a good guy. It would have been so easy to include another tropey, creepy male professor. I’m kinda glad they showed that it was actually just rumors perpetuated by thirsty female students.

    Overall, 10/10 entertainment. I will say though that I had just one serious complaint about the plot. And it is more of a philosophical disagreement than a technical criticism.

    The Complaint

    When Elena finds out that her dead husband’s secret child was the product of not an affair, but of his so generously donating his sperm to a female friend who wanted to have a baby… and never telling his wife about it… and this exonerates him, in her eyes? She can now forgive him? 🤮 As I told my husband, I would actually much rather he have some passionate affair with another woman than deliberately conceive a child with another woman. Because the latter is so much more serious! Passion is fleeting and meaningless, but the human soul, joined to the body at the moment of conception, is eternal. And the fact that Joel did this knowing that Elena, his wife, couldn’t conceive a child – what a slap in the face! If I were Elena, I wouldn’t have gone and gotten myself killed because I’d be too busy trying to get a posthumous divorce, and/or drawing dicks all over Joel’s headstone with a Sharpie.

    For me as a Catholic, this whole brushing off of the seriousness of Joel’s offense as “a selfless favor for a friend,” is just a glaring symptom of our culture’s distorted views on human reproduction. Children are not commodities that you can just decide to piece together at your convenience just because you want one. (Ironic, that this gross offense is cast in such a positive light in this show, while in the same breath the show decries illegal adoptions and the selling of babies, when these two are basically the same thing.) Children are the fruit of the singular, sacred love between husband + wife, co-created by God and entrusted by Him to those parents. When people try to play God with “reproductive technology,” surrogacy, sperm donation, what have you, it distorts that design. (And all kinds of bad things happen: surrogate mothers forced to undergo abortion if the “customer” changes their mind; wrong embryos implanted in the wrong mothers; not to mention the emotional/psychological distress and confusion that comes from being cut off from your biological relations (I mean just look at the whole plot of this show!); & et cetera.) Your DNA, your lineage, isn’t just something you should give away to a buddy or sell to someone who wants to buy it. Children are not products to be bought and sold.

    In Conclusion

    But, to step off my little soapbox, that’s the only thing that pissed me off about the show. Everything else is excusable, even Elena stupidly hopping in that car with Dee Dee, which was out of character for her. Super entertaining show, tight twists and turns, suspenseful as heck, even some bonus beautiful British scenery thrown in; don’t listen to those bitter Redditors who never like anything anyway.

    I especially loved the slightly ambiguous ending. A lingering question is such a juicy cherry on top of a story, for me. Will he tell Ingrid the truth about Aaron, or will he not? IMO, he absolutely should not. Because what good would that accomplish? Why burden her with that knowledge? He better take that secret to the grave. But if you disagree, my inbox is always open, feel free to make your case.

  • Baking Championship Next Gen Season 1 Episode 2: Mith Reacts

    January 15th, 2026

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for this episode of BCNG!

    Posting this a day late, sorry! Can you believe I completely forgot that this show was on last night? It’s hard to believe, but I simply forgot about Baking Championship because (a) as mentioned, I’m just not quite as excited about Next Gen as I usually am about baking shows, and (b) my husband and I were super immersed in the finale of a different show (more on that forthcoming).

    So, last week was the “tryouts,” and now the real competition begins. It was nice to see the set looking all bright and bold and exciting again. Last week it definitely looked kind of, well, not there yet, and I was feeling mildly disappointed; but now, at last, it looks like the Baking Championship set that we know and love.

    Family favorite desserts, decorated to give a nod to family traditions. What would yours be? This is sad, and embarrassing to admit as a SAHM, but: my family doesn’t really have any such desserts.

    My parents – neither of them have a lot of cozy childhood memories, whether of food or just in general, I think. There was a lot of sadness in their home lives. And, being boomers, both of them have always been deeply entrenched in diet culture. So, ours wasn’t exactly a “grandma’s chocolate chip cookies”-type household.

    The only sweet treat that I remember being made semi-regularly in my childhood home was my mom’s chocolate fudge, which I’ve written about on here before. I’ve tried to make this fudge myself exactly one time, as an adult, and it failed epically. So I don’t feel I’ve earned the right to say that I’d re-create that on TV.

    My husband didn’t inherit any special recipes, either. His mother, who’s an artist and decorator, prefers other hobbies over being in the kitchen, and his father, according to the stories I’ve heard, just slapped together all kinds of manly dishes like pork chops, meat loaf, mushrooms, and sauerkraut, but didn’t make desserts. So, my husband and I, we just don’t come from those kinds of families.

    Which feels shitty, because I feel like I ought to be that kind of mom, and I’m failing if I’m not.

    Now that I have my own kids, I do bake with them occasionally. I’m trying to make it happen. I would really like to have some Traditional Family Recipes that my kids will remember with nostalgia one day… but, for us, it’s just not like that. Not yet, at least.

    In our house, baking is always kind of… an experiment. It’s not like we bake tried-and-true recipes because we want the resulting product. It’s more like a time filler – “let’s try this for fun” – or a specific, targeted seasonal/educational activity, like when we made apple pastry “roses” on St. Thérèse’s feast day, or gingerbread cookies at Christmas.

    As much as I love to watch baking shows, in my own daily life I kinda struggle with the idea of baking, tbh; it just doesn’t seem practical. All that money spent on ingredients, all that precious time spent, all that mess made in the kitchen, just for an end result that, if it even gets eaten, won’t provide us with much nutritional value. I know it’s not a great way to think, but as someone with creative Te in socionics, I have a really hard time doing stuff that doesn’t have a greater purpose or serve some function. “So what” is a question I’m always wrestling with. It can be kind of demotivating.

    Probably the only actual dessert that I “bake” semi-regularly nowadays is a summer berry icebox cake that I make every year around the Fourth of July. I love it because I’m a terrible baker, and an icebox cake doesn’t actually require any baking, hahaha. So, maybe I’d recreate something like that, for a “family recipe”-themed challenge, if I were a contestant on this show: blueberries and strawberries with white chocolate and vanilla layers. Maybe I’d decorate it with some Catholic theme, like arranging the berries in the shape of rosary beads (kind of like the edible rosaries that I make with the kids every year on the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary, out of stuff like Cheerios and M&Ms). Curious to know what you all would make for this challenge!

    Anyway, enough about me. This week, halfway through the challenge, Kardea invited the kids to join her in a short “dance break,” and whoever had the best moves ended up winning five extra minutes for their bake time. This would have been unbearably cringey if it were adults, and I kinda take issue with rewarding the bakers for something entirely not baking related… but with kids, it was pretty funny. Cameron from Philly ended up winning – “I locked in,” he said proudly afterwards, which made me giggle like a maniac. But Abby and Cameron didn’t really end up needing the extra five minutes for their chocolate chip blondies, so Cameron passed the prize on to Leila and Melody, who were struggling to finish their chocolate-raspberry-pistachio cake in time. How gracious! What a little gentleman. And it really helped Leila and Melody, because they spent that extra five minutes making that pink cake look gorgeous. With those raspberries perched pertly on top of the little buttercream swirls. Well done, girls.

    It’s funny: I’m not as into this show as I am the adult versions, but my husband actually seems to like it better. He likes that there’s no angst and melodrama, lol. (Imagine that!) And he’s really rooting for Taanvi and Kavya, the goofballs. (Kavya especially reminds him of our younger daughter, our goblin, who’s always bouncing around and asking random questions like that: “what happens if the cameraman needs to go to the bathroom?”) When they were in the bottom two, my husband literally had to hide his face behind a pillow until it was over, so full of dread was he at the thought of them going home. Thankfully, they made it through to next week.

    Although, I feel bad for Olivia and Norah. I was pretty sure it was going to be them going home, I mean, come on. Two and a half hours and all they produced was a mediocre cookie. (What a shame – chocolate cherry thumbprint does sound phenomenal, and the presentation was about as fancy as could be for a simple cookie!) But, the fact that they were the only ones who refused to dance in the dance break – lol, I related to that so hard. That definitely would have been me.

    Also of note this week:

    – Genesis and Akbar. After struggling through the challenge and barely finishing with some rather sloppy decorations, their German chocolate cake ended up being one of the best-tasting on the set. These two seem to really know their stuff!

    – Leia and Kiera obviously brought their A game again, with that stunning little Meyer lemon cake that looked like two adults made it. I think they might actually be adult professional bakers in clever disguises.

    – Taanvi and Kavya did peaches again. Second consecutive peach dessert. Do you think this will become a thing, for them?

    – Little Harper and Holland with the berry-flavored whipped cream was a peak baking show moment.

    – And, can we talk about Abigail and Kenneth? How much butter did he put into their cake? He didn’t know! “What do you mean, you don’t know?!” LMAO, do you think they’re like that at home? Their little tractor design on their cake was so cute though, and no one commented on this particular detail but I loved the black and yellow sprinkles around the bottom border. Very original. What a team, what a delight: Kenneth the little ray of sunshine with a lisp, and tough, take-no-shit farm girl Abigail. I love these two, and would happily watch a reality show about their life on the farm.

    Which brings us to nine teams remaining. Next week, I’ll try to be on time. Let’s go:

    Superlatives from the judges: 1, Duff telling Harper & Holland that that was the “best looking kladkakka he’d ever seen” (running total: 2)

    Kid who most deserved a hug: Genesis, after accidentally baking her chocolate cakes with no dry ingredients! The way those things bubbled and gurgled in the oven like they’d come to life, lol. For real though, I’ve done this before, and it’s devastating.

    Kid who most deserved a high five: Cameron, for passing on his “Five Extra Minutes” to Leila and Melody.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Definitely Jovie & Lenore’s Cherry Cream Cheese Pie. I might be misusing the modern slang here, because I’m at that age now, but I’m pretty sure today’s youth would say that Jovie and Lenore “ate and left no crumbs.” Gooey cherries, nice thick cream cheese filling layer, and graham cracker crust. With the little guitar on top! This one spoke to my heart. I might just try to copycat this at home — next time I find a good-enough reason to go to all the trouble of baking something.

  • On Unaliving: Another Unpopular Opinion

    January 10th, 2026
    Daily writing prompt
    If you could un-invent something, what would it be?
    View all responses

    Here we go! I just know I’m going to get a lot of flak for this one. (If anyone actually reads this post, that is, which I highly doubt anyone actually will; it’s majorly annoying to me when I post an answer to a Prompt and get a ton of “spam likes” on it from people who don’t even read the post but just want to draw attention to their own blog and get me to subscribe to it. If that’s you, please just don’t even bother clicking “like.” I’m not going to follow spammers.)

    Especially as a Catholic blogger, I expect my answer to this question won’t win me any fans or friends. My fellow Catholics are surely not going to agree with this. The thing is, I’m a traditionalist (some might even say a radical one), and as such, when it comes to American politics, I lean conservative, definitely more to the right than the left. But on this one particular issue, I don’t really line up with other right-wingers.

    But I’m going to post it anyway, because it’s something I’ve felt strongly about for a long time — indeed, I’ve been saying for years and years that I wish I could go back in time and un-invent this thing, that I think it would do a lot of good in the world if this thing were simply erased from existence. And what is even the point of this stupid little blog if I can’t use it to voice my weird and unpopular opinions?

    I don’t usually like to get political here, but for me, this one’s more of a common sense issue than a political one. The thing that I’d like to uninvent is (and hear me out): firearms.

    In this post, I will briefly explain why I would un-invent guns, and then I will address some potential objections that I foresee readers having to my argument. Finally, I will get to how this relates to the more immediate and real-world issue of gun control in the US.

    Why guns?: Because, they do more harm than good. They make it too easy to kill humans. It should not be that easy to kill someone. That’s it. It’s really that simple.

    Now, I’m fully aware that guns are not the real problem, when we’re talking about the gun violence epidemic. “The real problem is mental health,” some people say, and that is kinda true — but IMO the real reason people’s mental health is so poor is that we’re living in a Godless society. “We have a mental illness epidemic” is just secularese for “we need Jesus.” (Not that mental health issues aren’t real — of course they are, and devout Christians can suffer from them even while practicing their faith sincerely — it’s just that our society is handling things, including mental health, very poorly because our society is so secular, and many mental health conditions have reached epidemic status because of this Godlessness.) If I may be so bold as to diagnose grave societal ills while sitting in a recliner and nursing my baby, the real problem here IMO is not guns, not mental health, but, frankly, lack of a healthy fear of God.

    And the solution, i.e. the conversion of society and the subjection of American culture to Christ the King, is a very slow, very gradual work in progress. In the meantime, we need to do something to stop the bloodshed — to reduce the harm done while this mental/spiritual healing takes place.

    Think of it this way. Let’s say that a violent criminal breaks into your home and has your spouse and children at gunpoint. Magically, time suddenly pauses, and you are presented with two options for how things will proceed: option A, when time un-freezes, a psychiatrist and therapist and/or priest will appear to have a talk with this criminal and try to calm him down and work on his mental/spiritual health, which are of course the real problem here after all. Or, option B, when time un-freezes, his gun will magically disappear.

    Tell me, who in their right mind would not choose option B? We must neutralize the threat before we can work on the problem.

    This is the situation that our country is in. True, guns are not the problem, but we still need to get rid of them, to minimize damage while we address the real problem, which will take time.

    “But Mith, what about self defense? Protecting our loved ones and our property?“: If no one had a gun to threaten you with, you wouldn’t have to have a gun to defend yourself, would you? Okay, so maybe someone’s threatening you with an edged weapon of some sort; you’d probably have one too. In a world with no guns, maybe folks would just fight each other with blades or clubs or their bare hands or some such, like cavemen. In this world, you’d necessarily have some other tool or skill to fight back with.

    Because it goes without saying that doing away with guns would not do away with crime or violence. It’s true that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” — but it’s also true that guns make it way too easy to kill people. At least if we were using blades, clubs, or our bare hands, there’d need to be some kind of physical exertion, some kind of athleticism — you’d have to earn it. And yes, I’m aware that shooting well is a skill and an art. But that doesn’t change the fact that it removes the killer from the victim in an unnatural way — it reduces killing to, essentially, the push of a button. It shouldn’t be like that. If you’re going to kill someone, to take a human life, you should have the skill, the strength, the prowess, and the sheer guts to do it in a manner that honors the seriousness of that purpose.

    If you wanted to defend your property, you could do so with other methods. Like a moat, or archery, or martial arts, or, I dunno, a freaking trebuchet or something. I’m no weapons expert. I’m just saying, we should bring back the medieval style. People still managed to kill each other, and defend themselves, back then, and they did so in much more respectable, authentically human ways.

    “But guns allow me to defend myself from a safe distance.” Try archery? Or, to get real medieval with it, axe-throwing?

    “But those are hard to do.” Well, painting a picture or writing a book is harder than churning out some AI-generated slop, but it’s still better to do things the human way. It takes more effort to grow and cook your own food than it does to order fast food, but the former is better for you than the latter. It takes more effort and self-denial to meet someome, marry them, put their needs before your own, and accept responsibility than it does to just sit and watch porn on the internet, but it is still better to do things the human way. Most things that are better and more human require effort, require work. That’s just part of being human (Genesis 3:17).

    “But what about hunting? Like for food?” Ethics of hunting and eating animals aside (another issue on which I don’t quite line up with other Catholics and Conservatives): the Native Ameicans did alright with bows and arrows and traps, didn’t they?

    “Firearms have made warfare much more efficient. It’s easier now to take down bad guys.” Sure, but if the bad guys didn’t have guns either, because guns simply didn’t exist, then it wouldn’t be as easy for them to take us down, either. And honestly, should something like war/killing others be “efficient”? The only time when I think it might be appropriate to speak of “efficient” killing is when it comes to executing criminals, in which situation we have things like lethal injections. (However, even then I’m not sure if there’s really a need for an “efficient” means of execution, because if someone’s committed a crime that merits the death penalty, then they probably deserve to suffer; I kind of believe that the families of the victims ought to be given the privilege of deciding how to dispose of the criminal, in such cases, but that’s just my opinion, and probably veering into questionable territory, ethically.) Or like if the zombie apocalypse happens and you need to take out some zombies. Use a crossbow, I guess, like Daryl Dixon, lol? Is the probability of a zombie apocalypse or like a hostile alien invasion really realistically high enough to justify the risks of civilians owning assault rifles? I think not, but please, try and prove me wrong if you want.

    “But guns are cool.” I know some people out there just really like guns. I get it. I can see the appeal. And I acknowledge that firearms are a complex category of tools with a long and fascinating history (well, fascinating for some, I guess). But at the same time, I think we should ask ourselves if this is really a healthy obsession to have. Why do we like guns so much? Why does the thought of killing, or of being able to kill, get us so excited? Is it actually good, to indulge that thirst for power over our fellow man? As someone with plenty of unhealthy habits and questionable tastes in things (completely aware that I’m a pot calling a kettle black here): I really think a passion for guns is morally questionable and probably not a great one to indulge.

    “Okay, sure, but there’s no way to undo the invention of firearms. They exist in the world, so at this point the best thing to do is teach responsible gun ownership, not to try and take guns away, which would just leave citizens vulnerable.“

    This brings me to my conclusion. Yes, I’m obviously aware that it’s unrealistic to want to do away with guns entirely. We’ll sadly never be a pre-firearm world again. In these circumstances, I do think civilians should be allowed to own guns for self-defense and/or hunting… within reason. I think there need to be way more restrictions than there currently are. For one, no civilian needs an assault rifle for any reason. You’re not going to change my mind on that. We need a lot more restrictions than we have. Although, of course, in order to have sane restrictions, we’d have to have sane, trustworthy people in power, which is probably not a realistic thing to hope for, given that all Ameican politics are basically money-motivated. So I’m aware that it’s a complicated issue, and I’m don’t know enough to prescribe exactly what kind of restrictions we need or how to implement them. But I do know that more needs to be done.

    It goes without saying that we need better gun control in the US. Look at Japan. Some of the most rigorous restrictions on gun ownership in the world, and one of the lowest rates of gun violence (source, source). It’s honestly bizarre to me how anyone can say that America doesn’t urgently need to restrict gun ownership. Don’t even get me started on school shootings. If those killers’ parents simply had not had guns in their homes, none of those murders would have even happened. Or at least, not nearly as many.

    Doesn’t it go without saying? I just can’t understand people who come up with all kinds of convoluted philosophical defenses for why it’s okay to not take guns away, when our children are actively getting murdered on the regular. And yes, as a conservative I think government’s control of our everyday lives should be limited — limited, but not zero. We do need government. Human societies do need some restrictions in order to ensure our safety. I genuinely do not see how it’s not obvious.

    If you have a very strong pro-gun argument though, my inbox is always open. In fact, many intelligent people that I know and respect are, mystifyingly, pro-gun, so, I’m honestly curious and even open to having my mind changed; I’d love to understand the logic here, to know how people justify their position, especially as Catholics. It’s just that, as of yet, nothing I’ve read or heard has presented a strong enough argument to make me reconsider. “Unalienable” this and “constitutional” that, yeah yeah, that means nothing to me in light of an event like Sandy Hook, and I challenge anyone to change my mind.

  • Baking Championship Next Gen Season 1 Premiere: Mith Reacts

    January 7th, 2026

    CAUTION: CONTAINS SPOILERS for this episode of BCNG!

    Alright, here we go. Baking Championship: Next Gen – this one is sort of a wild card, for me.

    I typically do not watch kids’ baking competition shows. I’ve tried, but it just doesn’t grab me. They’re just a little too wholesome and clean, for my taste; as you know, I live for the drama, the angst, the intensity. In kids’ versions, the judging is, of course, always gentler, and the bakes less technically impressive – although, at the same time, it’s also more impressive, in a way, because all these literal children are such better bakers than I am! It does make me feel a bit inferior, lol, which, in that way, makes it actually more depressing to watch! And also, it just feels more senselessly cruel, when the kids get sad. If an adult breaks down in tears over baked goods, it’s sad but it’s also relatable, dramatic, compelling, and draws me in as a viewer. But when a kid cries on reality TV, my maternal instinct can’t really take it – it just feels bad. Nothing fun about it, not at all. So overall I find the kids’ versions of these shows less enthralling and satisfying; they activate a whole different emotional spectrum in me than the adult versions.

    But I decided to watch this one anyway. Why, you ask? Well, two reasons: one, I don’t have any other baking shows right now (why did they stop making Sugar Rush?! Why did they stop making Zumbo and Nailed It!?). And as you know, I’m addicted to baking shows, so even a less-satisfying one still fills the void. (“Are you liking this at all?” my husband asked me, halfway through tonight’s episode, sensing the dissatisfaction emanating from me, as only a partner of 10+ years can. “It’s like park coke for Kendall Roy,” I replied. Which reference is super inappropriate for a discussion of a kids’ show, but, whatever, this is still Mith’s blog.)

    And, reason number two: as you may have noticed, I haven’t been posting on this blog as much in the past week, which is because I’ve decided, in my free time, to try my hand at writing some Middle Grade fiction! Which is something I haven’t done since I was middle grade age myself, and I feel kind of rusty on it; what are kids that age even like?! So, I’m kind of treating BCNG as research, as a way to study how kids this age actually behave and talk and interact. (Even when I was that age, I was hardly a “normal kid,” lol, so I honestly have no clue.) Why write middle grade, then, you ask? Your guess is as good as mine. It’s so unnatural for me – so much action, so little rumination! The minds of kids this age are fascinating. I don’t have any kids in the 8-14 range yet – my oldest is only five – so they’re kind of a mystery to me. This should be a learning experience.

    So, Mith, you may be asking, what are your thoughts on “Next Gen” thus far? Well… I guess it’s not un-fun. As mentioned, I just don’t really click with middle grade. But it will hold me over, I guess, until Spring Baking returns. And there are things that I like about it. The bright and airy set and the back-to-basics challenges are refreshing after all the holly jolly madness of Holiday. And, of course, I like all of the contestants so much.

    It’s so hard to pick a “favorite” contestant, when the contestants are children. All of them are so precious. However, one of the teams that stood out to me the most, and I guess you could call them one of my “favorites,” did, predictably, end up being one of the two that got sent home first. The Curse of Mith’s Favorite strikes again! I’m so sorry, Liam and Michael. Those two were adorable, and such a good team; I loved their positivity. They were such “dude bro,” “tough guy” types while still being so warm and good-natured and sweet. The way they supported each other! Their parents have clearly done a good job (and they have two other boys, as well!). I hope these two don’t lose that energy as they grow up. As adults, they will be the very picture of positive, healthy masculinity!

    I guess their elimination was fair, though. Their yellow cupcake was apparently “tough,” and their apple pie just did not work out. I was literally shouting at the TV: just re-start your pie dough! Why did they not just chuck that mess in the bin and start over?? Lord knows I’ve been there before, with pie dough – too wet, add more flour, then it’s too dry so add more water, then too wet again, add more flour… dude! Just start over! It would’ve saved you time, and it’s not like there’s any shortage of ingredients, on the Baking Championship set. And then, unfortuntately, their decorative toppers didn’t look like much of anything, and the apples looked dry.

    That was too painful. It does make me wonder: are they allowed to use recipes on this show? I still don’t know. I was actually watching a livestream on Instagram the other night with Charles, Ashleigh, and Alyx from Holiday Baking, and people kept writing into the chat asking if they were allowed to use recipes on the show, but Alyx insinuated that they were not allowed to answer that question. Weird! If these kids aren’t allowed to use recipes, that’s intense – and makes it even more impressive when they succeed. It’s impressive either way.

    But speaking of dry pies, there were at least three of them this challenge! Abigail and Kenneth’s peach pie didn’t have enough goo. Abby and Cameron’s apple pie was just as dry as Liam and Michael’s. And Leila and Melody straight up drained all the goo off their pecan pie – the best part of a pecan pie! Wild. Although, I could really relate to big sis, when at the end of the episode she was wondering aloud why on earth she had done that. When I’m anxious or under pressure I make stupid decisions as well.

    My other “favorite” team (if you can call it that) is still in the game. Harper and Holland! What darlings! Are they like that in real life, I wonder, or are they playing it up for the camera, with the matching bows and blond hair, the alliterative names, and the sugary, outgoing sort of Disney star vibes. They’re so cute! (Also, their parents have great taste in names: Holland and Harper are two of my favorite “guilty pleasure” girl names, i.e. names that I wouldn’t use on my own kids but absolutely adore on other people’s kids.) Also, these girls created my personal favorite dessert in both challenges: the vanilla cupcake with chocolate ganache filling and that delectable-looking peanut butter-chocolate buttercream, followed by the S’mores Pie – a chocolate pie in a graham cracker crust with a toasted marshmallow topping. And watching little Holland’s reaction when they sliced the pie and the piece came out cleanly – delightful! What a great moment. She’s hilarious.

    Little Holland also had the most one-liners this episode. After Duff and Kardea called their cupcake sponge “tight,” she told her sister: “It was tight – maybe we should take it to the gym so it can stretch!” LOL. And then, after they made it to the end of the episode without getting sent home, she goes: “I’m like screaming! My whole body is so excited!” Lol I’m weeping. You’ve got to love the way kids think and speak; it really sheds light on the bizarre truth that people, all people, really are just babies with experience.

    My sweet husband kindly watches these shows with me, even though they’re not his cup of tea (his cup of tea is sci-fi, fantasy, and horror), as you guys know if you read this blog; and his favorite team is Taanvi and Kavya. Because they are goofballs, and remind him the most of our girls (ages 5.5 and 4.5), who are also goofballs. Being a Southerner myself, I do like that they did a hummingbird cake for their cupcake – and their spicy black pepper peach pie was a bold move.

    Speaking of peaches and the South, I’m also keeping an eye on Jovie and Lenore. They’re here to represent the weird kids, they said, and as a weird kid who also wore purple hair and a necktie at that age, I salute them. Had you ever heard of Seth Thomas before? I had not, and judging by their reaction when Kardea knew what it was, probably most people don’t. I do wonder why their band is named after a brand of clock; probably an inside joke. Ah, I remember being that age and having inside jokes. My middle school BFF and I used to joke about starting a band and calling it “Dying Irish,” which was a whole inside joke that I haven’t even thought about in years if not longer. Which, wow!, see?!, this whole “middle grade research” project is apparently working already — waking up my inner 8-14 year old! Unearthing all those horrible deep core memories! Maybe I should go listen to some Hoku and Vitamin C to really complete the experience.

    I was super bummed that Clara and Amelia’s berry pie was too tart. Raspberry-blueberry-blackberry sounds like an incredible flavor combo, and their decorations were some of the smartest (half lattice, half pie crust cutouts). Also noteworthy for me are Abigail and Kenneth, the farmer kids from the Midwest. Their dynamic as a team is hilarious! I laughed every time they were on the screen. Same with Genesis and Akbar (who absolutely killed it with that sweet potato pie, btw, stunning work) – the bossy big sister/sensitive little brother situation. I also really like Abby and Cameron from Philly – I was relieved that they made it through the pie challenge even though their apple pie was off. I guess their Chai Latte cupcake was good enough to keep them in the running.

    Well, until next week then. I don’t normally watch kids’ baking shows, so I don’t really know what kind of stats to count and what tropes to look out for. If you have any suggestions for stats we should keep track of this season, or if there’s anything else you want to talk about, let me know in the comments. For now, let’s just do the following:

    Superlatives from the judges: 1, Kardea to Leia and Kiera, “one of the best key lime pies I’ve ever had”

    Kid who most deserved a hug: Liam. Why did Kardea not come out to give him a hug and a pep talk?! That’s like her whole thing! She must have been busy somewhere else, because Kardea is the sweetest woman on TV, there’s no way she could have seen that happening and not come to his aid. It killed me to see the poor kid so upset and no grown-up come out to help him.

    Kid who most deserved a high five: Holland, for that beautiful slice of S’mores pie.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Easily, said s’mores pie. Duff said it was “a skosh loose,” but ain’t nothing wrong with that if you ask me; I’m never one to complain about a nice jiggly chocolate pudding.

    Mith’s official prediction for the winning team: Leia and Kiera. With those decorations – the little hazelnut truffle heart on their cupcake, and those fancy little whipped cream swirls filled with raspberry puree on top of their key lime pie – they are pretty clearly on another level! It almost seems unfair. I’m eager to see if any of the other teams can catch up.

  • Am I even a real person?: thoughts on veganism, Catholicism, parenting, & ED recovery

    December 31st, 2025
    Daily writing prompt
    What are your feelings about eating meat?
    View all responses

    My personal thoughts on eating meat? Oh man. It’s such a complicated question, as are all food-related issues for someone with ED history. My stance on meat has changed so many times, in my thirty-six years. At this point I’m an herbivore who understands carnivores and kinda wishes she could be one. I’m also an accidentally, circumstantially militant vegan with an intentionally, philosophically militant vegan living inside me, whom I can unleash at will when the time feels right. I don’t know what I even identify as, or how to explain it. Where do I even begin!

    1. ED-Fueled Vegetarianism

    I guess a reasonable place to start would be the beginning of my vegetarianism — although, I don’t actually remember when that officially was. I kind of became one by accident, and then decided to make it official. The ED came first. I stopped eating pretty much anything, and then realized at some point that I’d become vegetarian (none of my safe foods happened to be meat), and I happily assumed that identity because (a) it was an excuse to say ‘no’ to food, much of the time, and (b) it made me feel morally unimpeachable, as if my weirdness about food was actually some noble and unselfish thing (it was not).

    But so I was vegetarian as a teenager and into my twenties, on and off. My occasional attempts at “recovery,” when forced upon me, coincided with brief forays into meat-eating, as I was often advised not to enforce any hard “food rules” for the sake of my mental health. I had mixed feelings about that. For me eating meat was always a performative thing for myself, like “ha ha, look at me, I’m having a steak, I don’t care anymore!” Invisible middle fingers to the voices in my head. Needless to say, it wasn’t sustainable.

    I think I briefly attempted veganism my junior or senior year of high school, simply out of curiosity; but I found it too demanding then, because dairy is something I’ve always really liked. It was, in fact, a cup of Fage Total with honey that finally swayed me from veganism back then. (Fage is, without question, the best Greek yogurt out there. I dunno what they do to make it so much better than other Greek yogurt; it’s like a different food entirely. No, I’m not being paid to say this.)

    Anyway, about four years after that, I was sick of food freedom and its resulting fatness, and once again on a super restrictive diet and, lo and behold, decided to go vegan again. You see the pattern. I was very serious about it now, and really enjoyed it, and it became a huge part of my identity: reading the philosophy, supporting organizations like PETA, all of it. This phase lasted for a while, went away, and made a resurgence after my second child was born in 2021, then went away again. I can take it out of the box and put it on when I want to, then pack it back up.

    2. The Dormant Angry Vegan

    It’s interesting in retrospect to see how I was (and am) able to look at this belief system from the outside, having no particular emotional connection to it (sure I liked animals, who doesn’t?, but, I’ve never been an “animal lover” per se, nor a hippie nor an environmentalist, and it wasn’t like I’d ever had some heartbreaking, life-changing epiphany about the cruelty in the meat industry or whatever), and just think to myself on some level: “why yes, I think I could happily become a radical animal rights activist. That sounds logically sound and also kinda fun and cool; let’s do it!” And I did really believe it, all that PETA stuff. I read and loved “Animal Liberation” by Peter Singer and “Eating Animals” by Jonathan Safran Foer. I did (and still do) find factory farms deeply appalling and depressing. I truly did get triggered and irritated by people who ate meat. I really did think it was simply an inexcusably ignorant thing to do, and that no meat-eater could ever really call themselves a good person. I completely believed that. (I feel differently about meat-eaters now; more on that later.)

    I could step into this identity, but then, I could just turn it off at will. When I got bored of it, or needed a change in my food lifestyle for whatever reason. Which tells me that I could still do that at any time, if I chose to; if I decide to devote the mental energy to it. Vegan Mith still exists, in there, and if I feed her with vegan literature and vegan content, she will grow stronger. I very well might do this at some point in the future, but right now, I just feel a bit too maxed out, between raising little kids, managing the family meal plan and food budget, and trying to be a good Catholic — in which world it’s very uncommon, btw, and even frowned upon to be vegetarian.

    I do think that if more Catholics were vegetarian/vegan, I’d probably let Vegan Mith rise to the surface again. Or if my husband, or anyone around me, were veggie. But no one in my life is veggie, so Vegan Mith doesn’t get a lot of stimulation or encouragement, and just lies dormant.

    Which shows me something kind of interesting about myself. Apparently it’s true that either (a) my convictions are so feeble that I don’t bother living by them unless it’s amusing or others around me agree with it, or (b) I’m just a fundamentally weak person with few, if any, real convictions.

    3. Accidentally Radical WFPB

    These days, for the sake of convenience and comfort, I’ve mostly just been plain old vegetarian: the kind who will eat eggs but not fish or any other animal. And even this is not because of any moral convictions, really. It’s just that meat is gross to me, after so many years meatless. I actually kinda wish that I could stomach meat, because more protein would probably be good for me (protein is the hottest trend in nutrition right now! I remember when I was young, it was all about fresh produce, whole grains, and low fat/fat free dairy products; wild how the tides turn). But it’s just gross to me. And at this stage in my life, I simply don’t care to devote too much mental energy to the morality of my diet — which, after surviving decades ruled by a crippling obsession with exactly that, is actually kind of refreshing. So I guess I don’t really care that I don’t care.

    But here’s the funny thing. As of writing this post, at age 36, I’ve accidentally become vegan again, and a more strict one than ever before, although not for the animals this time; for an entirely different reason.

    My fourth child, who’s five months old and exclusively breastfed, has a sensitive gut. (I strongly suspect it’s because of the IV antibiotics they gave me during labor.) He can’t tolerate it when I consume dairy, egg, (hello again, veganism), soy, or even corn. And soy and corn are in literally everything, it seems! Virtually every processed food item on the grocery store shelves contains soy or corn ingredients. Did you know that? Even things like the ascorbic acid they put in juice to add vitamins, or the chemicals in imitation vanilla extract, or the added vitamins in breakfast cereal or almondmilk, ALL come from freaking corn!

    A normal person would probably give up breastfeeding at this point, but not I. (I’ve fed formula before, for unfortunate medical reasons, and loathed everything about it, ugh; the stink, the infinite bottles to wash, the ridiculously high prices, the constipated babies, the having to get up out of bed go downstairs and prep a bottle at 3AM, and worst of all the constant anxiety about the very real threat of factory contamination — I don’t know how you formula moms do it. Nursing is so much easier.) So, for nearly a month now, I’ve been on the cleanest diet I’ve ever been on in my life. I literally only drink water and consume whole foods with straight-out-of-nature ingredients that I can identify and pronounce. And my baby’s gut is doing much better (thanks also to Smidge probiotics, which are expensive but totally worth the price, and once again no I’m not getting paid for this).

    Is it hard? For me, not really. I actually love it. The only hard thing for me to give up was almondmilk. But actually, it’s made my life a lot easier, socially speaking. I hate eating in social settings, and hate being offered food, because one layover habit from the years and years of ED is that I prefer to stick with my “safe” foods. And now, I have an excuse! I can’t eat this, I can’t eat that, and for once it’s not that I’m just neurotic — my baby has a sensitive stomach! Tbh I’m kinda dreading my baby turning one (the age when most doctors say these intolerances tend to go away). Because then I’ll have to start pretending to be normal in food situations again.

    And here’s the other funny thing about all this. Eating a completely whole foods plant based diet, with zero “processed” ingredients — it feels amazing! I’ve been doing it for about a month now, and I kid you not, I feel lighter on my feet, more energetic, less bloated, more alert, more generally positive — just more in touch with my body or whatever, as lame as that sounds. Even though I’ve been vegan before, I’ve never been completely whole foods vegan before without any processed ingredients. (I’ve always loved my nondairy milks and coffee creamers, cereals, boxed crackers, my Violife cheeses, my tofu and flavored sparkling water and all that fun stuff.) Now, I suddenly see why some people out there are so strict about avoiding processed foods. It really does make you feel better!

    All of which makes me feel Vegan Mith gaining strength again. Gaining life, like Mariah Carey as November draws to a close.

    4. Catholicism, Kids, and Carnivores

    But, being Vegan Mith kind of puts me at odds with my religious community. Traditional Catholics are meat eaters. They’re homesteaders and “live off the land” farmers who raise and slaughter their own meat. I don’t think I could ever do that — I may not be an “animal lover” per se, I’m a bit too indoorsy for that, but I do hate to see animals suffering, and am kind of a softie about it. TradCaths are conservatives and old-fashioned types. In the TradCath world, eating organic, home-grown meat is the healthiest thing for your body. (It’s frustrating how nutrition advice is so different depending on whom you ask; I’ve seriously started to believe that everyone’s body is just different, and nutrition science is not universal.) In the TradCath world, vegetarianism/veganism is for liberals and prissies and hippies and government pawns.

    And, you know what? I get it. I can see where they’re coming from. I’m no longer a Peter Singer stan; I do believe that humans are superior to animals (2011 Mith would think I’m a speciesist loser, lol), and that we have dominion over animals. And I do think it seems to check out that raising your own livestock on your own land and slaughtering them yourselves seems like a wholesome and healthy way to live. I’m sure all that protein is great for you. Logically, that sounds perfectly good to me. Which is why I’m no longer the kind of vegan who thinks all carnivores are ignorant, self-deceiving liars. I can see how, philosophically, meat-eating is not only permissible but even good, as long as you’re doing so as ethically as you can.

    The other thing that’s changed my POV on carnivores is raising kids. I’m a mom of four kids five and under. And up until this year, I’ve raised my kids vegetarian. But recently I’ve softened their vegetarianism, and feed them meat sometimes; why?

    A couple of reasons: (1), my husband is a meat eater, and if I make food that he likes, but the kids can’t eat it, that means I need to make two dinners. I’ve tried for years only cooking vegetarian, but my husband was never really satisfied, and always ended up sneaking out for fast food, so we ended up just spending more money on food than we should have been spending, and it was frustrating. I’m done trying to convert my husband to vegetarianism. I’ve decided to just accept that he is who he is, with food, and tbh it’s kind of a beautiful thing that he doesn’t overthink about it so much, like I do.

    And (2), trying to manage four kids is hard. Together, they act like little dervishes, much of the time: a noisy little stampede of small humans, rampaging around my house. It’s incredibly difficult at church. It’s generally true that kids are calmer and better behaved when their bellies are full. And protein does fill you up faster. If I can get my kids to eat a bit of turkey or ham and actually fill up and simmer down and be satisfied, that’s better for all of us than just constant carb and cheese snacks around the clock. They’re so picky that, at this point, I’ll just feed them whatever I can to try and get them to fill up on something that’s not sugar.

    However, if I decide to let Vegan Mith out of her cage, and let myself live by vegan principles again… guess I’ll have to figure something else out. Apparently I can choose to have convictions or not to have them. Which leads me to ask myself sometimes: am I even a real person?

    5. In Conclusion

    All of this to say, it’s a complicated issue; for me, anyway. I could happily be a militant angry vegan, if my circumstances allowed; I could happily be carnivore, if I didn’t mind the way meat made me feel physically. Which perhaps says more about me than it does about the issue. I guess I’m just a flake.

    I welcome your comments on any of this, so please do chime in if you have strong feelings or any kind of reaction to this whole issue.

  • Holiday Baking Championship Season 12 Final: Mith Reacts

    December 24th, 2025

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for this episode of HBC!

    This finale… you know, tbh, this really kind of taught me something about myself.

    My whole life, I’ve scoffed and shaken my head at sports fanatics, the types who get so pumped about Their Team, who take it so personally, and become seriously down and depressed if Their Team plays a bad game. I’ve always looked at people like this and chuckled and thought to myself: “lol why? It’s literally just a sports game?” But then… but then! I took a look at myself watching the Season Twelve Finale of Holiday Baking Championship, and I was humbled. I get it now. I am no better than those die-hard football fans. This was personal. I needed Charles to win.

    As I’ve mentioned time and again: Charles, in addition to being just a really cool and fun-to-watch contestant, is from my hometown. Like, one of my high school friends had a part-time job at the country club where Charles is executive pastry chef. So that’s like, what, four degrees of separation, between me and Charles. I practically know him. I’ve never seen another contestant on one of these shows from my hometown. So obviously I’ve been rooting for him since day one, with more enthusiasm than I’ve ever rooted for a baking show contestant in any show.

    And it was so important to me that he win this. I really needed this, this year. It’s not been the best December ever, for me. One of my closest friends unexpectedly died last week (one of exactly two that I had), so I’ve been really down about that. And there’s been financial stress, on top of the stress of being mom to four little kids and trying to make ~Magical Christmas Memories~ happen for them on a tight budget while grieving and just managing normal life stuff, like keeping everyone fed and clean, which is already a freaking challenge in itself even without the holidays and the grief.

    It’s been a lot of little stupid things, too. Like, since we moved into this house six years ago, I’ve been wanting to put Christmas lights up outside, but we were having an issue with the outdoor electrical, and it’s just never happened; and this year, we got the electrical figured out and we were finally going to do it – we got a late start, with all the money stress, but we did it, we bought the lights, and my husband hung them up carefully, following all the instructions on the little Command hook thingies, and they were up, and it was going to look so great… but then, at the very first rainfall, the Command hooks failed and the strings of lights just straight up fell off the house. Just lying there in the dirt in the rain. Which was pretty depressing.

    It’s been a lot of things like that. So, I just really, really wanted and needed Charles to win this episode.

    And, thank God!! My champion won! Finally, some good news.

    Man, the tension! I couldn’t even watch, at the end, when they were about to call the winner. I was so sure they were going to give it to Ashleigh. I was squeezing my eyes shut, bracing myself. It just felt like they’d been building up to this. And often, on this show, they seem to prioritize narrative over accurate judging, which drives me insane.

    But not this season! Thank God! I keep saying that over and over, lol perhaps I’m being dramatic, but this win really meant a lot to me. THANK GOD!

    Charles killed it. All season, just killed it. He’s seriously one of the coolest contestants that’s ever been on one of these championships. As I pointed out in my post about the season premiere, the thing about Charles is, he’s so delightfully, quintessentially a C-Villian (right down to the name, Charles, I mean come on!). Our hometown, which I both love and love to make fun of, is a beautiful, wealthy, historic Southern college city: very smart, snooty, elitist, arrogant, liberal, BMW-driving, Whole Foods, organic, crunchy, Fine Arts, highbrow, and “cultured,” but also just a little weird, in places. Not that weird, but just a little… eccentric. And I feel like Charles as a character kind of embodies the whole essence of that city. He’s just so charming, so classy, so witty and put-together. In the early episodes, they really played up his arrogance and made him seem unapproachable, but as the season’s gone on, they’ve shown more of his warm, “human” side. I mean, he even said this episode that he was going to miss his fellow bakers, and stay in touch with them going forward! AWW. Stop. I love to see it.

    His desserts have been next-level this whole season. Haven’t they? Honestly, it wasn’t until tonight that we saw him have a technical failure of any kind – when that peppermint brownie stuck to the pan – but even that, he came back from, wisely using that buttercream around the edges to hide any trace of damage. The only evidence that something went wrong was that apparently the ganache was unevenly distributed across the top.

    Speaking of that, I noticed in both the first two challenges that Nancy and Kardea disagreed about Charles’s desserts. Nancy liked his black licorice tart, but Kardea complained about it. Then, Nancy loved his peppermint hot cocoa brownie, but Kardea complained that she got too much ganache (which, come on, is that really a problem, lol? I dunno about you guys, but my fat ass could house a whole bowl of straight ganache). I was starting to wonder if Kardea had some kind of beef with Charles – but then, in the last challenge, she defended him when Zac was whining about the ribbons on his cake. Which, I’m glad she did! That was such a minor imperfection, and, as Kardea pointed out, it was only even mentionable because the rest of Charles’s creation was so perfect that it made even the most minor imperfection evident.

    I do like Zac as a judge, though. What do you guys think? I wish Duff could have been there (is he okay?! I follow him on IG, and he just posted something for Hannukah today, so I know he’s alive – hopefully it was just a temporary illness or something!), but, if someone has to replace him on this finale, I’m glad it was Zac. “If you say ‘naughty elf’ three times, I appear,” lol that was spot on.

    There was a lot going on in this episode, whew. The first challenge, the contestants had the opportunity to bid on the choice of ingredients by cutting time off their bake – and Charles was the only one ballsy enough to actually bid a substantial chunk of his time! Twenty whole minutes – and he still managed to produce an immaculate-looking dessert, décor and all. Licorice was a bold choice. Almost no one likes that shit, haha. It looked beautiful though. I was surprised by Charles’s other choices, though – I really thought he’d give sauerkraut to his archnemesis, Ashleigh, but instead he gave her the one that I think was the easiest to work with: avocado. And he gave red curry paste to Chase, which, Chase is so good with flavors, I already knew he was going to produce something incredible with that curry paste. (I’m not personally big on the spicy + chocolate combo, but his red curry chocolate mousse cake sounded kind of awesome.)

    Poor little Tarek! Once again, coming in just shy of the win. I know he’s probably annoyed about that. But, he did really well. He had a little attitude on him today! Like when Charles entered into the first challenge twenty minutes after everyone else, coolly saying I’m not behind as he was getting started, and Tarek echoes “iM nOt bEhiNd”, lol! And then, with the butt! “Hi, my name’s Tarek and I’m five years old, and I made a butt.” I only wish that his “butt” had been more successful, because, I dunno, maybe I’m five years old as well, but that was hilarious. My husband was saying that he should have gone all in and made butts for the second and third challenges, too.

    I was sad to see Nico eliminated though. Especially after all that emotional build-up in the first half of this episode. How dare they include all that and then eliminate him! Ugh. A bit too much emotion for me, there. I was a bit overloaded and uncomfortable. And also, wtf, why did they eliminate him for those hot cocoa tiramisus? Those looked incredible! They were stunning! With the little white chocolate cups, am I right? Literally the judges’ only issue with him was not enough chocolate?! I was seriously confused why they eliminated Nico instead of Tarek here. Tarek’s pots de crème sounded seriously good (mmm, bowl of ganache), but were much less ambitious and festive than Nico’s. I don’t really understand this judgment call.

    I would have been happy if Nico had won. He was a close second favorite, for me, after Charles. He’s just been a joy to watch – what an adorable and lovely little person. I wish he’d been in the final challenge. But, at least he made it this far. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

    And, the important thing was that Charles won. Thank God. That was the only thing I wanted for Christmas.

    Readers, what did we think?! Was this the best finale or what? What an absolute cluster of a season, but it ended well. How are we feeling about it? Leave me a comment. Because, I lied, Charles winning was not the only thing I want for Christmas; I also want your comments.

    Can’t forget the final stats:

    Superlatives from the judges: 1, Kardea to Charles. Season Total: 9

    Judge says “remember, you’re on Holiday Baking Championship”: 1, Nancy to Nico. Season Total: 2

    Nancy says “bite of food”: 2.5 plus Kardea also said it once, so a season total of three times plus two half times plus a bonus from Kardea.

    High point: OBVIOUSLY CHARLES WINNING!

    Low point: I COULD HAVE USED ABOUT 5-10 MORE MINUTES OF CHARLES GLOATING AND CELEBRATING.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: A lot of good ones this episode, but, it’s gotta be Ashleigh’s Chocolate Cannoli Cake in the final challenge. The goat cheese addition to the cream cheese filling sounded amazing.

  • For J., on the day of his funeral

    December 19th, 2025
    Daily writing prompt
    Describe a man who has positively impacted your life.
    View all responses

    “My prayer is that when I die, all of hell rejoices that I am out of the fight.” – C.S. Lewis

    The term “old soul” gets thrown around a lot, and mostly in a lame kind of way – to describe kids who are simply smarter or more intuitive than their peers, or who are just quiet because they’re afraid of getting in trouble. I think “old soul” is a cliché, most of the time, and a pretty weak descriptor. But even a stopped clock is right twice a day, and, like most clichés, “old soul” can, at rare times, describe a person pretty accurately. IMO, it’s never described anyone as accurately as it described my friend, whom for the sake of online anonymity I will herein refer to simply as J.

    Which is, of course, another cliché: everyone always gushes about how “special” their loved one was, after that loved one dies. I guess most people really are that special, when you get to know them well enough. And I guess I am biased, and J himself would certainly disagree, but I personally believe that J was actually especially special.

    .

    J, I keep reflecting on how it came to pass that God chose to take you at this time of year: on December 15th. You were just telling me how December is always the hardest time of year for you. That it makes you feel spiritually vulnerable. I guess it is a hard season for single people in general, plus you just had your birthday, which is probably an unwelcome reminder of how time keeps passing and you are still stuck, still waiting, still not living the life you feel so called to. You told me it felt like you’ve just been sitting around waiting for the last several years.

    You said that around this time of year is when, more than usual, you seek comfort in the prayers and spirituality of the Eastern rite. Even after you decided against converting to Orthodoxy, you maintained a special affinity for the Byzantine approach to the Faith, and identified as “bi-ritual” – or even tri-ritual, really, since you were equally devoted to the Anglican Ordinariate. Latin, English, or Eastern: you knew each of these traditions so well, and could talk about them at great length, with great love, and felt so called to live in each of them. You could have been perfectly at home in any of the three. You could have done so many things. Your life could have been so many things.

    I’ve never met such an old soul, and I’ve never met a soul so awake and alive to its potential, so driven to respond to God’s call, yet so held back by its physical circumstances.

    .

    Where to begin? He’s always been so far beyond me – imo, beyond most people – in many ways, though I never saw him act like he thought so. I’ve often wondered why someone so intelligent and wise would want to be friends with me at all. J never thought himself above anyone, though. I will try now to recount the story of our friendship.

    I first met J in early 2012, nearly fourteen years ago, in a coffee shop in the city where we were both students at different schools. Weary of my depraved atheist lifestyle, I was beginning to inquire into the Catholic faith, and a kind priest had recommended that I connect with the local Catholic campus ministry group, which served students of several different colleges in that city. When I walked into the coffee shop to meet up with the group’s leader, she had three other students at the table with her, who I guess were interested in meeting and welcoming me, the newcomer: two girls and one guy. The guy was J.

    I don’t remember the details of that first meeting; I just remember my general impressions. Immediately upon meeting him, I could tell that J was the Really Smart one of the group: an intellectual, an academic, a reader, an old-fashioned sort of English gentleman type you’d expect to meet on the campus of Oxford or Cambridge a hundred years ago, weraring a tweed coat and smoking a pipe; but, interestingly, in the form of an unassuming, small-town country guy who liked guns and watching football and spoke in an endearing Deep Southern drawl. He was an intensely serious individual, you could tell, even while he was good at joking around and casual, lighthearted banter; he was no intellectual snob. He was an introvert who, when in comfortable company or in conversation about something important to him, became eloquent and verbose. And when he talked, what struck me the most about him was how devout he was. “Zealous” is the word that comes to mind (and indeed, I’ve sometimes heard him describe himself that way; “zeal for Your house has consumed me” was very true of him). At that time, when I was still a liberal atheist just dipping my toes in the world of Christianity, it was kind of intimidating.

    Because I wanted the comfort of being Christian – but, back then, I didn’t want to be some out-there “extremist” who lived like it was another time. Surely it wasn’t necessary to take it that far! I just wanted to feel better, I guess, without sacrificing too much freedom. I thought I wanted to convert, but in truth I wasn’t yet ready to surrender my own opinions and feelings yet. I was a stupid college kid who honestly didn’t know what I wanted.

    J saw that. He tried to help me. He was a friend and mentor figure to me, in those days. We were both writers, he in a much more real way than me – he was a serious poet, playwright, novelist, and essayist, whereas I, even though I didn’t want to admit it then, simply liked to dabble in silly little stories for my own personal kicks. But we both liked talking philosophy, theory, abstracts – I remember one lengthy phone conversation about whether there are aliens in heaven. Like me, he was a convert to Catholicism. And he knew so much about the Faith. Patiently, he tried to talk me through all of the little hang-ups that I had with Church teaching at the time. He even tried to introduce me to Tradition and the Tridentine Latin Mass, to which he was devoted – but I was just not ready to hear it yet. I was stubbornly committed to my liberalism, and I think that kind of drove us apart.

    Later, after we reconnected, he told me how deeply he regretted “overloading me with information” and “pressuring” me to see the Truth; he thought he’d scared me off. When in truth I was just a flake and a serial ghoster who feared any kind of closeness, and didn’t know how to keep a friend. I don’t remember the last time we talked or any details of how we fell apart. But for years, afterward, I felt so guilty and full of regret about how I’d acted, because he was such a special person and we’d had such a rare friendship. I’d expected that he’d never want to hear from me again, because of what an idiot I was back then; but he had no bitterness whatsoever. He blamed only himself. That was typical of him. He always took responsibility for his own feelings.

    This reconnection took place in 2022, ten years after our initial friendship. By this point we were living four hundred and sixty-eight miles apart. I think he re-added me on Facebook, which encouraged me to send a “how’s it going?, it’s been a while”-type message, after which we exchanged messages for a few weeks or so. But I got the sense that he was really down, and pretty soon after, we fell silent again; I guess I figured he was probably still mad at me, which was fair.

    Although I do remember late one night he sent a brief, garbled message that he was headed to the hospital, very sick, and wanted to let me know, in case he didn’t make it, that he was glad he’d met me. Luckily he pulled through. But still we didn’t talk much for a while.

    It wasn’t until early 2024 that we reconnected in a meaningful way. He randomly messaged one spring day to wish me a Happy Latin Easter, mentioning that he was now converting to Orthodoxy so no longer following the same liturgical calendar that I was, but that he’d seen that it was Easter for Catholics and wanted to wish me a happy one. He sounded much more cheerful than he had a couple years prior. I was fascinated and alarmed to hear that he, the most devout Catholic I’d ever known, was converting away from Catholicism; especially because this was at a time when I was at a crossroads in my own faith, trying to figure out whether to switch from a mainstream Catholic parish to a more niche, Traditional one (a branch that’s frowned upon by most in the mainstream Church, hence the difficult decision).

    Because – backstory time – over the years, I’d finally started to take my religion more seriously. Having children had that effect on me. From the time when my first was born in 2020, I wanted to be better, do better, and pass on the true Faith. However, I had no Catholics around me yet, no Catholic family members nor friends, at that time. And it’s hard to practice a religion in isolation. Over the years I’d thought frequently about J, sorely wishing that I hadn’t screwed up that friendship so that I could pick his brain, get his guidance, listen to him share his wisdom again. I felt this especially strongly in early 2024, as I was trying to figure out whether to change churches. Serendipitously, it was around this time that I got that out-of-the-blue Easter message.

    And from that point on, until just a week ago, he and I talked pretty much daily, making up for lost time. We exchanged long messsages. First they were mostly about faith: he was very serious about Orthodoxy, and I was still decidedly Catholic but just wasn’t sure which flavor of Catholic to be, so we were both just bouncing all kinds of ideas off of each other. He introduced me to some really cool Orthodox saints, iconography, prayers, and, best of all, music – Orthodox chant is unrivalled! Even though he wasn’t practicing Catholicism, he still knew more about it than I did, and helped me work through my decision to try becoming Trad. So we were mostly talking Church stuff. But at the same time we were chatting a bit about our daily lives, and gradually opening up about what had been going on with us since we’d known each other in college.

    Apparently he’d had a rough go of it (which was why he’d sounded so down in ‘22). His health had really suffered; he’d nearly died, at one point; he’d become disabled, his mobility was now seriously limited, he was living with chronic pain, could barely use his hands, and had had no choice but to quit working and move back home. Which felt awful for him – he was independent by nature, never wanted to feel like a freeloader. Circumstances had taken a toll on his mental health, understandably. He’d been depressed, and even strayed from the Faith for some time. Delving into Orthodoxy helped him repair his relationship with God and gave him, for the first time in a number of years, hope and motivation.

    It’s weird: all this time, we never saw each other in person, nor ever even spoke on the phone. Our friendship was now entirely in writing, and stayed that way. At times we’d discuss me bringing my family down that way for a vacation to the city where we met (which is closer to his home than mine), so we could all meet up. But whenever we discussed stuff like that, I got the feeling he wanted to wait to be seen until he was well again. He mentioned that he needed multiple surgeries to get himself back in working order; his whole future was dependent upon these surgeries that he was waiting for, and whether they’d be successful. I think he felt somewhat embarrassed about the condition of his body.

    But it was okay. We’re both writers, after all, and very introverted, and I think we both felt more able to open up in that medium.

    I was thrilled when his extensive historical research and earnest, persistent prayers led him to return to Catholicism in late 2024, around the same time I finally committed to the Traditional church. So now we were both Trad Catholics together. And being able to share that with him as a friend has been one of the great joys of my life, and brought me immense spiritual benefit.

    He became my new son’s godfather. He mentioned more than once that my kids and I felt like family to him. We often talked about one day in the future, after his surgeries and recovery, all of us living as neighbors, perhaps on adjoining plots of land – he was a great believer in the importance of self-sufficiency and farming: a proponent of the Catholic Land Movement, he had great plans for a homestead, was seriously considering going into agribusiness as a career once he was better, already taking courses for it online, even. So we talked a lot about the future, when he was well again, all the things that he would be able to do, the trips he wanted to take, all the cool stuff we’d be able to do together, my family and his.

    Because that was the other thing he wanted more than anything: a family. Even since before I met him, he’d always felt called to the vocation of marriage – so strongly that he passed up the chance to enter a monastery or a seminary, even though he’d considered those, and would have made a great monk or priest. But, he never had luck in relationships. And his health issues towards the end of his life prohibited him from pursuing that. Still, he didn’t give up – courageously putting himself out there to the extent that he could, meeting a few women online here and there, but, understandably I guess, no women were willing to wait around for these future surgeries and recovery to happen before they could start a life together. I always hoped that, once he was mobile again, he’d be able to get out and visit some of the different parishes he was hoping to attend – he was excited about Byzantine, TLM, and Anglican Ordinariate Catholic churches located in a city a couple hours’ drive from his small hometown – and that there he might meet his future wife IRL. But for that, he’d have to be able to drive, for which he’d need his mobility back, and money to afford a car, for which he’d need a job…

    Everything, for him, was hanging on these surgeries. He’d been waiting, waiting, waiting for them for years. The insurance situation was complicated, and he was waiting to be approved for disability benefits – government nonsense that takes a ridiculously long time, I guess. It killed me that someone so deserving, so eager to get back to work and pull his own weight in society, had such a hard time getting approved. It feels unfair, that people with a ton of money can just afford to get healthcare when they need it. How I longed to throw money at his problems for him, money that neither of us had.

    The surgeries never happened. At the end, he was still waiting – still trying to hold onto hope.

    Even though it was getting hard. December was a hard time of year, and he had just turned thirty-eight. Some of his recent messages to me were rather clipped in tone and colored with despair. He mentioned that he was finding it hard to stay hopeful about the future. The depression was creeping back in. He even felt that he was under spiritual attack.


    But he was fighting it. He was trying harder than ever to trust totally in God, which was always one of the most challenging aspects of the Faith, for him, as he was such an independent person who liked to get things done himself. He was living like a religious hermit, in those last days, praying all hours of the night and day, sincerely lamenting all his sins.

    He took comfort in Byzantine prayers and chants, which, he told me, felt somehow “warmer” to him than Latin rite prayers – he once said that he felt maybe he was just meant to be Eastern. But the only Catholic church close to him was a regular Novus Ordo parish, and he’d been attending there whenever he could get a ride; he’d made a good connection with the local priest. On December 8th, the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, he messaged me in the afternoon, in good spirits, wishing me a happy Feast Day and sharing that he’d been able to make it to Mass, even though he wasn’t feeling well at all during it, and that, afterwards, he’d gotten a chance to go to Confession. This Sacrament had greatly relieved some of his spiritual burden; it was, he said, almost like he could physically see and feel the malicious spirit’s grip on him being released. In his last full-length message to me, he sounded like he was feeling better about things.

    Until the end of my life, it will be a great comfort to me that he made it to Confession that day, on that Marian feast day, just one week before he was to die.

    .

    Some people might have thought he was crazy for some of the things he said and believed. The supernatural was very real and immediate, for J. He had seen things, and experienced things, that science can’t explain. Even though I myself have never had a “supernatural” experience, per se, and I’ve never seen a ghost or a cyptid or anything like that, listening to him talk about these things made me believe in them, too. I won’t go into too much detail because some of these things were very personal to him, and it’d feel like a betrayal, and you might even laugh. Because I can’t write as convincingly as he did. Suffice it to say that his spirituality and worldview leaned very mystical and irrational (“irrational” here meaning neither “stupid” nor “silly,” but in the psychology sense of “not explainable with logic” or “not necessarily following a strict logical order”). Which is perhaps why Orthodoxy appealed to him so much; more than the Latin world, Eastern theology leans into the mysterious and unknowable. I know some people thought he was a little out-there, for believing in such things, but the truth is, God favored him with these experiences, these glimpses into the extraordinary, for whatever reason; IMO, the reason being that he was an extraordinary person.

    .

    J, as I write this, it’s the day before your funeral, and it kills me that I cannot go. Your godson is five months old and exclusively breastfeeding – I’ve tried to introduce a bottle before, and he won’t take it – so I’d have to bring him with me, lest he starve. My husband could probably manage to get tomorrow off work, but not Saturday, so I’d have to leave after he gets off work tonight, drive overnight with the baby, then drive back tomorrow immediately after your burial in order to be back by Saturday morning, which, as much as I hate to admit, sounds unhealthy and dangerous, especially in our rinky-dink little car. If only I could afford a plane ticket. If only my husband could take bereavement leave for the death of his wife’s best friend. If I could go and leave baby at home with my husband, I’d do it, 100%. I’m beating myself up telling myself that maybe I just need to chug some energy drinks and try harder to make this happen. I know it’d be unwise to go, but still, I am mad at myself. But, I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t want that.

    And it kills me that I didn’t check in Sunday or Monday. Our last messages were on Saturday, when you were still in the ICU, and I figured I’d leave you alone to rest up; you’d “liked” my last little trite, lame “hope you feel better soon”-type message; after that, I didn’t want to be imposing. I didn’t want to bother you. I figured if I hadn’t heard from you by the end of Monday I’d message you to check in. But then I logged onto Facebook on Monday evening and saw your mom’s update. Maybe I should have imposed. Did I let my social fears and neuroses ruin things again?

    The thing that kills me even more, though, even more than missing your funeral, even more than the fact that I didn’t check in, is just the intolerable, unacceptable fact that you’ll never get a chance. With your genius-level intellect, your deep, profound, sincere faith, against all odds, and your commitment to living it, your passionate pursuit of your interests, your genuine humility, your kindness and good sense of humor – there are just so many things you could have done. Like I was saying just last week (I had to check again: message timestamped December 10th at 10pm: really, just last week?!), when you’d been feeling miserable and considering just giving up on the future and entering a nursing home already: you mustn’t give up, there is so much left for you to do in the world!

    .

    So that was our friendship. Now I’ll tell you a bit about the person that J was, as I knew him, because I don’t want him to be forgotten.

    In the Jungian personality typology system known as socionics, there are eight elements that describe how humans metabolize information or process the world around them. J was (in my opinion, anyway – this is a pseudoscience, after all, not a hard science) an EII: Ethical Intuitive Introtim, which means that he had Ne (extraverted intuition) as his creative function, i.e. in his ego block: the ability to see connections and potential, where other, non-Ne-using people might just see randomness, was a strong, valued aspect of his psyche. Ne is the element of potential. This heightened Ne, when it goes haywire, can look a bit like ADHD (which diagnosis J did also have, and as an academic really struggled with; at the time of his death, he was still waiting to find the right prescription to get his brain back to peak function – waiting, waiting). But it’s also a strength. He had so many interests – he was never jaded about the beauty that exists in the world, he was so full of wonder! He could research topics of interest endlessly, and he retained so much information. He just knew so much about so much.

    Potential, he had so much potential. That’s what kills me. He often spoke of feeling a call to be a teacher, in some capacity – and, indeed, he was an excellent teacher. Even when he was struggling in his personal life, he was always ready to teach, to advise, to counsel a friend. In the MBTI personality system, he was INFP, the type known as “The Mediator.” He loved education, especially classical education, and he had a lot of ideas about pedagogy. I think he’d have been great as a college professor. Sadly, finances were an obstacle to making this a career. For the past year, he’d accepted that the most likely way he’d get to live this calling to teach, was going to be at home: helping with homeschooling the children that he hoped to have. His children, had he had them, would have been so blessed.

    All the things he’ll never get to do or create. He was a writer. Imagine being a writer and not able to use your hands (to type messages on his phone, he had to use a stylus, a process that was clunky and frustrating). There was a novel that he’d been working on since high school – he had written pages and pages and pages of world-building material for it. I never saw any of it, but he told me a little about it, and it sounded fascinating. He was waiting to get back into writing the book itself until he had the use of his hands and attention span, and could afford a computer to type it on. Waiting, waiting. How his circumstances held him back. Now the world will never have that book.

    I daresay I’m more bothered, emotionally, about the lost potential than he was. He accepted. As sad as he was, he accepted God’s will for him. He expressed sadness, sure, but I never heard him bemoan the unfairness of his situation the way that I’m doing right now. J had really had the opportunity to practice resignation to the will of God, over the last few years of his life, and, from my pov, he’d become quite an expert at it.

    That was the thing. He didn’t complain or blame other people. Even when his attempts at relationships failed, I never once heard him complain about those women or blame them for anything. He never turned bitter. He accepted rejection graciously, taking the blame for everything; he always spoke of these people with respect and compassion. I never knew him to be the least bit jealous: he could engage with content about the kind of life that he wished he could have, and with people who were living the life he wanted to live, without covetousness coloring his interactions. As opposed to someone like me, who, if I see content that makes me feel inadequate or like I’m falling short, I get butthurt and have to block that whole account. But J wasn’t like that. He didn’t demand things, didn’t seem to think he was entitled to anything, just stayed positive and hopeful. That, to me, speaks of real humility.

    .

    Even living with a disability, he did what he could to do good works and stand up for what he believed in. Preserving the Catholic Tradition was deeply important to him, and he longed to be more involved in the cause. But, as it was, he couldn’t go on pilgrimages or travel to a TLM parish or to convene with like-minded Catholics; so he had to do what he could at home. He joined the Militia of the Immaculata. He wrote a letter to his Bishop suggesting the Bishop invite one of the Traditional Societies to build a home in their diocese – a letter which he labored over for a long time, and allowed me to read before he sent it; it was beautiful.

    Then he wrote a document for his parish priest with a long list of concrete suggestions for how they could implement a more reverent liturgy in their church, complete with relevant citations from Vatican II and postconciliar Popes, because he wasn’t just some stubborn grouch who insisted upon no less than a complete, immediate return to pre-1968 Catholicism; to him, baby steps in the right direction were worth celebrating.

    “Zeal for Your house has consumed me.” The Church was his great love, and the brokenness within it pained him personally – especially because he saw the beauty in all of these different spiritualities, and saw that they each served a purpose in the Mystical Body of Christ. He had a great devotion to Our Lord’s Agony in the Garden, and meditated often on His sorrow there, especially His sorrow foreseeing the divisions that would fracture His Church. J longed to see these divisions healed. He was no ecumenist – he firmly believed that the Catholic Church was the True Church – but still, the polemics and vitriol that Orthodox and Catholic alike often spew at each other online, all their bickering and name-calling, always bothered him deeply. Because he knew both sides very well, and could see the Truth in both of them. I think if he is ever canonized, he will be named one of the Patron Saints of unity within the Church, kind of like St. Josaphat.

    He loved the Church, and he loved so many other things as well, not all of them serious. He loved nerdy stuff like Star Wars, fantasy and sci-fi, board games, video games; he loved his dogs, and dogs in general, especially those funny long-nosed borzois, and also bears, and sending funny memes and reels to his friends. He had a lot of thoughts about political philosophy – was neither Republican nor Democrat, but subscribed to the Catholic Distributism of G.K Chesterton, about which he could tell you way more than I can. He knew a lot about weaponry; he loved camping and the outdoors; he loved simple Southern cooking, and was proud of his down-home Southern identity, but longed to travel internationally, which he never got the chance to; and, after all this, I haven’t even touched on his love of history yet, which was perhaps his number one passion after the Faith.

    He was a historian, extremely fluent in history, and not just the history itself but the theory of history and how to study it. And saw the trends from history repeating in our present day. He knew about geopolitics, and had a lot of thoughts about what’s going on in the world right now, thoughts which were so far beyond my ability to make sense of that I sometimes couldn’t believe he bothered to talk to someone like me about them, when all I could do was smile and nod. But he loved his friends, was loyal to them, and made a concerted effort to maintain his friendships, which is rare among people of our age.

    I realize I’m rambling now. What I’m trying to say is, he was a person of great love. The world has lost a real one, an uncommon soul, a strong fighter for the good in this great cosmic battle of good vs. evil. I know that all of hell is rejoicing that he’s out of the fight.

    .

    He was suffering so much, in the weeks leading up to the Immaculate Conception. I never really knew how to reassure him, whe he was so down, because I’ve never known the degree of suffering that he knew, and he was so far beyond me spiritually and intellectually. What could I even say? But I tried to remind him of how, in the lives of the Saints, we always see progression in sanctity preceded by great suffering. So maybe that’s what God is doing with you, I said. Maybe something great is just around the corner, for you, I said, on December 7th at 8:02 PM.

    .

    An old soul: even when I first met him, I could tell it seemed like he belonged in another time. Even back then, in his twenties, he seemed older than most twentysomethings. It’s almost like it caught up with him, physiologically, being such an old soul. The health conditions that plagued him over the past few years are the kind that usually afflict much older people. And he was always mature beyond his years, emotionally and intellectually. Like I said, he seemed, in my eyes anyway, so far beyond most people. I think, especially when he was young, it was rather isolating. I think it was a lonely life, being such an old soul.

    But he took that loneliness, which IMO would have been enough to kill the average person, and let it teach him. He learned from the loneliness of the Agony of Our Lord in the Garden.

    J, forgive me for not making it to the funeral. Forgive me for not being a better friend. For not checking in more. And that it took so long for us to reconnect. I should have been more courageous, should have been more humble, should have been more like you. I ask you to forgive me, but I know you already have, but that doesn’t make it any easier, somehow.

    Requiēm aetérnam dona ei, Dómine, et lux perpétua lúceat ei. Requiéscat in pace. Amen.

  • Holiday Baking Championship Season 12 Semifinal: Mith Reacts

    December 17th, 2025

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for this episode of HBC!

    “You’re seeing none of this.” – Nico to the camera as he wrestled with handfuls of sticky, stretchy, over-gelatinized marshmallow

    “Oh my God, this is so cringey.” – Charles, head in his hands, observing the judging of said over-gelatinized marshmallow

    I was really looking forward to this week, but I feel pretty let down. Anyone else?

    This is the first time this season that I’ve really felt a judging call was bad and wrong. Charles should have won the stupid Chance Heat. I am 100% sure that this was an instance of the creators skewing the judging in order to create more drama for TV; they just really wanted to actually utilize this stupid little “Chance Heat” concept they’d come up with, to let one contestant sail through to the final. They didn’t want to let that whole idea just go to waste (even though it should have; stop messing with the structure, already, FFS!). Especially because Ashleigh’s the last female left standing and all; it certainly makes for good TV.

    But come on. Charles’s cranberry-whipped cream panna cottas were, the judges even said, “perfect.” They gushed on and on about those panna cottas. And Ashleigh’s pineapple cheesecake — it was “good,” and earned positive but sedate critiques; but then it went on to win?! Ashleigh is obviously extremely good, I’m a big fan, no hate of any kind to her; but as a viewer, her win in this challenge seemed to come out of nowhere. I am completely convinced that they just wanted to keep up this little narrative they’ve got going of “Charles is always the bridesmaid,” as well as the little saga of Ashleigh’s “redemption” after last week, because it was such an emotional thing. Very illogical, very stupid.

    I know, it’s probably silly for little old me to assert with such confidence that I “know” a judging call on a baking competition show was bad. I’m just sitting at home watching TV in my bathrobe, what do I know? I wasn’t there irl to hear the full, uncut critiques, nor did I actually taste the two cakes. And, I guess that’s a fair criticism of me. Maybe I’m just finally getting jaded about baking shows.

    Another thing that sucked this week: watching poor little Nico become genuinely stressed and unhappy. I don’t think we’ve seen him get so truly tense, upset, and joyless like this, up until this week. During the Main Heat bake we heard a fellow contestant check in on him, asking if he was okay, and he just goes: “No.” Ugh, it was such a downer. I felt so bad for him: first that marshmallow disaster, and then getting stuck with an ingredient that he straight up hates for the Main Heat challenge. Always, on these shows, whenever a contestant is forced to bake with an ingredient that they hate, it never goes well (just look at poor Tarek with gelatin in this week’s Chance Heat! The flavors sounded delightful, but what a technical disaster!). And then, the judges’ critique of Nico’s dessert was so stupid! The pudding flavor got lost beneath the hazelnut?! Yeah, I should hope so! What, did you want Nico to just let his cake taste like grainy artificial chocolate, to really let that pudding mix “shine”?! Would they have been happier if he’d made a shitty-tasting dessert? Stupid, stupid, stupid. Majorly disappointed.

    And poor Jean Carlos. I don’t think his elimination was undeserved, but it was still sad to watch. When he said that his coconut cake was dedicated to his mom, and started talking about how he wanted to win for his mom, my husband was like: “he’s doomed.” And he kept saying this week how badly he wanted to win, to be the first Brazilian winner. He seemed like such a sweet, kind soul, the kind of positive, resilient person who refuses to blame others or be a victim of their difficult past. The way he reacted when his name was called at the end, just hanging his head for a moment, was almost too sad for me.

    So what were some good things this week? I’ll try and name a few:

    – It’s nice to have the “team” business over with. Every baker for himself, as it should be.

    – I missed Duff, but Stephanie was a good guest judge. She was eloquent, funny, and positive, but also kept it very real.

    – Nancy’s necklace this week was fabulous. The retro looks for the judges were all cute, but I couldn’t stop ogling that oversized string of pink pearls. I’m not much of a jewelry wearer anymore, now that I have kids, but I’ve always kinda loved big chunky beads like this.

    – The Charles/Ashleigh rivalry is going strong, obviously. It was a highlight this week. Even though I’m disappointed with how things played out, it is certainly thrilling to witness the tension between these two, as well as Chase. No offense to Tarek, Nico, or Jean Carlos, but it’s pretty evident by now that those three are in a league of their own.

    – Little Tarek did a beautiful job in the Main Heat. That white cake with spiced peach filling was gorgeous inside and out; I loved the sort of minimalist, elegant Christmas trees and holly on his all-white cake. And he was so humble about it, too – you could see at the end that he sincerely could not believe he had beaten Charles. Kardea was right, that he was really showing here that he deserves to be in the final. I kinda feel like Tarek’s been hit-and-miss for most of the competition, and at times I’ve wondered “how is he still here?”, but apparently, when he’s at his best, he’s really, really good.

    – Speaking of Kardea, I feel like she really stepped up in Duff’s absence. Her critiques this week seemed more authoritative – like she took it upon herself to be a little more, well, “judgy,” to perhaps compensate for smartass Duff not being there – but without sacrificing any of her characteristic sweetness and warmth. She still managed to be just as compassionate as ever, even while taking on a bit more of a boss role. Did you notice this subtle difference as well? I’m a huge fan of hers, so I loved to see it.

    But, I’m still confused. They have five finalists? How are they going to do next week? Are they going to do another three-challenge format and eliminate a baker after each of the two first challenges? That’s my prediction. I’ve never seen them go into a final challenge with more than three bakers. But this season’s been such a hot mess, format-wise, that I guess anything could happen. Let me know your thoughts.

    Superlatives from the judges: 3: Kardea to Jean Carlos, Nancy to Ashleigh, and Kardea to Charles (running total: 8)

    Judge says “remember, you’re on Holiday Baking Championship”: 0 (running total: still only 1?!)

    Nancy says “bite of food”: 1 (running total: 1-½)

    High point: “That’s the sound of Christmas,” Charles snarled irritably at the cameras as he drummed and rattled the molds of his white chocolate hemispheres against the steel countertop, trying to get the things to come out. Best lol I’ve had this week.

    Low point: Bad call from the judges about the Chance Heat. I demand justice for Charles.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Ashleigh’s German Chocolate cake with salted ganache. No notes, as guest judge Stephanie commented; it looked like a flawless cake, and embodied pretty much everything anyone could ever want in a cake.

  • Is it okay for Catholics to do “Santa Claus”?

    December 14th, 2025

    Tis the season!, the season for me, an American Catholic convert and mom of littles, to once again lose sleep over the ethics of Santa Claus.

    Here is the situation, in case you’re not familiar: a great many American Catholic parents, especially the more Traditional ones, are eschewing the annual practice of “Santa Claus.” They don’t tell their kids the story that Santa Claus is a jolly fat guy in a red suit who lives at the North Pole with a bunch of elves and, once a year on Christmas Eve night, hops in a sleigh pulled by flying reindeer and delivers presents to boys and girls all around the world, parking on the roof and sliding down the chimney. They just teach their children from the get-go that Santa is just some dumb/silly made-up story, and that Christmas presents come from Mom and Dad.

    Why do these parents eschew Santa? As far as I can gather, they do so for two main reasons: (1) to emphasize the real meaning of Christmas, i.e. the Birth of Christ, and not a commercialist orgy of spending and gift-getting; and/or (2) because they see that it’s unethical to lie to their children. Indeed, I’ve even seen claims from Santa-haters that they themselves felt “betrayed” and “traumatized” when they, as children, found out that Santa was not real and their parents had been deceiving them all along.

    I will address these in order.

    But first, a sliver of my personal background, so you can see where I’m coming from. I was not raised in a Christian household. My family home was happy and loving, but decidedly secular. Did Santa come to my house? You bet he did! It was magical – it was some of the happiest memories of my life, the whole Christmas season, everything about it. I’ve always loved Christmas.

    When did I find out that Santa wasn’t real?: It happened organically. No one ever told me; there was no light bulb moment. I grew up and gradually made sense of what was really going on, and realized that, on some level, I had kind of known it all along. Was I sad? No. By the time I was old enough to accept that Santa was a story, I was old enough to not feel sad about it.

    Did my parents lie to me? Did I feel betrayed?: No, and absolutely not! Not to invalidate anyone’s trauma, but I do think this is a kind of silly thing to call “betrayal.” (Feel free to debate me on this, though.) I do not really agree that doing Santa is “dishonest,” and here’s why:

    There is a difference between telling a story/playing a game, and telling a lie. The former means: play, enchantment, creating magical childhood memories, levity, all in fun, with the intention of spreading joy. The latter is not about magic or innocent fun, but deliberate deception for some self-centered reason. Maybe the difference is too subtle for some of these mad trads to grapple with, or maybe they just haven’t thought too hard about it.

    One example I like to use is this thing my MIL used to do for my husband when he was a little boy. She’d collect dollhouse furniture, and surreptitiously set it up in cute little arrangements in nooks and crannies around their house and yard, which my husband would then discover with delight, and she would tell him it was the fairies’ home. As a forty-year-old man, he still talks about this and how cool it was for him, as a kid, and he credits his Mom’s creativity for fostering his passion for fantasy and storytelling. Was my MIL lying to him? Was my husband betrayed and traumatized when he grew into the knowledge that the fairies weren’t real? Of course not!

    To be fair, I guess you could argue that it can’t be called just a “story” or a “game” if one party doesn’t know that it’s a story or a game. Is it really a fair game if it’s one-sided? So maybe therein lies these Trad parents’ beef with Santa.

    We should consider, though, the precious innocence of childhood: for young children, magic is entirely possible; the distinction between real and story is less clear. And while this absolutely doesn’t mean we should take advantage and deceive them, because they are people and have dignity, it does give parents a unique opprtunity to create magic for their kids through things like play, games, and stories. (Remember the movie Pan’s Labyrinth?) A child’s innocence is a beautiful thing. They are able to believe in fantastical things. Why not let magic be real for as long as it can, as long as it’s presented in a harmless and loving way?

    “But is any lie ever harmless?,” you may be asking. Good question. This is an interesting point, and it is one that I keep in mind when doing Santa with my kids.

    How can I make “Santa” distinct from straight-up deception? How can I ensure that I’m not just lying to my kids? Here’s my personal take:

    – Whenever I speak of Santa Claus, I do so with levity, in a playful way. I don’t try to explain the logistics realistically, in literal terms, nor do I make serious threats about Santa bringing coal instead of presents or whatever.

    – I try to remember to always preface claims about Santa with “According to legend, …” or “As the story goes…”

    – If my child asks questions about the details of how Santa functions, my response is something like: “What do you think?” “That’s just what the story says.” “How do you think that works?”

    – I’ll even tell them things like “the legend of Santa Claus arose from the real Saint Nicholas…”, i.e. sneaking in little admissions that it’s a legend without explicitly saying so.

    “But still,” you may be arguing: “even if you can manage to keep it a harmless game, all this Santa Claus nonsense detracts from the real point of Christmas!”

    Another fair point, and one that I make a concerted effort to address. The first two-thirds of my life I had no religion, and the first five-sixths of my life I had no children, so this whole “Catholic Christmas with Kids” thing is pretty new to me, and doesn’t come naturally.

    How can I incoroprate “Santa” into a proper Traditional Catholic celebration of Christmas?

    – Santa Claus and Saint Nicholas are the same person, in our house. I’ve taught my kids how the two names are synonymous: “Santa” = “Saint” and “Claus” = short for Nicholas. As we see it, he stops by on his feast day to leave a few goodies in the shoes, then comes back again with more gifts on Jesus’ birthday (which is obviously the more important day, for him, because as a Saint he loves Jesus very much!).

    – When my kids start asking questions like “so does St. Nicholas come down from heaven?”, “I thought he lived at the North Pole?”, “Does he really have elves?”, I just respond with “I don’t know; that’s just how the legend goes,” et cetera.

    – I have explained also that, while some people draw Santa as fat and silly, that’s probably not what he actually looked like.

    – Gifts are secondary to the religious celebration. I try to remind them of this constantly by: going to Mass before we open presents, discussing the reason why we give presents on Christmas, and giving mostly religious-themed gifts.

    – We also observe Advent and the full Christmas season, leaving decorations up and continuing to listen to Christmas music and do Christmas activities all the way through the twelve days.

    “That’s all well and good, Mith,” you may be saying; “but why not just do away with Santa entirely? Wouldn’t that make it easier to keep the focus on Christ?”

    Well, maybe in some ways it would. Why incorporate Santa? Well, I guess simply because, it’s fun! It’s magical! It brings us joy! And furthermore, we’re Americans, and Santa is an American thing. He’s part of our culture.

    “SMFH. Your poor kids are going to be so confused,” you might be saying. I hope not! I admit, I do worry about this, because I’m the only person I know who does things this way, and I’m a bit insecure about it. But I hope that, if I keep being tactful and lighthearted about Santa Claus in the ways I’ve described, my kids will naturally make sense on their own, in time, of the fact that the flying reindeer and the “coming down the chimney with a sack of toys” stuff is just a legend.

    And besides, one small beef that I have with the Anti-Santa Trads: why is it that y’all say it’s a “lie” and “unethical” to tell your kids Santa brings presents on Christmas – but it’s okay to play such games when it’s Saint Nicholas “bringing presents” on Saint Nicholas Day? I get the feeling that a lot of these Trads just resent Santa because he’s a popular, mainstream thing of secular American origin. Like they’re trying to be all hipster about it, refusing to like something that other, less-cool people also like. To which I would respond: come on now, it’s okay to like things. We needn’t take ourselves so seriously. Should I also refuse to wear socks because secular people wear socks? Should I refuse to eat bananas because non-Catholics grow and sell them?

    “But Mith, it’s different,” you might argue. “Santa is a commercialist distortion of a real Christian Saint. Socks and bananas are neutral.” I actually would argue that Santa is also neutral. His holiness or baseness depends upon how you choose to implement him in your house.

    And as I was saying above, one other thing we American Catholics have to consider is: we are American. (If your family’s immigrated to the US relatively recently, I’m not talking to you; I’m addressing those of us whose families have been American for many generations.)

    America is not a Catholic country. (It’s arguably kind of an anti-Catholic country, if you look at its history and founding principles, but that’s another story.) Other countries around the world have all kinds of unique and beautiful Christmas traditions specific to their cultures. America’s holiday traditions are all vaguely Protestant in flavor, but mostly secular/commercial. Like, spinoffs of spinoffs of the real thing. Any cool Catholic traditions that are practiced in the US were brought here from other places. There really is no such thing as American Catholic culture.

    So how do those of us who come from a secular, all-American background celebrate Christmas without just appropriating other cultures’ traditions? Well, I guess we could simply appropriate other culture’s traditions. But that would feel kind of forced and fake (to me, anyway, as the most boring and basic of plain white Americans). Isn’t there some way to begin to create a Christmas tradition that is authentically Catholic and authentically American? Is it possible to do both? This is the question that comes into my mind this time of year, and it’s from this question that my whole approach to Santa Claus stems.

    Because how can we create a Traditional Catholic American culture, in general? Our country is so young, and Traditional Catholics are such a minority; it’s still a work in progress. Will we do it by deliberately re-creating other countries’ traditions here in the US – basically larping as Europeans? Or, will we let our culture grow organically, by incorporating and sanctifying elements of the culture that’s already around us? I feel like the latter option is more in keeping with how tradition actually works.

    All of which is why, after much stress, angst, deliberation, and prayerful consideration, I’ve decided that it is possible, and even good, for a Catholic family to do “Santa” with their kids. I don’t think it’s a lie or imcompatible with practicing the faith. Indeed, I think it might even be a good and healthy way to let our Catholicim and our Americanness coexist and grow together. I think it’d be cool to see American Catholic Christmas become its own thing over time; and if it does, I think it could, or even should, include Santa Claus.

    In conclusion, as the song goes: “let’s give thanks to the Lord above, ’cause Santa Claus comes tonight!”

  • Are homesteaders morally superior to the rest of us? (Part Two)

    December 12th, 2025


    Previously, I published a post wondering whether homesteaders are morally superior to the rest of us. Since the time of its publication, I’ve been pondering this question further, and have spent more time with this whole homesteading, “return to the land” philosophy and with people who live by it. I’ve also been examining my own circumstances and beliefs and how those all line up, and trying to problem-solve; and, I actually feel like I may have figured this one out. Or at least made significant headway.

    Which does not happen too often with these little “Questions that Keep Me Up at Night;” so, on this momentous occasion, allow me to elaborate a bit on my findings, if you care.

    Are homesteaders morally superior to the rest of us?: No!, not necessarily. Is homesteading a morally superior way of life? No, not necessarily. So why then does it appear that way? Whence the confusion? Where does morality factor into this decision, which so many Catholics are making, to buy a bunch of land and livestock and become more self-sufficient? It can’t just be a random coincidence, that so many Catholics just love farming.

    And no, it isn’t just a coincidence. The thing is, and this is what I’ve figured out: homesteading is simply the option that makes the most sense, for most Catholic families. Why? Because, if you take the “openness to life” thing seriously, you are likely to have more than the average number of kids. (See, when I wrote Part One, I still only had three kids. Now I have four, and the difficulty has leveled up, and now I see all of these things in a new light.)

    So if you’re a faithful Catholic who’s open to life: how are you going to feed all those kids? Groceries are stupid expensive right now. Producing your own food saves money in the long run.

    And what are you going to do with all those kids all day? If you live in the city or the suburbs, you’re probably going to be stuck inside most of the time. (Sure, there was once a time, not too long ago, when the suburbs were a safe place for kids to go outside and just roam and play with their friends for hours, unsupervised; but this is 2025. Those days are sadly gone.) Which means, if you want them to have stimulation and activities and fresh air, you’ll have to take them to the park, or sign them up for activities in town, all of which cost money, time, and effort. Which is kind of an unnatural way to live, and very tiring. Living on your own land, your kids can roam outside all day for fun and stimulation and, when they’re able, do actual, meaningful work to contribute to the home economy.

    Not to mention, all of those kids being inside all day is going to make your house a huge freaking mess, which you’ll never be done cleaning up, and it will be extremely hard (extremely hard, I emphasize, as a mom of four living in a relatively small house) to keep the house orderly, clean, pleasant, peaceful, and comfortable for your family. How to fix this?: Send them outside! If you have land, your kids being outside most of the time means it’ll be easier to keep your house clean.

    Which is kind of necessary, for a good Catholic family life. A clean, orderly, and pleasant house is not a luxury, but a requirement. It doesn’t have to be lavish, but it does have to be clean and at least somewhat aesthetically-pleasing. That much is needed, for basic quality of life: for sanity, safety, and function. And having a lot of small kids running around your small house all the time, makes it virtually impossible to meet this standard. So if you can’t afford to hire nannies and housekeepers or simply don’t want to, having land to let the kids spend time outside is just a sensible solution.

    Limiting kids’ screen time is a constant effort, when you live in the suburbs/city. Because what if you need to clean the house or cook something? (Please, don’t give me the bleeding heart “just let your kids help! Kids love to help!” argument. I’m all for letting kids help where they’re able, and definitely do this as often as I can, but sometimes, we actually need to accomplish a task, and do so efficiently. Have you ever tried to let a three-year-old “help” you fold laundry or cook breakfast?) What are you supposed to with kids number 1-3 while kid 4 is getting a bath? You can’t just send them outside to play – it’s not safe. There are times when a mom needs her kids to be otherwise occupied – for them to not be actively worsening the mess. Living on your own land, kids can go outside. In the suburbs, you have to find something to do with them inside, and sometimes, screens are a lifesaver. I’d even argue that, in 2025 in the suburbs, sometimes they’re necessary.

    “But you have a backyard,” you might be saying. “Just fence in your backyard.” True, but fencing is expensive, and even if you can afford it, you have limited space, and limited privacy, in a suburban backyard. Sure the kids can play out there, until they get bored, but it’s not the same as them really free ranging out in nature.

    And privacy would make it way easier to actually go outside and stay outside, when you have little kids. Because I don’t know about you, but I find have a really hard time keeping my little kids fully clothed. So every time I send them outside, I have to get them dressed again – and not infrequently, my two-year-old will get partly undressed while playing outside. If I didn’t have neighbors on all sides, this wouldn’t be such a problem. In short, backyards can’t really compete with a private plot of farmland out in nature.

    So, yeah. It’s not a matter of Catholics doing the homesteading thing because it’s morally superior or whatever. It just simply makes the most sense, in this day and age when everything is wildly expensive and public places aren’t safe. It’s more work, having a farm, but also, in some ways, actually significantly less work. Both lifestyles have their challenges, and can be done well or poorly.

    Going back to the three moms in my previous post: I no longer think it’s true that Marge is better or more Catholic than Fran and Lois. It would just seem that, for whatever reason, Marge and her husband chose to simplify their time and budget by living on a farm. Maybe Fran and Lois are less concerned with budget, or maybe they simply prefer the hustle and bustle. Maybe they have a greater capacity for controlling the chaos inside the house, even with all the kids running around in it. Not a moral failing; we all have to choose our battles, don’t we?

    So in conclusion, I’ve realized myself through experience how difficult life in the suburbs is, when you have lots of kids, and how it just makes more sense for the good of the family to live on a farm. Not only for the reasons listed above, but also for the ones I touched on in my previous post: you’re less reliant on The System, less vulnerable in the event of some kind of apocalyptic event; as well as probably healthier, ingesting fewer toxins and microplastics, and encountering less risk of contamination; also, an opportunity to live closer to God, in very real dependence upon Him, the way our ancestors did. Which is not to say that all Catholic farmers are automatically doing better than Catholic city-dwellers. I think either life can be lived well.

    So yes, even I, who am always yakking about how not-outdoorsy I am and how much I hate dirt, heat, and bugs, have decided that I would like to eventually have some land, a big garden, and some chickens and goats. Would I enjoy it? Probably not, but, it just makes more sense.

    The problem, though, is that in order to have this simple, cost-effective lifestyle, one has to have a lot of money upfront. To purchase the land, the animals, the supplies. Back in the day, it seems, farming was for the poor and simple folks; these days, it’s like only rich people can afford to live this simply! However, I’m not here to complain about The System or bemoan my own financial situation. I’m just here to wrap up this one particular Question that Keeps Me Up at Night. What a relief. I may never be able to afford to actually live on a homestead, but at least now I know I’m not morally inferior for living where I do.

  • Holiday Baking Championship Season 12 Episode 6: Mith Reacts

    December 9th, 2025

    CAUTION: SPOILERS for this episode of HBC!

    “Work, work, okay.” – Nico, upon hearing that the assignment was rugelach and sufganiyot

    “My cookies represent death, and that is the Christmas spirit.” – Charles, about his bloody-looking cookies

    “…right now, we mad kumbaya.” – Nico, reflecting on the Naughty Team’s improvement as a team

    “My favorite day to murder someone is Christmas.” – Charles, again with the cookies

    But wait. You guys, what is going on with this show right now?!

    This was episode six, and next week is the semifinal: what? So we’re going into the semifinal with six contestants, which means we’re going into the final with five? Traditionally they have three finalists, although in recent years I’ve seen them mix it up and go into the final with four, and then eliminate one after the first challenge. But so wait, does this mean they’re going to eliminate two people next week and two the week after? Or what? How are they going to do this?

    This past spring, they split the finale into two separate episodes, but I don’t foresee them doing that with HBC, because that would push the final episode out to December 29, after Christmas Day, and we all know that in the secular world Christmas stops abruptly at the stroke of midnight on December 26th – so there’s no way they’ll let this show continue past Christmas Day. So, what will they do? What is going on here?

    And did I hear that right, that we’re getting three challenges next week?! Okay! I know I said last week that, if there were only one challenge this week, I was going to shit a brick. But, since the challenge this week consisted of three separate elements, I was actually okay with it; it really felt like three challenges in one. But so next week there will actually be three challenges. I can’t wait, I am stoked, but also, WTH? Why are they changing up the format so much? Does anyone have any insight? I need answers!

    And also, I’m completely floored that Alyx got sent home. HOW? She was one of the best. I thought she’d be in the final. And with the naughty New Orleans themed dessert platter idea – brilliant! It should have been incredible.

    And Ashleigh in the bottom two, as well?! My two superheroes! What happened?

    I’m not saying they didn’t deserve it, because they both did seem relatively weak this week. (I had no idea which one of the two was going to go home; Ashleigh had three mediocre desserts, whereas Alyx had one great one, one mediocre, and one really bad; how were the judges supposed to make that call?!) These two being in the bottom, and Alyx going home – dang. This is such a 180 from the way things have been going. I’m shook. Speaking of shook, I wonder if having to switch teams in the middle of the action threw off Alyx’s vibe, or something.

    I also think this week’s challenge was particularly ridiculous. What were they thinking? I know these championships are infamous for assigning stupidly hard challenges in a laughably short time; that’s nothing new. But this episode? This was next level. Three desserts, including a yeasted doughnut and a pastry, in the span of two and a half hours? That’s just dumb. At this point, it’s borderline just a joke; we may as well be watching Nailed It!. (Which, when is that show coming back, btw?) No wonder even the likes of Charles, Alyx, and Ashleigh were stumbling.

    Speaking of Charles. He’s also kind of done a 180, right? Not talking about his baking skills – he’s still the best baker, for sure, and the guaranteed winner. No, I’m talking about him as a character. He’s so much nicer and warmer and more friendly now than he was in the early episodes, isn’t he? I mean, yes, he’s still sassy and arrogant and, as Jesse pointed out, “The Naughtiest” on the Naughty Team (LOL), but, like, in a playful and friendly way now. Is it just me?

    I’m thinking that this metamorphosis was probably the way the creators edited the show; probably, they intentionally edited the scenes to make him appear more of an asshole early on, in order to create this compelling little character arc of him thawing out over time. (Did any of y’all ever watch Zumbo’s Just Desserts? Do you remember Daniel from that show? He was depicted as like the biggest asshole ever in baking show history, not dissimilar to the way Charles was presented in the early episodes of this season; but he’s said in interviews that he was actually perfectly cool with his fellow contestants, and that was just the way the show decided to present him, kinda cherry-picking which bits of his dialogue they aired, to amp up the drama. I feel like maybe HBC did the same with Charles.) Or maybe it’s real; I like to think it is. Well, real or not, it’s working for me. I’m all the way invested.

    Needless to say, Chase was amazing this episode. I can’t believe he out-rugelach’ed Nico. Nico couldn’t believe it either! What a bummer, that his were charred on the bottom! I think that was his downfall. I was really hoping Nico would win the whole episode, and clearly he was too. His face when they called Chase’s name – he did not feel great about being in second place! But, at least Nico came in first on his team. And that gorgeous pumpkin pie sufganiyot he made – that might have been the best dessert this episode. Duff, who, like Nico, is Jewish and a sufganiyot connoisseur, was raving about it; it was like he forgot he was a judge, for a second, and was just enjoying the thing. That was so meaningful for Nico, you could tell. He was in his element this episode, and it was fun to watch.

    Also of note this week: Jean-Carlos can not only juggle, but can manage to make orange and coffee taste good together? What? When he said he was making an orange and coffee sugar cookie, I was like: excuse me? That sounds vile! Is he insane? But, the judges gave it a solid A. Color me impressed. And, the only contestant I haven’t mentioned yet in this post: Tarek. Did you see the little clip of him from when he was on Kids Baking Championship? With the little high-pitched voice?! Hilariously cute to see the juxtaposition; reminded me of all the Stranger Things memes going around right now, showing the drastic change in the characters from season one to season five. Also, if only Tarek had had time to decorate that chocolate-cherry shortbread cookie properly, that would have been incredible! What a whirlwind.

    Readers, what is going on here? What are your thoughts? Leave me your comments!

    Superlatives from the judges: 1, Nancy to Nico: “Best doughnut on the table” (running total: 5)

    Judge says “remember, you’re on Holiday Baking Championship”: 0 (running total: 1)

    Nancy says “bite of food”: 0 (running total: ½)

    High point: Nico doing the little devil horn fingers pose when Jesse said “naughty team.” He’s so cute it makes me want to punch a wall.

    Low point: It was pretty painful to see Alyx searching desperately for a food processor and not finding one because they were all in use. She tried to make do with a blender, for her praline filling, but the thing overheated and didn’t work, and I wonder if that had something to do with why her sufganiyot didn’t work out. I was so frustrated for her because I too have tried and failed to subsitute a blender for a food processor before. And because, as a fierce individualist and a hater by nature, it’s always driven me absolutely bonkers when other people (even if they’re just innocently going about their business in my general vicinity) somehow hold me back from accomplishing something I set out to do. Like, if only they hadn’t been there! So I was really upset for Alyx at this moment.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Got to be Charles’s fig and poppyseed rugelach. Fig and poppyseed are two flavors that are especially near and dear to my little heart, so I was thrilled to see my favorite utilizing both of them in a single dessert. Beautiful! Especially with lemon – that all sounded amazing. However, Duff said that there was “no sugar” in them and that they tasted more savory than sweet. Womp womp. With fig, do you really need extra sugar, though? Hmm. I’d still try one, in any case (Duff suggested dipping in fondue cheese!).

←Previous Page
1 2 3 4 … 12
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MiTHology (4.0)
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MiTHology (4.0)
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar